One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
News Flash: Liberals have lost the war on America
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
Feb 21, 2017 11:15:09   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
HedgeHog wrote:
Sometimes I feel I have to decipher what you write.

You used the word "Did". Do you mean, DOES He? And limits of what sort? I think you are referring to questions that occupied the minds of certain European philosophers in the 20th century, who tried to solve them without referring to the nature of man himself. I believe they were trying to ascertain just what were the relationships between the individual and society, between the individual and the State, and between society and the State. They didn't do a very good job.

Thus, the horrifying 20th century. Can't you just hear God saying: "Don't make me come down there!"

Think the Hundred Years War. How long did that go on before God sent Joan of Arc?
Sometimes I feel I have to decipher what you write... (show quote)


I was referring to when man was created; so did God know the nature of man when he created us.

What I mean is that both communism and capitalism require something form man in order to work, which is not necessarily a part of man's natural psyche. Communism requires that everyone work for the common good but of course it is in man's nature to want to take more for himself; possibly a biological instinct to insure the passage of the genes. And in capitalism, man needs to eventually give back to the community rather than hoarding his wealth/goods, depriving the less fortunate/less intelligent/less skilled. You can probably describe this better than I can. But that's what I was referring to.

The one percenter's of today are essentially destroying the system which has allowed them to prosper. They take and take, driven by greed, while in many cases, put nothing back into the system. The result is an unstable system of have's and have not's. Eventually, the instability is manifest in frustrations being misinterpreted as bigotry/racism/elitism/etc.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 11:49:36   #
HedgeHog
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I was referring to when man was created; so did God know the nature of man when he created us.

What I mean is that both communism and capitalism require something form man in order to work, which is not necessarily a part of man's natural psyche. Communism requires that everyone work for the common good but of course it is in man's nature to want to take more for himself; possibly a biological instinct to insure the passage of the genes. And in capitalism, man needs to eventually give back to the community rather than hoarding his wealth/goods, depriving the less fortunate/less intelligent/less skilled. You can probably describe this better than I can. But that's what I was referring to.

The one percenter's of today are essentially destroying the system which has allowed them to prosper. They take and take, driven by greed, while in many cases, put nothing back into the system. The result is an unstable system of have's and have not's. Eventually, the instability is manifest in frustrations being misinterpreted as bigotry/racism/elitism/etc.
I was referring to when man was created; so did Go... (show quote)


Well, you're wrong, of course.

Socialism/Communism DOESN'T work, simply because of man's competitive nature. That doesn't imply that man is always out to exploit others for his own sake only. Capitalism DOES work, because of that competitive nature. But capitalism, because it involves risk taking and forethought (thinking about the needs of the future) necessarily implies innovation and it is that which takes mankind forward, not backward. AND provides for those less able.

There are true capitalists, as I just described, then there are what I call the "rogue" capitalists, or the renegades. Remember my topic on Galt's Gulch, "The Most Dangerous Game"? That explains part of it. That part that is in the nature of some men to become enamored of the game itself, the risk. When competition becomes an end in itself. I believe the renegades also get a "taste" of the power, and arrogance, associated with "winning", and it's the power that can become an addiction. Chasing that high. It is never about greed.

At any rate, Socialism and Communism or any other variant of Marxism demeans the individual, exalting the masses, the mediocre, over the uniqueness of each individual. That is another important cause for its failure, and the malignancy of its ideology.

Jesus said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into heaven. He meant not that being wealthy would keep one from getting into heaven; it is the arrogance that accompanies great accumulations of wealth---or knowledge---that diminishes one's spirit.

You know, I think if one studies the biography of men such as Henry Ford, or Bill Gates, he would see that these men started out, not with the purpose of gouging his neighbor, but they ended, after a taste of power and influence, with an arrogance that made them believe they know more, and thus could, and should, have more control over the lives of others.

Anyway, you seem to be coming from a very religious viewpoint, and I don't care for that.

God said that it is through evolution that a robust people for a robust planet was created. Who are you to argue with that?

Competition is necessary. And He also said, (when I asked what children do when they first realize they are not the only one their mother loves), They become competitive. Because they become competitive doesn't mean they are out to get their brother.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 11:55:06   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
lindajoy wrote:
Simply "clueless".....


Yes, but as I mentioned, he shore has a purty mouth.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2017 11:58:55   #
Carol Kelly
 
Loki wrote:
Maybe we can call it the Liberal Hobbit Dancer Fault Line. Who knows? Could even be we will have the "BIG ONE." 10.1 on the political Richter Scale.


We can only wish. Every good American should leave California with Nestle and then just sit back and watch things disappear as in swallowed up by the earth. Brown had his brain fried many years ago. How does he continue to be elected? I know...the illegals and the druggies and brain dead Hollywood. At least, can we make Pelosi and SAN Francisco
disappear?

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 11:59:02   #
HedgeHog
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I was referring to when man was created; so did God know the nature of man when he created us.

