Steve700 wrote:
The first thing you should realize is that when the Koran is translated into English it is soft peddled for Westerners compared to the way it reads in Arabic. For instance in Arabic it will say "fight them until there is no more opposition" and in English the same passage will read "Fight them until there is no oppression". Those words are quite different and indicative of the way Islamic theology always portrays Islam as the victim when in fact the opposite is far more true.
The first thing you should realize is that when th... (
show quote)
Steve... they *ALL* do that. Have you never heard a Jew talk about how "their people" have always been persecuted? I have. Lots of times. And ya know... I hear it from various Christians too... the most persecuted religion on the Levant.
Steve700 wrote:
Muslims will always tell you there is only one Koran and I am convinced most of them actually believe it. But that is not true, but it is what they are told, but actually there are as many as 29 different Korans; all very similar of course but 29 different ones.
I was raised on the King James Bible, where you? Are you going to tell me there's only one version of the Bible? Are you going to tell me that Christians think God held a press conference and there were a group of prophets taking notes leading to the different versions of the Bible that we have? Or is it more like each church thinks the version they use is the best interpretation?
Really, Steve... I just don't see your point.
Steve700 wrote:
Why do you think you have Shiites, Sunnis, Wahobi, Sufis, etc. warring upon each other and calling the others apostates?
For the same reason the English had a civil war between the Anglicans and the Calvinists, or why the disputes between the Roman Catholics and Protestants in Ireland created a terrorist movement. Or sometimes, I'm sure it's a matter of national conflict and the belligerent countries happen to have different cultures... someone bent on blaming religion for everything could easily point out the religious conflicts... WW2... or "the German Lutherans vs the British Anglicans"... Cold War... or "the American Protestant vs the Russian Orthodox" Mexican-American War... Protestants vs Catholics.
You get the idea...
Steve700 wrote:
8:39, that most famous of verses in the Koran, w hich is most often given as an example of verses that rule out most all the peaceful stuff about how Muslims are to treat infidels (whom they call Kafers) is relatively early in the Koran with the peaceful versus being more towards the end. The Koran has no context and that gives the impression that the contradicting peaceful verses are the ones that prevail. But the opposite is true.
No, the Koran DOES have context and it's well known how difficult that is to translate. It's not just semantics, it's deep in the culture. I do NOT claim to understand the context as I don't speak any of the Semitic languages. But I've listened to real live Muslims talk about this with me and I am pretty confident there is context. The fact that you think there is no context only serves to confirm that you do not understand it any more than I do and your self-stated authority on the matter which you place on this "lack of context" rings hollow.
Just think about this for a second... Who am I going to believe? This well-educated and very impressive engineer that I work with every day, who is respectful, helps me out, brings me food his wife cooks, laughs at my jokes, talks about his kids and happens to be Muslim or this anonymous entity on a political website that rants and rants about how Muslims want to kill us all?
[quote=Steve700]
What you don't understand is that when the Koran or Muslims talk about "[u]'When the unbelievers cease hostilities', you have to realize that Islamic ideology is demonically designed and what that really means is "When the unbelievers cease resisting being subjugated". I think that will become more clear to you as you read on here.
I have had four different Korans in front of me at one time and looked up that very same verse 8:39. I can tell you they were worded differently in each Koran, but the meaning was the same. Some say "Until there is no more dissent", some said "Until there is no more disagreement", some say "until there is no more challenge", some say "until there is no more opposition", and the most soft peddled and deceitful interpretations say oppression to give the impression that the poor Muslims are being victimized. What you don't understand is that in Islamic theology your mere existence is a threat to them and Islam. That's the way a jihadist understands it and believe me, they can clean the clock of any moderate Muslim in a debate.
[/quote]
Well, my Muslim friends are probably what you would call moderate Muslims. I generally avoid the company of extremists in any religion and I certainly do not defend their actions. But let me make a point here. My issue with the way you and that Trump asshole view Muslims is that you put them all in the same bag. It's like sending ALL the black people to jail because *some* of them are bad. Here you are trying to tell me how fragmented Islam is and yet you refuse to acknowledge any difference between them in your persecution. My friends at work are not here to fucking kill anyone.
