Were min-nukes used to take down the Twin Towers? (Page 26): Listen to eyewitness testimony again. They weren't describing transformer explosions.

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Very true Jean... there were hundreds of people wh... (show quote)

Listen to eyewitness testimony again. They weren't describing transformer explosions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UKfzGt6Fxk

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Maybe because they all didn't get hit from a loaded 767 and they appear to be full frame buildings?

Why do you always ignore the fact that WTC7 wasn't hit by any aircraft? WTC7 was a full frame building as were the twin towers.

Jean Deaux

emarine wrote:

Very true Jean... there were hundreds of people wh... (show quote)

Valid point. However, I am basing my response on the fact that the observers were professionals and would know more about the explosions than I.

Jean Deaux

payne1000 wrote:

Why do you always ignore the fact that WTC7 wasn't hit by any aircraft? WTC7 was a full frame building as were the twin towers.

And it wasn't brought down for several hours after the towers were hit. Not to mention the fact that buildings 5 and 6 were also brought down. Not a mention of them in any MSM reporting but then they might have brought the whole A/C theory crashing down.

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

Listen to eyewitness testimony again. They weren't describing transformer explosions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UKfzGt6Fxk

Interesting Larry... it would take a very talented person to know what it was that caused the rapid expansion of air to produce the sound waves from an explosion , Many heavy artillery guys can tell what cannon was fired from experience but that comes with time and repetition, on 911 there was probably many different sounds going on at the same time and a lot of confusion.. The sounds were blind and indirect making it even harder to know for sure...

okie don

So, Payne, I assume these nut jobs think Building#7 just collapsed too into its own footprint. Right?
Remember when Larry Silverstein, the owner of WTC buildings and Bldg#7 said : "pull it".
Look up Rebekah Roth, an airline stewardess and listen to her testimony. The Mossaud was behind it. Not a dude in a cave with a cell phone. Duh!!!

okie don

So, Payne, I assume these nut jobs think Building#7 just collapsed too into its own footprint. Right?
Remember when Larry Silverstein, the owner of WTC buildings and Bldg#7 said : "pull it".
Look up Rebekah Roth, an airline stewardess and listen to her testimony. The Mossaud was behind it. Not a dude in a cave with a cell phone. Duh!!!

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

okie don wrote:

So, Payne, I assume these nut jobs think Building#7 just collapsed too into its own footprint. Right?
Remember when Larry Silverstein, the owner of WTC buildings and Bldg#7 said : "pull it".
Look up Rebekah Roth, an airline stewardess and listen to her testimony. The Mossaud was behind it. Not a dude in a cave with a cell phone. Duh!!!

DUH! Good grief, not you too?

Jean Deaux

beammeupscotty wrote:

Attention deficit?........ Alzheimer's?........ dementia? Maybe just convenient omission of facts not to his liking.

Ah...i'm just being mean......maybe he watched that one video that he posted to many times, you know, the one of the seemingly endless loop of the collapse after it had started..... that's it....he just forgot about the planes.

Yeah but Abbot: All those loaded birds had was kerosene and it doesn't cause molten steel in a basement that stays molten for over 6 weeks. And the paper on desks and in file cabinets doesn't add much, if any temperature. Gonna have to do a lot better than smoke and mirrors appearing from the airliner scheme.

Airforceone

payne1000 wrote:

Why then didn't all the steel-framed buildings which burned much hotter and many times longer than the buildings on 9/11, collapse in their own footprints like a controlled demolition?

Why is it with you people everything is a conspiracy. That's what makes you people so far out of touch because you actually believe this BS. So you solution to these problems is vote republican. All to hide the real GOP agenda

Airforceone

We still have 22% of the Republican Party that think Pearl Harbor and Vietnam never happened. They love conspiracy and the GOP prays on the stupid and 22% fall right in line. Idiots

gynojunkie

tdsrnest wrote:

Why is it with you people everything is a conspiracy. That's what makes you people so far out of touch because you actually believe this BS. So you solution to these problems is vote republican. All to hide the real GOP agenda

Have you no intellectual curiosity? You question nothing from your (apparently) beloved federal government, instantly deflecting anything in this post by attempting to make it political.

A True Believer--in the god of "FedGov."

Hey! Whatever keeps you comfortable...

gynojunkie

tdsrnest wrote:

We still have 22% of the Republican Party that think Pearl Harbor and Vietnam never happened. They love conspiracy and the GOP prays on the stupid and 22% fall right in line. Idiots

[Chuckling mirthlessly]

So, the Democratic Party does not prey upon their membership? Like those 37% who still rate Killary as "honest"?

LOL.

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

gynojunkie wrote:

[Chuckling mirthlessly]

So, the Democratic Party does not prey upon their membership? Like those 37% who still rate Killary as "honest"?

LOL.

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

gynojunkie wrote:

[Chuckling mirthlessly]

So, the Democratic Party does not prey upon their membership? Like those 37% who still rate Killary as "honest"?

LOL.

They both do. That's why you two should not be arguing, but agreeing.