One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Were min-nukes used to take down the Twin Towers?
Page <<first <prev 20 of 55 next> last>>
Sep 16, 2015 10:14:22   #
payne1000
 
vernon wrote:
i dont care what they say LOOK at the film.


The videos show multiple explosions which pulverize the concrete floors and hurl thousands of tons of steel hundreds of feet outward.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 10:17:42   #
payne1000
 
vernon wrote:
there is no such thing as palastinians they are just arabs who by the way were killed by the thousands by syria and jordan


"just Arabs"? Your racism is showing, Vernon.

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 10:21:54   #
vernon
 
payne1000 wrote:
The videos show multiple explosions which pulverize the concrete floors and hurl thousands of tons of steel hundreds of feet outward.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc



the film shows the collapse of the upper floors and and going down faster as the weight went down to the next floor.
and if it was an explosion it was caused by thousands of pounds of aluminum reacting to either molten steel or gypsum.that mini nuke stuff is just crazy.

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 10:22:11   #
Scoop Henderson Loc: The Rez, (I am from Egypt)
 
vernon wrote:
there is no such thing as palastinians they are just arabs who by the way were killed by the thousands by syria and jordan


The Syro-Palestinian archeologists findings say otherwise.

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 10:32:32   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
NIST denies the pancake theory:

"NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon."
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm

Unfortunately for NIST, their later analysis made even less sense.
NIST denies the pancake theory: br br i "NI... (show quote)


here ya go Larry... see if this works to......
http://theunredacted.com/titanic-conspiracy-the-ship-that-never-sank/

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 10:36:07   #
payne1000
 
vernon wrote:
the film shows the collapse of the upper floors and and going down faster as the weight went down to the next floor.
and if it was an explosion it was caused by thousands of pounds of aluminum reacting to either molten steel or gypsum.that mini nuke stuff is just crazy.


Read the NIST link where they say the fires could not have reached more than 1800 degrees F. It takes 2800 degrees F to melt steel and gypsum does not melt. Are you as ignorant of science and physics as you appear to be?

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 10:37:42   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
here ya go Larry... see if this works to......
http://theunredacted.com/titanic-conspiracy-the-ship-that-never-sank/


It's a common tactic of trolls when they are losing a debate to try to divert to another subject.

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 11:25:18   #
okie don
 
vernon wrote:
you seem to think isreal is our enemy.now are you a nazi or just hate jews.


Check out utubes on the Khazars and read Rev 2:9 & 3:9

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 11:45:39   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
The dialogue from the firefighters' radio communications reveals that they were trying to use the elevators. This was after the plane hit the South Tower (WTC2) This was also after the firefighters had time to reach the 78th floor where the plane hit the tower. The important thing which you are attempting to confuse is that there were no significant fires in any of the lower 78 floors which would weaken the structure.


Except the many thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel running down the elevator shafts... many people used the 2 open stair ways, many died by fire in elevators making 911 the worst elevator disaster to date.... not hard to prove look it up... I posted the link from the fire chief in WTC 2 who was in the lobby manning the elevator intercom system maybe you should read the link ... All this conspiracy theory is bullshit... go back to the 911 videos and look at the huge holes in the outside structure then add in the damage inside... plus fire... had the towers been build in the conventional manor they would not have fallen... simple fact is they were not built conventionally... the impact on 911 exceeded the design specs by 20%... In my experiences once something exceeds its design you can expect a failure...

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 11:53:33   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
It's a common tactic of trolls when they are losing a debate to try to divert to another subject.


Look at your Alien Lizard video the 911 part is 1.30 secs in then look at the title of this post.... if bonkers is what you're debating than yes Larry ... you win

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoyahR-rp_I

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 12:05:17   #
J Anthony Loc: Connecticut
 
It's hard to say with any certainty exactly how and why the 9/11 tragedy was allowed to happen, even after studying all the available info. One thing I think we can know for certain, however, is that the "official" govvernment explaination is less than the whole truth, as usual.

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 12:23:57   #
payne1000
 
emarine wrote:
Except the many thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel running down the elevator shafts... many people used the 2 open stair ways, many died by fire in elevators making 911 the worst elevator disaster to date.... not hard to prove look it up... I posted the link from the fire chief in WTC 2 who was in the lobby manning the elevator intercom system maybe you should read the link ... All this conspiracy theory is bullshit... go back to the 911 videos and look at the huge holes in the outside structure then add in the damage inside... plus fire... had the towers been build in the conventional manor they would not have fallen... simple fact is they were not built conventionally... the impact on 911 exceeded the design specs by 20%... In my experiences once something exceeds its design you can expect a failure...
Except the many thousands of gallons of burning je... (show quote)


Trolls are paid to lie and you do it shamelessly. The Firefighters made it to the 78th floor. Since they did that in less than an hour, there were no significant fires below the 78th floor. All your lies are designed to obscure that fact but I'll keep reminding readers every time you attempt to divert from that fact.

By the way, WTC7 was constructed conventionally, and it fell displaying the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition.
Barry Jennings, who was an inspector for the NYC housing authority, had this to say about explosions he experienced inside WTC7 before either of the twin towers fell. From his testimony, it's obvious that the explosions he described were part of the controlled demolition process. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Tr0TZa3WeI

Barry Jennings died at the age of 53 from unknown causes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ris8OGSskCk

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 12:31:24   #
payne1000
 
J Anthony wrote:
It's hard to say with any certainty exactly how and why the 9/11 tragedy was allowed to happen, even after studying all the available info. One thing I think we can know for certain, however, is that the "official" govvernment explaination is less than the whole truth, as usual.


If you studied all the available 9/11 information, you would know that it was "made" to happen.

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 12:48:51   #
J Anthony Loc: Connecticut
 
payne1000 wrote:
If you studied all the available 9/11 information, you would know that it was "made" to happen.

Reply
Sep 16, 2015 12:54:32   #
J Anthony Loc: Connecticut
 
payne1000 wrote:
If you studied all the available 9/11 information, you would know that it was "made" to happen.


I agree, it was not an "out-of-the-blue" incident by any means. Cui bono, right? But our fellow citizens are not prepared or willing to acknowledge that anyone in our own government or that any of our own private citizens are culpable regarding such a thing, or benefited from it in any way.. It could be decades before our citizens are psychologically capable of considering that, not unlike the JFK assasination.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 20 of 55 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.