archie bunker wrote:
I have a question.
WHAT CIVIL RIGHTS HAS TRUMP TAKEN AWAY??
So far none, which isn't to say he isn't trying. That's because his unsuccessful attempts to take civil rights away have so far been stopped by the courts for constitutional reasons.
Before I get into a comprehensive response, I want to make sure you understand the difference between civil rights and civil liberties because I've noticed a lot of people get them confused, probably because it really is a legal technicality, but it's the law anyway and as a conservative I would expect you to have respect for them.
Civil Liberties is what most people automatically think about. They are the liberties that are guaranteed by the Federal government, the most famous of which are embodied in the Bill of Rights, such as the right to bear arms or the right to free speech.
Civil Rights are more numerous because they are more specific and they result from laws and court decisions established at all levels of the government from municipal to federal, but they all share a common theme based on the equality clause of the 14th amendment, which is itself based on the founding idea that all men are created equal and that certain rights are inalienable... a stipulation that I often think the right wishes didn't exist.
So when Trump starts isolating ethnic groups for unequal treatment he is at the very least violating the equality clause that a large number of civil rights laws are based on. In most cases which the ACLU will be taking there are clear violations of our civil liberties.
That being said. I'll give you some examples...
Trump has called for the jailing and revocation of citizenship for U.S. citizens who burn a flag. That's a direct violation of the 1st Amendment's guarantee that the government shall not infringe on our right to free speech.
Trump has suggested the use of torture or waterboarding, which is patently unconstitutional and violates international treaties that the U.S. government has signed. The Constitution specifies that any treaty ratified by the federal government becomes the law of the land... that includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Convention and a number of other agreements that prohibit torture.
The ban on Muslims is obviously a law based on religion, which is a direct violation of the First Amendment's guarantee that the government will do no such thing, The ACLU is stating that it may also be a violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Trump's castigation of the Hamilton cast for their statement to Vice President Pence shows a complete disrespect for free speech and he continues to make it clear that people with dissenting opinions will not be tolerated.
Trump has repeatedly extolled the virtues of ethnic profiling, which is an activity that often involves an invasion of privacy and the seeks a result that is itself a violation of the equality clause.
stop and frisk... I can remember Trump debating the virtues of stop and frisk. Stopping someone and searching them is a violation of the 4th Amendment. The ex police commissioner of New York said in response to Trumps plug, that stop and frisk, didn't really work and the liability of violating the Constitution wasn't worth the policy.
...Like I said... it's all talk so far and it's possible We the People can stop Trump from striping civil rights and liberties from people, but he is very clear about his feelings... So it makes sense to at least prepare the counter-attack.
archie bunker wrote:
Which side is trying to stifle the freedom of speech across the country?
Fragments of both sides, depending on the issue.
archie bunker wrote:
Which side is trying to destroy traditional values, morals, and beliefs?
Various elements that aren't compliant with the ideals of either side.
archie bunker wrote:
Ok. It was more than one question.
Where are you straightup? You fuking dirt bag commie SOB!
Coming from you, those are compliments. :)