Were min-nukes used to take down the Twin Towers? (Page 28): And you are exactly correct. What with Daddy Bush being a member of the NWO, I suspect he insisted that "W" be informed of...

Jean Deaux

payne1000 wrote:

You are aware that if Bush and Cheney knew before hand that the attacks would take place and did nothing to stop them, that is treason and complicity in mass murder?
Lt. Col Bob Bowman says so in this speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I

And you are exactly correct. What with Daddy Bush being a member of the NWO, I suspect he insisted that "W" be informed of the coming events. And it is conceivable that it went beyond that. Guilani also was allegedly in on it since he moved his command center out of building 7 several hours before the event. Why? What did he know of the coming
debacle? Many, many questions regarding the circumstances and the situations that developed.

payne1000

America Only wrote:

I think it is fair to say no one sent the President a post card saying they would fly planes into the twin towers.......

No, Cheney and Rumsfeld made sure Bush was out of the loop when their false flag operation took place. They knew Bush would have one of his famous brain farts and give it away.
Even in Florida Bush slipped up and later said he saw the first plane hit the tower on a TV set at the school where he was reading with kids. No video of the first plane was shown until the following day. The second plane did not hit until Bush was in the classroom where there was no TV.
Cheney didn't trust Bush enough to let him testify before the 9/11 Commission alone even though Bush and Cheney had hand picked all the members of the Commission. Bush and Cheney demanded to testify together, behind closed doors, not under oath and no records were allowed to be made of their testimony.

This is how Bush explained why they would not testify alone as the Commission requested: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I

payne1000

Jean Deaux wrote:

And you are exactly correct. What with Daddy Bush being a member of the NWO, I suspect he insisted that "W" be informed of the coming events. And it is conceivable that it went beyond that. Guilani also was allegedly in on it since he moved his command center out of building 7 several hours before the event. Why? What did he know of the coming
debacle? Many, many questions regarding the circumstances and the situations that developed.

Giuliani knew the demolition of WTC7 was scheduled to begin on the interior of the building long before the building actually went down. Barry Jennings, who was inside the building tells about being trapped inside WTC7 as the explosions were starting to happen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Tr0TZa3WeI

Jennings, father of four, died the next year of undisclosed causes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpqYftxb1oc&spfreload=10

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

payne1000 wrote:

You won't find any steel-framed skyscraper which has fallen from fire damage. In the hundred year history of skyscrapers, the only force which has brought one down is controlled demolition.
Why don't you show readers a skyscraper which fell from fire before 9/11?

Is there ONE skyscraper that was hit by TWO Large jetliners...before 9 11 that survived? And make sure the interior designs were the same....

You fail as most conspiracy people do....there is not one single "test model" of actual scale to use for a comparison. Without that, anything anyone could say is totally GARBAGE!

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

payne1000 wrote:

You won't find any steel-framed skyscraper which has fallen from fire damage. In the hundred year history of skyscrapers, the only force which has brought one down is controlled demolition.
Why don't you show readers a skyscraper which fell from fire before 9/11?

Where is the Nuke Radiation? Where is the outer ground zero for at least a few miles from the detonation of the mini nukes used? Where are the rest of the FLATTENED out buildings that would have been leveled from those mini nukes? How did all the people that did survive not have suffered severe radiation burns and sickness?

payne1000

America Only wrote:

Where is the Nuke Radiation? Where is the outer ground zero for at least a few miles from the detonation of the mini nukes used? Where are the rest of the FLATTENED out buildings that would have been leveled from those mini nukes? How did all the people that did survive not have suffered severe radiation burns and sickness?

That is all explained in the article--which you obviously did not read.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

payne1000 wrote:

This article explains the type of nuclear devices which may have been used to destroy the strong steel column interior core of the towers. Using conventional explosive would have required many more charges to be installed.
http://worldtruth.tv/russia-presents-evidence-against-us-uk-and-israel-as-being-the-actual-911-terrorist/

http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm

This covers what you mental midgets do not know...hahahahahehehehlalalolololohehehehhohoho!

payne1000

America Only wrote:

Is there ONE skyscraper that was hit by TWO Large jetliners...before 9 11 that survived? And make sure the interior designs were the same....

