Were min-nukes used to take down the Twin Towers? (Page 16): Do you think Muslims had access to the bowels of the Towers? Here's a Texas corporation which did: "Turner Construction...

payne1000

emarine wrote:

The only thing getting pulled here Larry is the "readers' chains...

Do you think Muslims had access to the bowels of the Towers?

Here's a Texas corporation which did:
"Turner Construction Company, assigned to re-fireproof the steel frames of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers during the late 1990s, who also occupied space on the 38th floor of WTC 1 and was later assigned to quickly collect and remove the wreckage of the WTC towers destroyed during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, also supervised the 2000 implosion of Seattle Kingdome during this same period."

Read more . . . http://911blogger.com/news/2009-03-04/pre-911-wtc-steel-fireproofingpost-911-ground-zero-clean-contractor-planned-2000-seattle-kingdome-demolition

vernon

Jean Deaux wrote:

Vernon, Delusion reigns, more's the pity. Actually, the whole building was aluminum, the easier to get it off the ground. Right?

I DONT KNOW ABOUT THAT BUT THERE WAS 250 TONS IN THE PLANE AND YOU CAN BET IT WAS ALLOVER THE PLACE AFTER THE CRASH.

payne1000

padremike wrote:

Seems to me that I recall that every credible inte... (show quote)

Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector said he doubted Iraq had any WMDs. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/may/23/iraq1

By the way, Israel has a secret nuclear weapons cache they have never allowed to be inspected. Since there is serious evidence that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks, doesn't it seem wise that the UN demand they give up those weapons which they might use on the U.S. or Iran?

Grugore

payne1000 wrote:

Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector said he doubted Iraq had any WMDs. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/may/23/iraq1

By the way, Israel has a secret nuclear weapons cache they have never allowed to be inspected. Since there is serious evidence that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks, doesn't it seem wise that the UN demand they give up those weapons which they might use on the U.S. or Iran?

That comment proves that you are too stupid to live. Let's confirm it. Do you think Iran should be allowed to have nukes? A simple yes or no is all I require.

payne1000

Grugore wrote:

That comment proves that you are too stupid to live. Let's confirm it. Do you think Iran should be allowed to have nukes? A simple yes or no is all I require.

I'd much rather Iran have them than Israel. Iran has not attacked the U.S.
Israel has--twice.

Grugore

payne1000 wrote:

I'd much rather Iran have them than Israel. Iran has not attacked the U.S. Israel has.

CONFIRMED! Congratulations. You are a certified idiot. I could point out how Iran is the worlds biggest sponsor of global terrorism. I could point out how many Americans died as a result. Iran chants "DEATH TO AMERICA" and you want them to have NUKES? Yeah. It all just bounces off of your impenetrable armor of ignorance. You're way too stupid to live.

vernon

payne1000 wrote:

Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector said he doubted Iraq had any WMDs. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/may/23/iraq1

By the way, Israel has a secret nuclear weapons cache they have never allowed to be inspected. Since there is serious evidence that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks, doesn't it seem wise that the UN demand they give up those weapons which they might use on the U.S. or Iran?

if they have it they have had it for years.they wouldent use it unless it was to save them selves.now the iraninans and and saudis support terror all over the world.so just who is worse.

vernon

payne1000 wrote:

The word is out that Jews were warned not to come to work that day. Larry Silverstein and his spawn didn't show up for work that day. Zim Israel/American Shipping moved out of one of the towers 2 weeks before the attacks, forfeiting $50,000 on their lease. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ScGZCqEyGM

thats a lie.

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

What completely blows your argument away is the fact that almost all the tenants in the towers below the floors where the planes hit escaped down the stairwells. If there were fires below where the planes hit, this would not have been possible.

Firemen reached the 78th floor on the South Tower and radioed that they almost had the fire out. That was when those controlling the detonators decided they had better blow the South Tower first even though it was the second tower to be hit and had burned less time than the North Tower.

This is a partial transcript from the recorded Firefighter radio transmissions in the South Tower:

"9:52 a.m.
Battalion Seven Aide: "Seven Alpha for Battalion Seven."

Battalion Seven Chief: "South tower, Steve, south tower, tell them...Tower one. Battalion Seven to Ladder 15.

"Fifteen."

Battalion Seven Chief: "I'm going to need two of your firefighters Adam stairway to knock down two fires. We have a house line stretched we could use some water on it, knock it down, kay."

Ladder 15: "Alright ten-four, we're coming up the stairs. We're on 77 now in the B stair, I'll be right to you."

Ladder 15 Roof: "Fifteen Roof to 15. We're on 71. We're coming right up."
Now skip to 01:11:22...
9:57 a.m.
"Division 3 ... lobby command, to the Fieldcom command post."

