lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Your stats are based on what has been, not what we do to change the total number of immigrants in our country, if any.. We are under no legal obligation to take any period... if we limit influx to say 50k a year based on absolute need of persecution and that means all immigrants, not just muslims....
And I do mean absolute need, not just everyone who wants to come in..

Mosques should be limited to what exists now with a 10 year ban to allow anymore period and then based on need because the area is without one, not because they just want another to out number the other denominational churches....

I write Trump personally as well as my representatives and even Congress as it is.. Am working on a Terms Limit I petition through the the WhiteHouse site and am involved in research on an Article V about Term limits already .. it takes av34 state majority with 26 on board...

By pass anymore red tape with the flawed judicial system we can not trust~~ think AG AND DOJ of the past..Trump can stop all entry right now for as long as he believes is needed to secure our homeland!!

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Well, Wolf, if I were President, there would be no 'immigration problem'.

zombietracker Loc: Fema region 6

fullspinzoo

I agree. I would shut the whole immigration situation down, like I said before. We are not required by law or anything else to let these refugees or immigrants in. And if anybody has a problem with it, blame the judge in Washington. Everything was moving in the right direction until this judge through a wrench in the whole thing. No good deed goes unpunished. Well, screw em. If this is the way they want to play, halt the whole program.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

"Being right" is a matter of opinion. This policy is NOT "suddenly necessary", it was and has been the way immigrants were admitted. Vetting is the proper way to handle immigration. Try to go to another country and see if you're not vetted. This whole article is wrong.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

The 9th District Court of Appeals is a joke and has been for years.. They have been reversed 90% of the time on appeal.. Not only the most liberal in rulings incompetent as well.. Senator McCain has a motion to disban them he filed well before this issue came up..It should be granted!!

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

We have this mess because vetting became so lax, especially under BO'S open arm policy of come on in! And his hands off directives to the border payrol•°!!!!

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Thank You, snowbear....

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Thank You, zillaorange
..

zillaorange

Good Morning, you've got my vote !!!

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Guantanamo , the new Ellis island and extreme vetting from there and my idea would include execution of radicals but I do agree with the 3 year ban to begin with .

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

That's not an answer Larry.

If you became president today, you would be faced with a very difficult immigration problem.

It sounds as though you truly don't understand the full scope of the definition of immigration.

I would suggest that before you comment , do your homework.

Because this response you gave me, paints you to be less informed than a high school dropout.

Get educated........................Pilgrim !

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

You think I ducked the question. In a way, you might be right.



Yes, if I were to become President today, I would most certainly be faced with a lot of very difficult decisions to make about the 'immigration problem'. Keeping that in mind, there is no way that I would accept the position of President of the United States today, and thus would not be faced with these decisions.



Well, according to Wikipedia:

"Immigration is the international movement of people into a destination country of which they are not natives or where they do not possess citizenship in order to settle or reside there, especially as permanent residents or naturalized citizens, or to take-up employment as a migrant worker or temporarily as a foreign worker".

And:
"Studies show that the elimination of barriers to migration would have profound effects on world GDP, with estimates of gains ranging between 67 and 147 percent. Development economists argue that reducing barriers to labor mobility between developing countries and developed countries would be one of the most efficient tools of poverty reduction."

Also, it's hard to argue that the US is not at the leading edge of this;
"The largest number of international migrants live in the United States, with 19% of the world's total."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration




Is that sufficient 'homework' or do you still consider me "to be less informed than a high school dropout"?



"Pilgrim". Settler. Not am immigrant. Sorry, I am neither immigrant or pilgrim. I was actually born here.

Your move.

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

You've done well, grasshopper.

I apologize for my condescending behavior.

I also, would not care to take on the responsibilities of the presidency.

I find it a challenge just being president of my own humble holdings.

I built the perimeter fence around my property for the same reason Trump wants to build a wall.

And at the gates of my property, I do not allow Muslims to enter.

I can't think of any others that I would not welcome as long as they are respectful of my home.

I have made it clear that I am a racist, but I have welcomed members of many different races within my border fence for purposes of both business and friendship.

The "No Muslims" rule will stay in place as long as I remain above ground.

I can't control who comes into this country.

But I can darn well control who sets foot upon my little chunk of Texas dirt.