One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Remember the TV show "Get Smart"?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
Feb 20, 2017 18:18:59   #
Carol Kelly
 
HedgeHog wrote:
The "president's" work had already been done when he instigated the revolution in Libya and bombed Qaddafi. We could have worked with Qaddafi. Oh yeah, and that was where Ovomit bypassed the War Powers Resolution, right, ginger?

Weekly visit to Walter Reed hospital? WTF?



Reply
Feb 20, 2017 19:05:41   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
HedgeHog wrote:
The "president's" work had already been done when he instigated the revolution in Libya and bombed Qaddafi. We could have worked with Qaddafi. Oh yeah, and that was where Ovomit bypassed the War Powers Resolution, right, ginger?

Weekly visit to Walter Reed hospital? WTF?


lololololllšŸ¤— shhhhhhh

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 19:19:26   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2017 19:44:47   #
okie don
 
Ginger,
I'm ex Army.
4 good men died in Lybia while the 'Comnander-in-Chief ' failed to do his job.

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 20:17:55   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Nickolai wrote:
The corporate state is still in control this phony populist message is just a sop to keep the little people at bay


Your "adult depends" keep YOU at bay....idiot stick!

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 21:01:42   #
Harpooner1
 
lindajoy wrote:
lololololllšŸ¤— shhhhhhh


Here are some facts on the Libya that Obama attacked.

In response to G.W. Bush going after Iraq, Ghaddafi gave up weapons of mass destruction and future programs of acquiring the materials. Now, we don't know if Saddam Hussein's stockpile was shipped to Libya, but, it has been speculated.

We all know Libya has been connected to terrorist acts, and Ghaddafi lost family and almost his own life after the connection to the Pan Am tragedy over Scotland. This was under Reagan.

Ghaddafi was the longest ruling regime in North Africa. Over 40 years, and the people and the economy was by far and away the best of the North African countries. It's true.

So why did Obama and Hillary attack this country that was turning to the West?

Well, Ghaddafi was angling for a new currency for his oil.

It was going be based on gold. The Chinese were also interested, as were the Russians. The Petro Dollar was threatened.
And, Obama, who couldn't tie his shoelaces without the advice from the Clinton's, was compelled to invade Libya and fuck it up.
You just have to ask some simple questions. And, then you can see logical answers. Why was there a CIA annex in Benghazi?
Why did Obama go after a Ghaddafi that was mellowing in his anti West rhetoric?

The whole truth may never come out, of course. But, as far as the actions in Libya under Obama, there are so many questions.
But, you have to ponder the facts on the ground.....There are answers......

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 21:12:07   #
HedgeHog
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
Here are some facts on the Libya that Obama attacked.

In response to G.W. Bush going after Iraq, Ghaddafi gave up weapons of mass destruction and future programs of acquiring the materials. Now, we don't know if Saddam Hussein's stockpile was shipped to Libya, but, it has been speculated.

We all know Libya has been connected to terrorist acts, and Ghaddafi lost family and almost his own life after the connection to the Pan Am tragedy over Scotland. This was under Reagan.

Ghaddafi was the longest ruling regime in North Africa. Over 40 years, and the people and the economy was by far and away the best of the North African countries. It's true.

So why did Obama and Hillary attack this country that was turning to the West?

Well, Ghaddafi was angling for a new currency for his oil.

It was going be based on gold. The Chinese were also interested, as were the Russians. The Petro Dollar was threatened.
And, Obama, who couldn't tie his shoelaces without the advice from the Clinton's, was compelled to invade Libya and fuck it up.
You just have to ask some simple questions. And, then you can see logical answers. Why was there a CIA annex in Benghazi?
Why did Obama go after a Ghaddafi that was mellowing in his anti West rhetoric?

The whole truth may never come out, of course. But, as far as the actions in Libya under Obama, there are so many questions.
But, you have to ponder the facts on the ground.....There are answers......
Here are some facts on the Libya that Obama attack... (show quote)



I've told you the truth. It was not economically related. Only in so far Ovomit and the Left's instigation of revolutions across the Near and Middle East would, as they planned, eventually end in communist-dominated governments.