Steve700 wrote:
They are very knowledgeable about the verses in the Koran, Hadith and other authoritative Islamic literature, including the opinions of Islamic scholars, that justify what they do. The Koran and Hadith have a lot to say about the unbelievers " Making mischief in the land" (which is reason to kill them) simply means being unIslamic - rejecting the Koran - being an unbeliever and acting accordingly.
It seems it's always the fanatics that pour over scriptures, welding iron clad interpretations to justify shit that was never intended. The fact that you spend time, cross-checking passages between four versions of the Koran laid out in front of you in an obvious attempt to find evil in the meaning is actually a bit creepy.
[quote=Steve700]
Here are those two versus exactly the way they are worded including parentheses in my Koran which I got from Muslims who had a table set up where they were passing out Koran's and other Islamic literature:
8:38 Say to the disbelievers, if they stop themselves (from disbelief), their past (actions) would be forgiven them; But if they continue, the punishment of those before them is already (before them as a warning)
how can you interpret that as anything other than if you don't submit you will be slaughteredYou seem to think this is all about the disbelievers not believing in Islam. Maybe it's the context you were never able to find, but this is about the disbelievers not allowing anyone else to believe in Islam. Big difference. In the ancient world religions were political forces to be reckoned with and emerging religions were always attacked. Look at how the Romans reacted to Jews from Nazareth. 8:39 was Islam telling them to keep their faith and defend themselves if necessary.
[quote=Steve700]
8:39 And keep fighting them till there is no more unrest (commotion)or injustice. [color=red] You notice they are using the word commotion, which is what you have when people are refusing to submit to Islam's superior authority.
[/quote]
Commotion is also what you have when people continue to persecute and attack.
Steve700 wrote:
- it has nothing to do with being oppressed or victimized --
Billions of Muslims disagree with you.
Steve700 wrote:
as the next words portray, the Islamic idea of justice is that you submit and obey Allah[/color] and there exists justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they stop, surely, Allah sees all that they do. I memorized that verse yers ago from a different Koran and this is how it was worded at that time in the Koran I was reading. Quran 8:39 "Fight them until there is no more opposition and all submit and until there exists only one religion, Islam and Allah alone is worshiped". --- I think that makes it quite clear that Islam intends to rule the world.
br as the next words portray, the Islamic idea of... (
show quote)
I think what's clear is that you committed the wrong translation to memory and it fucked you up. No wonder your so confused.
Steve700 wrote:
And I have told you before that is the very reason Islam is called "The Religion Of Peace", because their agenda is to create world peace by forcing all the world to submit to Iaslam.
Yeah... you did tell me that before... and it was just as much bullshit then as it is now.
Steve700 wrote:
It is obvious you get your information from Muslim sources. Which is equivalent to a Jew getting his info about Nazism from a Nazi.
LOL... yeah NEVER get information about a religion from the people who follow it. I guess it's a good thing I don't go to church anymore.
Steve700 wrote:
Try Brigitte Gabriel, Walied Shoebat, (Muslim scholar and X terrorist now Christian)
Oh, an ex-terrorist... yeah, because people that are willing to kill innocent people for religious reasons couldn't possibly be insane.
Steve700 wrote:
Robert Spencer or
Http://www.thereligionofpeace.com -- There are many YouTube videos of the speaking engagements of these guys. . And read the companion book of the Koran, the Hadith (exploits, actions and sayings of Mohammed) to understand the horrifically brutal, savage and ungodly treatment Mohammed and Allah intended, and still intends for the unbeliever. Islamic perception and the way Muslims think is very different from the western mind.
It seems to me that you're the one that doesn't actually get that.
Steve700 wrote:
Have you ever considered that these people that you say hate Islam, may have damn good reason ??????????
Yes, I have considered it at length and I have concluded that they don't.