You fail as most conspiracy people do....there is not one single "test model" of actual scale to use for a comparison. Without that, anything anyone could say is totally GARBAGE!

All the other skyscrapers which burned were hotter fires and burned for much longer than the WTC towers. All the skyscrapers other than the 3 at WTC remained standing.

The North Tower caught fire on the 11th floor in 1975, spreading to the 17th floor. The fire burned for twice as long as on 9/11. None of the steel was weakened or needed to be replaced. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html

payne1000

America Only wrote:

http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm

This covers what you mental midgets do not know...hahahahahehehehlalalolololohehehehhohoho!

Look for the author on that debunking site. Check out his scientific credentials. I think you'll find he has none.

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

Look for the author on that debunking site. Check out his scientific credentials. I think you'll find he has none.

The author was exactly that ... the author who compiled and presented the data he researched in his work... in exactly the same manor as all your conspiracy theory authors ... no different ... except no crazy crap like molten steel for six weeks after 911.... really Larry, want to buy a bridge cheep?

Airforceone

gynojunkie wrote:

Have you no intellectual curiosity? You question nothing from your (apparently) beloved federal government, instantly deflecting anything in this post by attempting to make it political.

A True Believer--in the god of "FedGov."

Hey! Whatever keeps you comfortable...

I believe in this country we have a political process that had it's problem but it is still the best in the free world. When freedom of speech allows these GD idiots on that right wing clown car can flat out lie and they are not held accountable but freedom of speech allows it.

gynojunkie

tdsrnest wrote:

I believe in this country we have a political process that had it's problem but it is still the best in the free world. When freedom of speech allows these GD idiots on that right wing clown car can flat out lie and they are not held accountable but freedom of speech allows it.

If some group is "lying" so what? You've been lied to before--and you & the United States have survived.

Some things don't jive though. Does it not bother you one bit that the "9/11 Commission Report" fails to mention WTC 7?

As if whatever happened to WTC 7 on 9/11 would not be relevant to their report?"

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

You won't find any steel-framed skyscraper which has fallen from fire damage. In the hundred year history of skyscrapers, the only force which has brought one down is controlled demolition.
Why don't you show readers a skyscraper which fell from fire before 9/11?

In this slow motion video of the start of the failure of the south tower, you can clearly see what happened.... notice the lack of a controlled demolition .... play back the start as many times as you need to prove it to yourself once and for all....

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+wtc+south+tower+collapse&qpvt=youtube+wtc+south+tower+collapse&FORM=VDRE#view=detail&mid=D3F4C0BAC5D08DB486C6D3F4C0BAC5D08DB486C6

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

For every single "expert" the conspiracy theory nuts can bring forward, you can have a few hundred say what I say...the damned building was hit by a tremendous force, with a lot of JP-5 burning and it eventually fell. THAT is what happened period. ANYTHING else is 100% FICTION....

Blame the frigging UFO's as there are plenty of fairy tails about UFO's caused the disaster.

You want to blame someone...blame Elvis...as he has left the building........!

Jean Deaux

America Only wrote:

For every single "expert" the conspiracy theory nuts can bring forward, you can have a few hundred say what I say...the damned building was hit by a tremendous force, with a lot of JP-5 burning and it eventually fell. THAT is what happened period. ANYTHING else is 100% FICTION....

Blame the frigging UFO's as there are plenty of fairy tails about UFO's caused the disaster.

You want to blame someone...blame Elvis...as he has left the building........!

You are a simple soul, gullible to a fault. When evidence is presented you know better so its best not to confuse you with the facts. You're having far too much fun in your giggle fest to bother you with any opinion contrary to that that you have formulated on your own. And thank goodness for the rubber walls in your asylum.