And that is why there will be charges brought against Clinton and Ovomit for Crimes Against Humanity. The people of the world demand it.

Revolutions instigated for the purpose of regime toppling, resulting in the death of hundreds of thousands of innocents.

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2017 21:36:28   #
Harpooner1
 
HedgeHog wrote:
I've told you the truth. It was not economically related. Only in so far Ovomit and the Left's instigation of revolutions across the Near and Middle East would, as they planned, eventually end in communist-dominated governments.

And that is why there will be charges brought against Clinton and Ovomit for Crimes Against Humanity. The people of the world demand it.

Revolutions instigated for the purpose of regime toppling, resulting in the death of hundreds of thousands of innocents.
I've told you the truth. It was not economically ... (show quote)


There were a number of factors involved, and there was an economic incentive. For instance, Hillary Clinton had a good friend, Sydney Blumenthal, who had business interests in the outcome of the Libyan situation. It has been revealed he was sending her information on what was going on in Libya, even though, he was forbidden by the Obama administration from being part of the State Department. This is why, one reason, Hillary had set up her private communications and deleted some 30,000 plus emails.
I don't disagree with you, Hedge. I am only probing the many tentacles of this cabal of scum known as the Obama administration. It goes deeper than anyone could believe. But, you just have to do a "Columbo" on it.........
One piece is this....Gee...I suppose that makes that makes sense....But, you know, I have a couple of questions...
And when you start asking questions.......the probable scenarios come up......What makes sense, the motivations behind the actions and what they say.....The ones your asking questions of.......
And it doesn't add up....So, why doesn't it add up? Because they are lying about their motives. Why are they lying about their motives? because they have something to hide. What are they hiding?.....
If you think the worst, total corruption. If you think innocence...Total incompetence.....

The middle ground is corruption and incompetence.

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 21:50:13   #
HedgeHog
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
There were a number of factors involved, and there was an economic incentive. For instance, Hillary Clinton had a good friend, Sydney Blumenthal, who had business interests in the outcome of the Libyan situation. It has been revealed he was sending her information on what was going on in Libya, even though, he was forbidden by the Obama administration from being part of the State Department. This is why, one reason, Hillary had set up her private communications and deleted some 30,000 plus emails.
I don't disagree with you, Hedge. I am only probing the many tentacles of this cabal of scum known as the Obama administration. It goes deeper than anyone could believe. But, you just have to do a "Columbo" on it.........
One piece is this....Gee...I suppose that makes that makes sense....But, you know, I have a couple of questions...
And when you start asking questions.......the probable scenarios come up......What makes sense, the motivations behind the actions and what they say.....The ones your asking questions of.......
And it doesn't add up....So, why doesn't it add up? Because they are lying about their motives. Why are they lying about their motives? because they have something to hide. What are they hiding?.....
If you think the worst, total corruption. If you think innocence...Total incompetence.....

The middle ground is corruption and incompetence.
There were a number of factors involved, and there... (show quote)



You can't disagree with me. I have told you the truth. And it is connected with his (and Clinton's) use of made-up charges to put me in jail. I told you it would scare the bejeesus out of you if you knew ALL of the truth.

I'm not asking questions; I'm giving you answers and reasons. And it doesn't matter if you believe me or not, there are others---around the world---who read and believe.

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 21:56:35   #
HedgeHog
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
There were a number of factors involved, and there was an economic incentive. For instance, Hillary Clinton had a good friend, Sydney Blumenthal, who had business interests in the outcome of the Libyan situation. It has been revealed he was sending her information on what was going on in Libya, even though, he was forbidden by the Obama administration from being part of the State Department. This is why, one reason, Hillary had set up her private communications and deleted some 30,000 plus emails.
I don't disagree with you, Hedge. I am only probing the many tentacles of this cabal of scum known as the Obama administration. It goes deeper than anyone could believe. But, you just have to do a "Columbo" on it.........
One piece is this....Gee...I suppose that makes that makes sense....But, you know, I have a couple of questions...
And when you start asking questions.......the probable scenarios come up......What makes sense, the motivations behind the actions and what they say.....The ones your asking questions of.......
And it doesn't add up....So, why doesn't it add up? Because they are lying about their motives. Why are they lying about their motives? because they have something to hide. What are they hiding?.....
If you think the worst, total corruption. If you think innocence...Total incompetence.....

