payne1000

I suspect you are ignorant of the Manhattan Project. There were thousands involved in the creation of the atomic bomb. How much leakage was there on that project?

I also suspect that you haven't figured out that the government version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory. They haven't supplied any valid proof to support their conspiracy theory. Much more evidence that their theory is wrong has been posted on the internet. The major media is controlled by the perpetrators so you won't see anything but coverup there--except sometimes things slip through the cracks--as here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-OfVkka1Yk

Sicilianthing

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I just love that one...

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

*FM 3-19.40 (FM 19-40)
Field Manual Headquarters NO. 3-19.40 Department of the Army Washington. DC. 1August 200.1
Military Police InternmentlResettlement Operations
Contents
Page
PREFACE .................................................................................................................... v
PART ONE FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERNMENTIRESETTLEMENT OPERATIONS
http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/mil_pol_operations.pdf

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Every one that cares, and understands what America is up against; should copy, paste, save, and share with all they can:.
Roster of CFR/Trilateral Commission Members is below
Hillary Clinton Frankly Reveals the CFR Is Running the USA ...
Hillary Clinton spills the beans at the inauguration of the new office for Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C. Some have said it was simply a slip of the tongue but whatever the perception is Clinton frankly revealed who's running the show in these United States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2T-5Pd3oYY

Some Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Facts
The 3,000 seats of the CFR quickly filled with members of America's elite. Today, CFR members occupy key positions in government, the mass media, financial institutions, multinational corporations, the military, and the national security apparatus.
Since its inception, the CFR has served as an intermediary between high finance, big oil, corporate elitists and the U.S. government. The executive branch changes hands between Republican and Democratic administrations, but cabinet seats are always held by CFR members. It has been said by political commentators on the left and on the right that if you want to know what U.S. foreign policy will be next year, you should read Foreign Affairs this year.
The CFR's claim that "The Council has no affiliation with the U.S. government" is laughable. The justification for that statement is that funding comes from member dues, subscriptions to its Corporate Program, foundation grants, and so forth. All this really means is that the U.S. government does not exert any control over the CFR via the purse strings.
Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members, beginning with CFR founding member Allen Dulles. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.
Almost all White House cabinet positions are occupied by CFR members. President Clinton, himself a member of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, employs almost one hundred CFR members in his administration. Presidents come and go, but the CFR's power--and agenda--always remains.
The CFR's Shroud of Secrecy - On its web page, the CFR boasts that its magazine, Foreign Affairs, "is acclaimed for its analysis of recent international developments and for its forecasts of emerging trends." It's not much of a challenge to do so, though, when you play a part in determining what those emerging trends will be.
So are they predicting trends or creating them? The answer is fairly obvious to anyone who has earnestly reflected on the matter.
The CFR fancies itself to represent a diverse range cultural and political interests, but its members are predominantly wealthy males, and their policies reflect their elitist biases. The CFR attempts to maintain the charade of diversity via its Non-Attribution Rule, which allows members to engage in "a free, frank, and open exchange of ideas" without fear of having any of their statements attributed in public. The flip side of this, obviously, is a dark cloud of secrecy which envelopes the CFR's activities.
CFR meetings are usually held in secret and are restricted to members and very select guests. All members are free to express themselves at meetings unrestrained, because the Non-Attribution Rule guarantees that "others will not attribute or characterize their statements in public media forums or knowingly transmit them to persons who will," according to the Council on Foreign Relations' 1992 Annual Report.
The report goes on to forbid any meeting participant "to publish a speaker's statement in attributed form in any newspaper; to repeat it on television or radio, or on a speaker's platform, or in a classroom; or to go beyond a memo of limited circulation."
The end result is that the only information the public has on the CFR is the information they release for public consumption, which should send up red flags for anyone who understands the immense effect that CFR directives have on America's foreign policy. The public knows what the CFR wants the public to know about the CFR, and nothing more. There is one hole in the fog of secrecy, however: a book entitled Tragedy and Hope, written by an "insider" named Dr. Carroll Quigley, mentor of Bill Clinton.
Google: “Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral, Commission, Bilderberg Group”________________________________________
A few more notables in Both Parties Serving Bilderberger’s CFR/TC/BB AGENDA:
Bush Sr. - CFR,B (R)
Bush Jr? Cabinet CFR (R)
Both Clintons - CFR,TC,B (D)
Jimmy Carter - CFR,TC (D)
Obama & Biden - CFR (D)
Dick Cheney - CFR,TC (R)
Newt Gingrich - CFR (R)
Mitch McConnell - CFR (R)
Rick Perry - BB,2007 (D&R)
John Kerry CFR (D)
John McCain - CFR (R)
Zbig Brzezinski - TC, BB (D)
Heny Kissinger BB,CFR,TC (R) Paul Volker- CFR,TC,BB (D) Alan Greenspan CFR,TC,BB
Ben Bernanke BB
Tim Geithner - CFR,TC BB
David Rockefeller CFR,TC,BB George Soros - CFR,BB (D)
Albert Gore, Jr. CFR,TC (D)
Donald Rumsfeld CFR ,BB(R)
Jacob “Jack” Lew CFR (D)
Robert Gates BB,CFR,TC (D
Leon Panetta CFR (D)
Lee Hamilton CFR,TC (R)
Robert Reich CFR (D)
Condoleezza Rice CFR (R)
Susan Rice CFR (D)
Ted Cruz CFR (R)