What I mean is that both communism and capitalism require something form man in order to work, which is not necessarily a part of man's natural psyche. Communism requires that everyone work for the common good but of course it is in man's nature to want to take more for himself; possibly a biological instinct to insure the passage of the genes. And in capitalism, man needs to eventually give back to the community rather than hoarding his wealth/goods, depriving the less fortunate/less intelligent/less skilled. You can probably describe this better than I can. But that's what I was referring to.

The one percenter's of today are essentially destroying the system which has allowed them to prosper. They take and take, driven by greed, while in many cases, put nothing back into the system. The result is an unstable system of have's and have not's. Eventually, the instability is manifest in frustrations being misinterpreted as bigotry/racism/elitism/etc.
I was referring to when man was created; so did Go... (show quote)


Damn, nwtk. I thought I was writing you a PM! Now the whole world knows!! How could I have made that mistake?

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 12:21:30   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I was referring to when man was created; so did God know the nature of man when he created us.

What I mean is that both communism and capitalism require something form man in order to work, which is not necessarily a part of man's natural psyche. Communism requires that everyone work for the common good but of course it is in man's nature to want to take more for himself; possibly a biological instinct to insure the passage of the genes. And in capitalism, man needs to eventually give back to the community rather than hoarding his wealth/goods, depriving the less fortunate/less intelligent/less skilled. You can probably describe this better than I can. But that's what I was referring to.

The one percenter's of today are essentially destroying the system which has allowed them to prosper. They take and take, driven by greed, while in many cases, put nothing back into the system. The result is an unstable system of have's and have not's. Eventually, the instability is manifest in frustrations being misinterpreted as bigotry/racism/elitism/etc.
I was referring to when man was created; so did Go... (show quote)


Soros immediately came to mind regarding your second paragraph...

Men instinctively look to succeed and provide, raised to protect family it carries on to their own later...

Capitalism being the way and means hopefully instills in us a natural desire to see all prosper from their own efforts.. When unable to do so it never hurts to lend a help up...The more that prosper from their own endeavors the better we, as a society are, ultimately, yes??

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 12:22:52   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
HedgeHog wrote:
Well, you're wrong, of course.

Socialism/Communism DOESN'T work, simply because of man's competitive nature. That doesn't imply that man is always out to exploit others for his own sake only. Capitalism DOES work, because of that competitive nature. But capitalism, because it involves risk taking and forethought (thinking about the needs of the future) necessarily implies innovation and it is that which takes mankind forward, not backward. AND provides for those less able.

There are true capitalists, as I just described, then there are what I call the "rogue" capitalists, or the renegades. Remember my topic on Galt's Gulch, "The Most Dangerous Game"? That explains part of it. That part that is in the nature of some men to become enamored of the game itself, the risk. When competition becomes an end in itself. I believe the renegades also get a "taste" of the power, and arrogance, associated with "winning", and it's the power that can become an addiction. Chasing that high. It is never about greed.

At any rate, Socialism and Communism or any other variant of Marxism demeans the individual, exalting the masses, the mediocre, over the uniqueness of each individual. That is another important cause for its failure, and the malignancy of its ideology.

Jesus said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into heaven. He meant not that being wealthy would keep one from getting into heaven; it is the arrogance that accompanies great accumulations of wealth---or knowledge---that diminishes one's spirit.

You know, I think if one studies the biography of men such as Henry Ford, or Bill Gates, he would see that these men started out, not with the purpose of gouging his neighbor, but they ended, after a taste of power and influence, with an arrogance that made them believe they know more, and thus could, and should, have more control over the lives of others.

Anyway, you seem to be coming from a very religious viewpoint, and I don't care for that.

God said that it is through evolution that a robust people for a robust planet was created. Who are you to argue with that?

Competition is necessary. And He also said, (when I asked what children do when they first realize they are not the only one their mother loves), They become competitive. Because they become competitive doesn't mean they are out to get their brother.
Well, you're wrong, of course. br br Socialism/Co... (show quote)


"God said that it is through evolution that a robust people for a robust planet was created." God said that? I don't disagree with it, but I also didn't know "he" said it. This is funny, in a way. I am certainly not trying to be religious. When I say God, I am referring to that great unknown; that something of the universe gave rise to man, and not necessarily as the apex being. Evolution, in truth, doesn't select for "intelligence." But I have the background to be able to speak the language.

Thanks for your explanation. I told you. You can articulate it much better than I. Obviously competition is the essence of what man needs to grow and survive. Capitalism also, obviously, is the means to that in society. I would question, however, our governmental systems. It seems there have been successful systems with "rulers", "kings", etc with the base of society essentially capitalistic beneath that umbrella. Remember the Atreides' planet Caledon; the Atreides were the beloved rulers but the economy was essentially that of a capitalistic society.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2017 12:24:05   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Loki wrote:
Yes, but as I mentioned, he shore has a purty mouth.


yes it does...

