PeterS wrote:
You act like abortion didn't exist before RvW. The only thing that changed was after RvW we started counting. Before RvW no one cared...
Incredibly incorrect. Roe v Wade opened the floodgate. Try actually learning. You advocate a woman's right to destroy her life rather than advocate for responsibility and the use of contraceptives.
You don't have a leg to stand on regarding this issue and you are displaying incredible ignorance. Abortion isn't about convenience except in the minds of non caring and shallow people.
Abortion is about the quality of and the continuation of life for the child, the mother, and the father.
PeterS wrote:
It's god who does the forgiving--we can be as nasty and vengeful as we like...
Sure you can, but if you cross the line there is no coming back.
Docadhoc wrote:
The case that came before the SCOTUS was because she said she was raped and was denied abortion in Texas. Roe v Wade came of that. She later admitted she in fact had not been raped and had in fact lied repeatedly under oath. The entire Roe v Wade case was based on her lie. She in fact had 3 children and gave them all up for adoption by age 22.
It would have been so much better all the way around had she never gotten pregnant.
Abortion is not birth control. It is not a simple exercise as too many think. It is a surgical procedure and even in the most sterile of conditions can result in the injury, loss of future child bearing capability, or death of the female.
A woman who submits herself to such a procedure instead of using easily available birth control is playing Russian Roulette with her health and life.
The case that came before the SCOTUS was because s... (
show quote)
And please don't leave out the pain the baby feels as he or she is being dismembered. Abortion even on a secular level is barbaric, savage and uncivilized. Bernard Nathanson, (the father of the abortion movement-he lied and said over 10,000 women had serious complications or died from illegal abortions, the true number was 200-250), he performed thousands of abortions, but when technological advances allowed him to film an abortion in the womb, he made the documentary The Silent Scream- he didn't perform another abortion after watching the baby trying to save it's life by moving away from the sharp instruments getting ready to butcher him or her. When he lied to get abortion legalized he was hailed as hero by the pro-abortion crowd, when he told the truth about the savagery he became a pariah
PaulPisces wrote:
Thank you for sharing this. I am saddened to find she had such a difficult life.
Yes, her life was one of trials, tribulations, and sadness, brought about by her own bad choices, but at least she had a life unlike the millions of babes slaughtered in her name and because of her deviousness in concert with a morally bereft supreme court... a 'Whut's Happenin' Now' version of what was once actually a Supreme Court.
"Women's right to control their bodies.." every time I hear that twisted phrase, which is code for 'We Women Want
*Special State-Sanctioned Killer Status*, I wonder why it is that if women so long to be in control of their bodies, why the hell do they "open up" so easily to that which will inseminate them?
(NOTE: Incidents of rape and incest are not included in my thoughts, above.)
I am glad that she passed away with the knowledge that she did not murder her child through abortion because murdering children was still considered illegal.
THUNDERBOLT wrote:
INTERESTING...
Characteristically Italian!!!!!
Pennylynn wrote:
You have your opinions, I have mine. This woman was far worse than Hitler. It is estimated that Hitler killed 5 to 6 million.... by this woman's actions and lies she is responsible for the murder and dismemberment of over 58 million people. BTW.... I am not a Christian, I am a Jew and I have no visions of Pearly Gates or a Saint welcoming me. Each person will receive exactly what they earn. And, take your own advice.... it is not too late for you to change.
"Christian is as Christian does."
THUNDERBOLT wrote:
INTERESTING...
Brilliant. As for the judge, I wonder if he'd like a job on the 9th Circuit......?
Ricktloml wrote:
And please don't leave out the pain the baby feels as he or she is being dismembered. Abortion even on a secular level is barbaric, savage and uncivilized. Bernard Nathanson, (the father of the abortion movement-he lied and said over 10,000 women had serious complications or died from illegal abortions, the true number was 200-250), he performed thousands of abortions, but when technological advances allowed him to film an abortion in the womb, he made the documentary The Silent Scream- he didn't perform another abortion after watching the baby trying to save it's life by moving away from the sharp instruments getting ready to butcher him or her. When he lied to get abortion legalized he was hailed as hero by the pro-abortion crowd, when he told the truth about the savagery he became a pariah
And please don't leave out the pain the baby feels... (
show quote)
Amazingly, small people felt pain before and after the zippy-feel-good, pandering-to-killers legal paper work.