THE MEDIA:
George Will - CFR,TC (R)
George Stephanopoulos
CFR, BB (D)
William Kristol BB (R) William Buckley Jr. CFR,BB (R)
Tom Brokaw CFR
FOX owner
Rupert Murdock – CFR, BB
FOX SPINNERS
John Bolton CFR (R)
Dick Morris (D&R)
Charles Krauthammer CFR(R)
Doug Schoen CFR
Washington Post owner
Katherine Graham CFR,TC,BB

David Richmond Gergen - CNN Spinner BB/CFR/TC/92 (D)
Robert B. Reich CFR (D)

Brian Williams - CFR

In the News:
Haley Barbour CFR (D)
Eric Holder CFR (D)
Larry Summers CFR, BB
Janet Yellen CFR (D)
Chuck Hagel CFR (D)
Sylvia Burwell CFR/11 (D)
Jeh Johnson CFR (D)
Ashton Carter CFR/92 (D)
Benjamin Netanyahu CFR’88

More Politicians:

Fred Thompson CFR (R)
Charles B. Rangel CFR (D)
Barney Frank CFR (D)

Richard Newton Gardner CFR/RS/TC/84
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (D) CFR/92
Sandra Day O'Connor (R) CFR/92
Robert S. Mcnamara CFR (D)
Warren Christopher CFR (D)
Madeleine Albright CFR (D)
Samuel Richard ("Sandy") Berger CFR/BB (R)


Military
General David Petraeus CFR,
CIA Director Chuck Hagel CFR

International Bankers - James Wolfensohn BB,CFR,TC & Paul Wolfowitz BB,CFR,TC


Obama’s Executive Cabinet members:
In order of succession to the Presidency:

Vice President of the United States
Joseph R. Biden CFR/88
X Speaker of the House (Not in cabinet) Nancy Pelosi
Now JohnBoehner
Department of State
Secretary Hillary Rodham BB/CFR/RS/TC –
See Hillary’s speaches at CFR meeting on Youtube


Department of the Treasury
Secretary Timothy F. Geithner BB/CFR/TC/09
NOW: Jacob “Jack” Lew CFR

Department of Defense
Secretary Leon E. Panetta CFR


Chuck Hagel CFR

Department of Justice
Attorney General Eric H. Holder CFR

Newbees:
Ashton Carter CFR/92
Jeh Charles Johnson CFR

Pentagon Senior Counsel CFR

Director, CIA/ DHS Secretary
Jeh Charles Johnson CFR

Sylvia Mathews Burwell CFR/11


More positions filled with CFR:


Department of Commerce
Secretary John E. Bryson CFR/TC/88

Department of Veterans Affairs
Secretary Eric K. Shinseki CFR


Department of Homeland Security
Secretary Janet A. Napolitano CFR
Florida Representative and DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. CFR