The middle ground is corruption and incompetence.
There were a number of factors involved, and there... (show quote)


In other words, in case you didn't get it, I am not making suppositions here; that IS what in fact happened.

Reply
Feb 20, 2017 21:56:52   #
Carol Kelly
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
There were a number of factors involved, and there was an economic incentive. For instance, Hillary Clinton had a good friend, Sydney Blumenthal, who had business interests in the outcome of the Libyan situation. It has been revealed he was sending her information on what was going on in Libya, even though, he was forbidden by the Obama administration from being part of the State Department. This is why, one reason, Hillary had set up her private communications and deleted some 30,000 plus emails.
I don't disagree with you, Hedge. I am only probing the many tentacles of this cabal of scum known as the Obama administration. It goes deeper than anyone could believe. But, you just have to do a "Columbo" on it.........
One piece is this....Gee...I suppose that makes that makes sense....But, you know, I have a couple of questions...
And when you start asking questions.......the probable scenarios come up......What makes sense, the motivations behind the actions and what they say.....The ones your asking questions of.......
And it doesn't add up....So, why doesn't it add up? Because they are lying about their motives. Why are they lying about their motives? because they have something to hide. What are they hiding?.....
If you think the worst, total corruption. If you think innocence...Total incompetence.....

The middle ground is corruption and incompetence.
There were a number of factors involved, and there... (show quote)


Wow! The middle ground sounds like quicksand. I believe we are suffering from corruption and a total incompetence to get a handle on it. Nothing adds up and you are right, it's because there are so many people lying. The news media at the top of the list.
We watch Fox News, but not all of Fox News. Some of them are wolves in lambs clothing.
And we have pretty much figured it out. Chris Wallace is arrogant and unreal and he's not
the only one.

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2017 22:07:49   #
HedgeHog
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
There were a number of factors involved, and there was an economic incentive. For instance, Hillary Clinton had a good friend, Sydney Blumenthal, who had business interests in the outcome of the Libyan situation. It has been revealed he was sending her information on what was going on in Libya, even though, he was forbidden by the Obama administration from being part of the State Department. This is why, one reason, Hillary had set up her private communications and deleted some 30,000 plus emails.
I don't disagree with you, Hedge. I am only probing the many tentacles of this cabal of scum known as the Obama administration. It goes deeper than anyone could believe. But, you just have to do a "Columbo" on it.........
One piece is this....Gee...I suppose that makes that makes sense....But, you know, I have a couple of questions...
And when you start asking questions.......the probable scenarios come up......What makes sense, the motivations behind the actions and what they say.....The ones your asking questions of.......
And it doesn't add up....So, why doesn't it add up? Because they are lying about their motives. Why are they lying about their motives? because they have something to hide. What are they hiding?.....
If you think the worst, total corruption. If you think innocence...Total incompetence.....

The middle ground is corruption and incompetence.
There were a number of factors involved, and there... (show quote)


I will add one more thing: Ovomit wanted it to be, thought it would be, a domino effect: one North African country falls, and they all would tumble. Like dominoes.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 00:59:02   #
Harpooner1
 
HedgeHog wrote:
You can't disagree with me. I have told you the truth. And it is connected with his (and Clinton's) use of made-up charges to put me in jail. I told you it would scare the bejeesus out of you if you knew ALL of the truth.

I'm not asking questions; I'm giving you answers and reasons. And it doesn't matter if you believe me or not, there are others---around the world---who read and believe.


Could you be more specific? I need a bit more information, if you don't mind.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 01:01:58   #
HedgeHog
 
Harpooner1 wrote:
Could you be more specific? I need a bit more information, if you don't mind.



A bit more information for what? You don't need to know everything.

Reply
Feb 21, 2017 01:52:47   #
Harpooner1
 
HedgeHog wrote:
A bit more information for what? You don't need to know everything.

And I don't need to know nothing....
To be vague is nothing.....You are vague. Your truth is a vapor. Not to say I don't agree....I just don't have the ground to agree as you don't give me this.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.