Battalion Seven Chief: "Operations Tower One to floor above Battalion Nine."

Battalion Nine Chief: "Battalion Nine to command post."

Battalion Seven Operations Tower One: "Battalion Seven Operations Tower One to Battalion Nine, need you on floor above 79. We have access stairs going up to 79, kay."

Battalion Nine: "Alright, I'm on my way up Orio."

Ladder 15 OV: "Fifteen OV to Fifteen."

Ladder 15: "Go ahead Fifteen OV, Battalion Seven Operations Tower One."

Ladder 15 OV: "Stuck in the elevator, in the elevator shaft, you're going to have to get a difference elevator. We're chopping through the wall to get out."

Battalion Seven Chief: "Radio lobby command with that Tower One."

9:58 a.m.

Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven to Ladder 15."

(END OF TAPE)
These tapes reveal the fact that the firefighters were not overly concerned with the strength of the fires and believed they could control them. They were not raging infernos that could melt steel. These tapes alone prove that the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Towers is a complete and total lie. Why have the rest of the tapes been classified? Because they reveal the truth, that 's why."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/multimedia_priorknowledge_firefighterstape.html

This conversation proves there were no fires in the lower floors and the fact that the firefighters were attempting to use the elevators proves there were no fires in the elevators.
Readers should know by now who conducts themselves more like an alien lizard, emarine. Let's see that forked tongue again.

What completely blows your argument away is the fa... (show quote)

Does it Larry...
the elevators first hand....

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002-09-04-elevator-usat_x.htm

There were many elevators and 3 stairways ... The fire consumed stairway C and most all the elevators... any fire fighter can tell you that fires go out and flair back up unpredictably... if you open the wrong door a room can burst into flames at anytime...

One stairway in the south tower remained open above the crash, but few used it to escape. Stairway A, one of three, was unobstructed from top to bottom. The jet crashed into the 78th through 84th floors of the south tower. A few people escaped from the 78th floor down these stairs. One person went down the stairs from the 81st floor, two from the 84th floor and one from the 91st. Others went up these stairs in search of a helicopter rescue that wasn't possible because of heavy smoke on the rooftop.

vernon

payne1000 wrote:

I'd much rather Iran have them than Israel. Iran has not attacked the U.S.
Israel has--twice.

just to say alum melts at 1200 degrees and gypsum melts at 365 degrees and that is a disaster waiting to happen.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

payne1000 wrote:

Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector said he doubted Iraq had any WMDs. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/may/23/iraq1

By the way, Israel has a secret nuclear weapons cache they have never allowed to be inspected. Since there is serious evidence that they were involved in the 9/11 attacks, doesn't it seem wise that the UN demand they give up those weapons which they might use on the U.S. or Iran?

I am glad, blissfully happy, that Israel possesses nuclear weapons and if they didn't I'd advocate that America supplies them with nukes, lots of them, both strategic and tactical, and the delivery systems needed to send them down their enemies poop shoot. I want to ask you a serious question. Did you walk to school or carry your lunch? You've got to be mad, as insane, to believe the tripe coming out of Jew haters to believe they had a hand in 911. Israel has nukes and they are surrounded by enemies and those enemies know that the Jews motto of "Never again" is no idle Obama style "red line" drawn in the sand. If the time comes, I want Israel to use their nukes. Do you know that when Israel was given nation status in 1948 by the UN, they benevolently offered the Palestinians land for their own state? And even then Palestinian hatred would not allow their sick evil pride to acquiesce. So far as allowing the UN to inspect Israel's nuclear stockpile I wouldn't allow the UN to inspect my outhouse. The UN blamed rights? Israel every time Hamas sends rockets into Israel and Israel retaliated. It's a bloody shame that one of the planes that crashed into the twin towers couldn't have missed and crashed into the UN. Do you recall who the UN appointed to oversee human rights?

payne1000

Grugore wrote:

CONFIRMED! Congratulations. You are a certified idiot. I could point out how Iran is the worlds biggest sponsor of global terrorism. I could point out how many Americans died as a result. Iran chants "DEATH TO AMERICA" and you want them to have NUKES? Yeah. It all just bounces off of your impenetrable armor of ignorance. You're way too stupid to live.

Let me say again, Iran has never attacked America.
Israel has--twice.

payne1000

vernon wrote:

thats a lie.

Prove it, vernon.

Grugore

payne1000 wrote:

Prove it, vernon.

Why should he? You have proven nothing. Just posted a conspiracy theory.

Grugore

payne1000 wrote:

Let me say again, Iran has never attacked America.
Israel has--twice.

Wrong again, Skippy. Iran attacked our embassy. That is considered American soil. So, yes. They attacked us.