United States Ambassador to the United Nations
Ambassador Susan Rice CFR
White House Chief of Staff
Bill Daley CFR
Department of Agriculture
Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack CFR
Source: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/cfrall1.htm#d
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/roundtable/CFRA-Elist.html - Initial List of Council on Foreign Relations Members

Hillary Clinton Frankly Reveals the CFR Is Running the USA ...
Hillary Clinton spills the beans at the inauguration of the new office for Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C. Some have said it was simply a slip of the tongue but whatever the perception is Clinton frankly revealed who's running the show in these United States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2T-5Pd3oYY

payne1000

Read about Zionist control of CFR: http://www.rense.com/general48/captiv.htm

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

This article covers the take over of America really well.
Proponents of the Left and Right should read and take note of it.

Sadly; most are too lazy.

payne1000

It might help them understand why Capitol Hill doesn't represent Americans any more.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Money grubbing Boot Licks all!

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Geo Engineering - The Silence of Engineered Genocide

Skies should be blue and clouds should be white. This site should be top reading for all of us. Better start paying attention to people like this and what they have to say.

http://youtu.be/C07EddRW2uU

Anyone who disputes this can go right here:

US Congressional Research Services: Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy

US Congressional Research Service
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf

Then come back and tell us we are "conspiracy" nutjobs.
Don't worry....if you do take the time to read all about this, you won't be calling us anything but the exposers of truth!
Summary
Climate change policies at both the national and international levels have traditionally focused on
measures to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to adapt to the actual or anticipated
impacts of changes in the climate. As a participant in several international agreements on climate
change, the United States has joined with other nations to express concern about climate change.
Some recent technological advances and hypotheses, generally referred to as “geoengineering”
technologies, have created alternatives to traditional approaches to mitigating climate change. If
deployed, these new technologies could modify the Earth’s climate on a large scale. Moreover,
these new technologies may become available to foreign governments and entities in the private
sector to use unilaterally—without authorization from the United States government or an
international treaty—as was done in the summer of 2012 when an American citizen conducted an
ocean fertilization experiment off the coast of Canada.
The term “geoengineering” describes an array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and
deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract
anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research
stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover,
very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, sociopolitical
impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were
to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.
In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal
(CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the
warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.
CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods
address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.
Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do
not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively
immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.
To date, there is limited federal involvement in, or oversight of, geoengineering. However, some
states as well as some federal agencies, notably the Environmental Protection Agency,
Department of Energy, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Defense, have taken
actions related to geoengineering research or projects. At the international level, there is no
international agreement or organization governing the full spectrum of possible geoengineering
activities. Nevertheless, provisions of many international agreements, including those relating to
climate change, maritime pollution, and air pollution, would likely inform the types of
geoengineering activities that state parties to these agreements might choose to pursue. In 2010,
the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted provisions calling for member parties to abstain
from geoengineering unless the parties have fully considered the risks and impacts of those
activities on biodiversity.
With the possibility that geoengineering technologies may be developed and that climate change
will remain an issue of global concern, policymakers may determine whether geoengineering
warrants attention at either the federal or international level. If so, policymakers will also need to
consider whether geoengineering can be effectively addressed by amendments to existing laws
and international agreements or, alternatively, whether new laws and international treaties would
need to be developed.

Where is jmho when you need him?

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Geoengineering Governance............................................................................................................ 3
Risk Factors ............................................................................................................................... 4
Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................ 6
Geoengineering Technologies .......................................................................................................... 9
Carbon Dioxide Removal ........................................................................................................ 10
Carbon Capture and Sequestration .................................................................................... 10
Ocean Fertilization ............................................................................................................ 12
Afforestation ...................................................................................................................... 13
Enhanced Weathering ........................................................................................................ 14
Solar Radiation Management .................................................................................................. 15
Enhanced Albedo (Surface and Cloud) ............................................................................. 16
Aerosol Injection ............................................................................................................... 18
Space-Based Reflectors ..................................................................................................... 19
The Debate over the Methods of Oversight ................................................................................... 20
The Status Quo ........................................................................................................................ 20
Threshold for Oversight .......................................................................................................... 20
Methods for Oversight ............................