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 12:25:16   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
[quote=lindajoy]Soros immediately came to mind regarding your second paragraph...

Men instinctively look to succeed and provide, raised to protect family it carries on to their own later...

Capitalism being the way and means hopefully instills in us a natural desire to see all prosper from their own efforts.. When unable to do so it never hurts to lend a help up...The more that prosper from their own endeavors the better we, as a society are, ultimately, yes??[/quote

Maybe what our system of capitalism has lost is Honor.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 12:28:06   #
HedgeHog
 
lindajoy wrote:
Soros immediately came to mind regarding your second paragraph...

Men instinctively look to succeed and provide, raised to protect family it carries on to their own later...

Capitalism being the way and means hopefully instills in us a natural desire to see all prosper from their own efforts.. When unable to do so it never hurts to lend a help up...The more that prosper from their own endeavors the better we, as a society are, ultimately, yes??


I think that is a good way to look at it.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 13:04:43   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
[quote=nwtk2007][quote=lindajoy]Soros immediately came to mind regarding your second paragraph...

Men instinctively look to succeed and provide, raised to protect family it carries on to their own later...

Capitalism being the way and means hopefully instills in us a natural desire to see all prosper from their own efforts.. When unable to do so it never hurts to lend a help up...The more that prosper from their own endeavors the better we, as a society are, ultimately, yes??[/quote

Maybe what our system of capitalism has lost is Honor.[/quote]

Greed has replaced Honor...Yes...

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2017 13:06:42   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
HedgeHog wrote:
I think that is a good way to look at it.


My simple logic to it all and Thank You..

I much enjoyed your post you thought was a PM...

It was as enlightening as enjoyable to decipher..Also well said!!

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 14:23:33   #
Mikeyavelli
 
lindajoy wrote:
Greed has replaced Honor...Yes...

I am well traveled, well read, socially active, and I don't personally know anyone who I would perceive as greedy.
...when will illiar decide that taking donations for the benefit of others (bill and Chelsea ) is enough. They are the definition of greed and grift, yet, they are praised as beneficent gods.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 20:04:02   #
HedgeHog
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
"God said that it is through evolution that a robust people for a robust planet was created." God said that? I don't disagree with it, but I also didn't know "he" said it. This is funny, in a way. I am certainly not trying to be religious. When I say God, I am referring to that great unknown; that something of the universe gave rise to man, and not necessarily as the apex being. Evolution, in truth, doesn't select for "intelligence." But I have the background to be able to speak the language.

Thanks for your explanation. I told you. You can articulate it much better than I. Obviously competition is the essence of what man needs to grow and survive. Capitalism also, obviously, is the means to that in society. I would question, however, our governmental systems. It seems there have been successful systems with "rulers", "kings", etc with the base of society essentially capitalistic beneath that umbrella. Remember the Atreides' planet Caledon; the Atreides were the beloved rulers but the economy was essentially that of a capitalistic society.
"God said that it is through evolution that a... (show quote)


1. Why doesn't evolution select for intelligence? I just found this out: Homo sapiens sapiens was the only species of the genus Homo to emerge from the Paleolithic Age. I think it was because H.sapiens sapiens had the better ability to conceptualize, and a more advanced form of foresight. Thus H. sapiens sapiens was in a better position to exercise control over the environment in times of rapidly changing climate, than the other Homo species.

2. I don't remember Caledon; however, an economic system and a governing system are separate, yet related. Remember my topic (CarolSeer's topic) "Countervailing Powers"---"When the holders of property and the holders of knowledge, either scientific or religious, align with the sword and the purse, then power becomes concentrated and freedom vanishes."
Here's a link to that topic: It's a good starter if you're interested in forming good governments.

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-23382-1.html

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 22:22:47   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
HedgeHog wrote:
1. Why doesn't evolution select for intelligence? I just found this out: Homo sapiens sapiens was the only species of the genus Homo to emerge from the Paleolithic Age. I think it was because H.sapiens sapiens had the better ability to conceptualize, and a more advanced form of foresight. Thus H. sapiens sapiens was in a better position to exercise control over the environment in times of rapidly changing climate, than the other Homo species.

2. I don't remember Caledon; however, an economic system and a governing system are separate, yet related. Remember my topic (CarolSeer's topic) "Countervailing Powers"---"When the holders of property and the holders of knowledge, either scientific or religious, align with the sword and the purse, then power becomes concentrated and freedom vanishes."
Here's a link to that topic: It's a good starter if you're interested in forming good governments.

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-23382-1.html
1. Why doesn't evolution select for intelligence?... (show quote)


Good to hear from you.

Fitness is determined by reproductive success. Intelligence my gut have some selection strength, we will see. But, how long has it been around, and look what it does to its world.

Now Caladan. The Atreides home world. You should reread Dune. Herbert was ahead of the curve.

Trying not to be too obscure. But, there's the mystery!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.