It is no great leap of any reasonable imagination to see the day the SCOTUS and the berserk masses would join hands and kill off all retirees.... the very people to whom they all owe their survival.
The law might read, 'Prior to the third month of idleness, a person over the age of (take your pick) 65/70 will be deemed a *worthless load* and incapable of feeling pain.. so... " A similar 'decree' might be levied upon the crippled, those without skills, those mothers who are receiving welfare.. all those - you know -
undesirables.
S. Maturin wrote:
Amazingly, small people felt pain before and after the zippy-feel-good, pandering-to-killers legal paper work.
It is no great leap of any reasonable imagination to see the day the SCOTUS and the berserk masses would join hands and kill off all retirees.... the very people to whom they all owe their survival.
The law might read, 'Prior to the third month of idleness, a person over the age of (take your pick) 65/70 will be deemed a *worthless load* and incapable of feeling pain.. so... " A similar 'decree' might be levied upon the crippled, those without skills, those mothers who are receiving welfare.. all those - you know - undesirables.
Amazingly, small people felt pain before and after... (
show quote)
Yes, "the new world order."
Ricktloml wrote:
And please don't leave out the pain the baby feels as he or she is being dismembered. Abortion even on a secular level is barbaric, savage and uncivilized. Bernard Nathanson, (the father of the abortion movement-he lied and said over 10,000 women had serious complications or died from illegal abortions, the true number was 200-250), he performed thousands of abortions, but when technological advances allowed him to film an abortion in the womb, he made the documentary The Silent Scream- he didn't perform another abortion after watching the baby trying to save it's life by moving away from the sharp instruments getting ready to butcher him or her. When he lied to get abortion legalized he was hailed as hero by the pro-abortion crowd, when he told the truth about the savagery he became a pariah
And please don't leave out the pain the baby feels... (
show quote)
Rather than treat pro abortionists as evil, I see them as incredibly insulated against the reality of the procedure.
Liberals/pro abortionists are people like you and I. They are not some other life form and not inherently anti American nor the enemy. They are incredibly ignorant as to the nuts and bolts of abortion. As long as they do not possess the religious component that opposes abortion, for them it boils down to at what level do they connect with it.
Without real experience of the procedure it becomes a matter of convience. It is easy for them to connect at the most superficial level, that being convince of the women's right to choose. They totally take the rights of the father out of the picture and since they view the fetus as nothing more than a chunk of tissue much like a tumor, they deny its life therefore it's right to live.
I would like for every pro abortionist to be forced to watch either a live real time abortion or the in vitro filming of one. Then I'd like them to look me in the eye and tell me a life had not just been taken.
What every pro abortionist I've encountered has in common with every other one is their shared detachment from the fetal life and the minimization of the scope of reality surrounding the issue.
S. Maturin wrote:
Amazingly, small people felt pain before and after the zippy-feel-good, pandering-to-killers legal paper work.
It is no great leap of any reasonable imagination to see the day the SCOTUS and the berserk masses would join hands and kill off all retirees.... the very people to whom they all owe their survival.
The law might read, 'Prior to the third month of idleness, a person over the age of (take your pick) 65/70 will be deemed a *worthless load* and incapable of feeling pain.. so... " A similar 'decree' might be levied upon the crippled, those without skills, those mothers who are receiving welfare.. all those - you know - undesirables.
Amazingly, small people felt pain before and after... (
show quote)
They better wait a while. A lot of people in that age bracket are excellent marksmen.
Docadhoc wrote:
They better wait a while. A lot of people in that age bracket are excellent marksmen.
Surely a few will be 'neutralized', but judging from the robot-like masses of Hillarybots, being overwhelmed is a real possibility.
S. Maturin wrote:
Surely a few will be 'neutralized', but judging from the robot-like masses of Hillarybots, being overwhelmed is a real possibility.
Can hillbots stand 30 to 1 loss ratios and survive? No, they cannot, so they should not ever think of violence as an answer.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.