Were min-nukes used to take down the Twin Towers? (Page 27): Fascinating statistic. Did you find it one of the liberal MSM or just make it up? You really had to be disturbed to come up...

Jean Deaux

tdsrnest wrote:

We still have 22% of the Republican Party that think Pearl Harbor and Vietnam never happened. They love conspiracy and the GOP prays on the stupid and 22% fall right in line. Idiots

Fascinating statistic. Did you find it one of the liberal MSM or just make it up? You really had to be disturbed to come up with a concept like that!

payne1000

tdsrnest wrote:

Why is it with you people everything is a conspiracy. That's what makes you people so far out of touch because you actually believe this BS. So you solution to these problems is vote republican. All to hide the real GOP agenda

Are you not aware that the government version which was whitewashed in the 9/11 Commission report is a conspiracy theory? The government wants us to believe that 19 Arabs led by a man on kidney dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan defeated the most defended air space in the U.S. and brought down three skyscrapers using only two planes. That is the most unbelievable conspiracy theory ever devised. And you claim to believe it. Sad, very sad, for you and those around you.

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

Are you not aware that the government version which was whitewashed in the 9/11 Commission report is a conspiracy theory? The government wants us to believe that 19 Arabs led by a man on kidney dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan defeated the most defended air space in the U.S. and brought down three skyscrapers using only two planes. That is the most unbelievable conspiracy theory ever devised. And you claim to believe it. Sad, very sad, for you and those around you.

Judging from the title of your post Larry... anything's possible... but this http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7b6_1378926526 is more probable ... I found it on youtube so it must be factual like most of your info... 8-)

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Judging from the title of your post Larry... anything's possible... but this http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7b6_1378926526 is more probable ... I found it on youtube so it must be factual like most of your info... 8-)

Just like all the cover-up sites and videos, the author of your article, Edward Current, is relatively unknown and has no scientific credentials.

My rebuttal is below:

These are the fires in WTC7 which were alleged to have brought the building down at free fall speed.

This building in China is totally engulfed in flames, yet did not fall.

This building is burning on all floors yet did not fall.

This building in Madrid burned for over 20 hours and did not fall.hours

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

Just like all the cover-up sites and videos, the author of your article, Edward Current, is relatively unknown and has no scientific credentials.

My rebuttal is below:

Your rebuttal equates to the difference between photography and engineering science .... How do you earn your keep Larry?

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Where is all the nuclear radiation from all these mini nukes? Hahahahahahahaha ehehehehehhohoholalal BRAIN DEAD!
"

Find some pictures of buildings that did burn and fall....dummy. Make sure they had large JP-5 jet fueled Commercial jets slam into them as well...IDIOT

MUslim JOE...alias....Camel Carl...alias....PAYNE!

gynojunkie

payne1000 wrote:

Are you not aware that the government version which was whitewashed in the 9/11 Commission report is a conspiracy theory? The government wants us to believe that 19 Arabs led by a man on kidney dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan defeated the most defended air space in the U.S. and brought down three skyscrapers using only two planes. That is the most unbelievable conspiracy theory ever devised. And you claim to believe it. Sad, very sad, for you and those around you.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

In their defense, though, is their True Believer consistency: everything stated by the FedGov is to be believed without question. FedGov would NEVER lie to its citizens. Not for any reason whatsoever.

emarine

gynojunkie wrote:

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

In their defense, though, is their True Believer consistency: everything stated by the FedGov is to be believed without question. FedGov would NEVER lie to its citizens. Not for any reason whatsoever.

I think the fact that Bush / Cheney knew well in advance of the 911 attacks is fairly apparent. But the conspiracy theory's on the failures are somewhat absurd... There is a point where reality ends and crazy begins ... The failures of WTC 1&2 are obvious.... the real question is why so little effort was invested in saving WTC 7 ... the official statement was the buildings fire system was destroyed in the collapse of 1&2... There were other good sources of pressure water in lower Manhattan available at the time ... Once you concentrate on the how's and whys of the failures you lose focus on the purpose of the event...

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

gynojunkie wrote:

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

In their defense, though, is their True Believer consistency: everything stated by the FedGov is to be believed without question. FedGov would NEVER lie to its citizens. Not for any reason whatsoever.

We know OBAMA lies so yeah anything MAY be possible...but this situation...well,....no.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

emarine wrote:

I think the fact that Bush / Cheney knew well in a... (show quote)

I think it is fair to say no one sent the President a post card saying they would fly planes into the twin towers.......

emarine

America Only wrote:

I think it is fair to say no one sent the President a post card saying they would fly planes into the twin towers.......

Maybe Bush.... I wouldn't bet on Cheney....

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Your rebuttal equates to the difference between photography and engineering science .... How do you earn your keep Larry?

If the engineering science hoax by Ed Current was true, most of the skyscrapers in existence would have to be condemned and all the skyscraper building codes would have to be completely revised.
Why hasn't this happened?

payne1000

America Only wrote:

Where is all the nuclear radiation from all these mini nukes? Hahahahahahahaha ehehehehehhohoholalal BRAIN DEAD!
"

Find some pictures of buildings that did burn and fall....dummy. Make sure they had large JP-5 jet fueled Commercial jets slam into them as well...IDIOT

MUslim JOE...alias....Camel Carl...alias....PAYNE!

You won't find any steel-framed skyscraper which has fallen from fire damage. In the hundred year history of skyscrapers, the only force which has brought one down is controlled demolition.
Why don't you show readers a skyscraper which fell from fire before 9/11?

payne1000

emarine wrote:

I think the fact that Bush / Cheney knew well in a... (show quote)

You are aware that if Bush and Cheney knew before hand that the attacks would take place and did nothing to stop them, that is treason and complicity in mass murder?
Lt. Col Bob Bowman says so in this speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7I

Jean Deaux

payne1000 wrote:

Just like all the cover-up sites and videos, the author of your article, Edward Current, is relatively unknown and has no scientific credentials.

My rebuttal is below:

I'm with you on this one Payne1000. Bldg 7 would be the first skyscraper brought down by fire. Other buildings have been on fire for much longer and were immune to destruction. Also, B7 is clearly characterized as a demolition project in that it fell into its own footprint. No accident that, but clearly the work of some devoted specialists. Pretty damning for the government non-conspiracy theory but then the perpetrators are trying to save their own necks and with their propensity for lies, simple to make groundless claims.
Believe me, there is no proof that the Arabs had anything to do with the event other than to be the fall guys. It was a scheme plotted by NWO gurus who had a vested interest in gaining control of Iraqi petroleum and who were trying to get the US to assume responsibility for destroying an ancient enemy, on our dime and blood. And that is what I call a conspiracy.