nwtk2007 wrote:
I was referring to when man was created; so did God know the nature of man when he created us.
What I mean is that both communism and capitalism require something form man in order to work, which is not necessarily a part of man's natural psyche. Communism requires that everyone work for the common good but of course it is in man's nature to want to take more for himself; possibly a biological instinct to insure the passage of the genes. And in capitalism, man needs to eventually give back to the community rather than hoarding his wealth/goods, depriving the less fortunate/less intelligent/less skilled. You can probably describe this better than I can. But that's what I was referring to.
The one percenter's of today are essentially destroying the system which has allowed them to prosper. They take and take, driven by greed, while in many cases, put nothing back into the system. The result is an unstable system of have's and have not's. Eventually, the instability is manifest in frustrations being misinterpreted as bigotry/racism/elitism/etc.
I was referring to when man was created; so did Go... (
show quote)
Well, you're wrong, of course.
Socialism/Communism DOESN'T work, simply because of man's competitive nature. That doesn't imply that man is always out to exploit others for his own sake only. Capitalism DOES work, because of that competitive nature. But capitalism, because it involves risk taking and forethought (thinking about the needs of the future) necessarily implies innovation and it is that which takes mankind forward, not backward. AND provides for those less able.
There are true capitalists, as I just described, then there are what I call the "rogue" capitalists, or the renegades. Remember my topic on Galt's Gulch, "The Most Dangerous Game"? That explains part of it. That part that is in the nature of some men to become enamored of the game itself, the risk. When competition becomes an end in itself. I believe the renegades also get a "taste" of the power, and arrogance, associated with "winning", and it's the power that can become an addiction. Chasing that high. It is never about greed.
At any rate, Socialism and Communism or any other variant of Marxism demeans the individual, exalting the masses, the mediocre, over the uniqueness of each individual. That is another important cause for its failure, and the malignancy of its ideology.
Jesus said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into heaven. He meant not that being wealthy would keep one from getting into heaven; it is the arrogance that accompanies great accumulations of wealth---or knowledge---that diminishes one's spirit.
You know, I think if one studies the biography of men such as Henry Ford, or Bill Gates, he would see that these men started out, not with the purpose of gouging his neighbor, but they ended, after a taste of power and influence, with an arrogance that made them believe they know more, and thus could, and should, have more control over the lives of others.
Anyway, you seem to be coming from a very religious viewpoint, and I don't care for that.
God said that it is through evolution that a robust people for a robust planet was created. Who are you to argue with that?
Competition is necessary. And He also said, (when I asked what children do when they first realize they are not the only one their mother loves), They become competitive. Because they become competitive doesn't mean they are out to get their brother.