There are plenty of cases where that's true... mostly in cases of corruption involving the private sector, such as the rampant corruption of the military-industrial complex where we can find $7,000 hammers. But for the most part, government tends to be more transparent than the private sector which means the government is more exposed to public scrutiny and that's why it's errors are more prevalent the media which gives people the impression that it's more corrupt, when in reality corruption is far more rampant in the private sector but we just don't see it because unlike the government a private firm is "none of our fucking business".

To state "... Republican sponsored policies are responsible for almost every problem Republican voters bitch about and yet politicians always find a way (usually by lying) to blame it on Democrats..." proves you're lying long and hard...

There hasn't been a GOP HealthCare Policy in effect since 2007 when the Democrats took over Congress... The blame is put on the Democrats because for the past decade it's been the Democrats HealthCare Policies that are the only ones in effect...

Presently I am attempting to launch a class-action lawsuit against our federal government and all Liberal members of parliament, jointly and severally, for having STOLEN billions of dollars from the Canadian taxpayers in order to advance the criminal agenda of "climate change." Perhaps some enterprising conservative Americans could do likewise, for all manner of theft from the public treasury. I felt that the surest way to punish the fascists would be to attack the bastards personally, where it hurts the most - in their pocketbooks. Political intervention in the delivery of health care is immoral, stupid and wasteful. Obamacare needs to be abolished, period. Retaining some semblance of it merely kicks the can down the road. You may consider the lawsuit approach, as it would likely generate considerable publicity that the enemedia would otherwise ignore.

When politicians and media pundits on television discuss what's to become of Obamacare, the phase I keep hearing over and over is "repeal & replace." "Obamacare must be repealed & replaced ASAP!" The biggest argument these days seem to be around the 'replace' portion. What will Republicans replace the Affordable Care Act with ... and, how can they repeal Obamacare before they have something to replace it with.

Here's my question. Why does it need to be replaced with anything. When did repeal & replace become this nation's ONLY option. Why not just repeal it and go back to where we were 8 years ago. I don't remember the country clamoring after the government to take over our healthcare before Obama's lackeys came to power in 2009. Yes, there were issues regarding a small percentage of citizens who were uninsured, and an even smaller fraction of those who found themselves un-insurable. This issue needs to be studied to determine how best to help this 5-7% of the population. But when did we as a nation just settle on the fact that the Government must control and govern the healthcare of 350 million Americans in order to provide a safety net for the few?

Why not just repeal it - period. Go back to square one -- pre-2009 -- and fix what needed mending before the socialist came to power and stole one-seventh our nations GDP out from under us. Seems we're being brainwashed yet again. This time we're being told we can't repeal Obamacare before we have something to replace it with. They want everyone repeating the same phrase over and over instead of asking the question, WHY!? Why does the government need to be involved at all?

I'll tell you why ... because they created yet another entitlement program ... a program that has become unmanageable, unsustainable, and nearly impossible to back out of. And there isn't a single politician, Republican or Democrat, who wants to eliminate an entitlement program that garners them votes, power, and allows them control another layer of our lives.

I feel like a lone voice in the wilderness but I say "REPEAL ONLY - REPLACE WITH NOTHING!"

I'd like to hear from "repeal & replace" advocates why I'm wrong.

With the Democrats it's not so obvious. They tend to nominate experienced politicians with law degrees which is appropriate for leading a law-based government. It's clearly the Republicans that look for businessmen, Hollywood actors and hockey moms to try to make that popular connection which leaves actual government leadership in question.

JFK was the last Democratic president before the Southern conservatives left the party. I'm pretty familiar with the conservative tendency to see him as the last good Democrat. I suspect that has a LOT more to do with partisan loyalty than unbiased assessment. As for me, I'm still waiting for evidence to suggest Obama is anything other than a true leader.

Barry Jackson wrote:
Presently I am attempting to launch a class-action lawsuit against our federal government and all Liberal members of parliament, jointly and severally, for having STOLEN billions of dollars from the Canadian taxpayers in order to advance the criminal agenda of "climate change." Perhaps some enterprising conservative Americans could do likewise, for all manner of theft from the public treasury. I felt that the surest way to punish the fascists would be to attack the bastards personally, where it hurts the most - in their pocketbooks. Political intervention in the delivery of health care is immoral, stupid and wasteful. Obamacare needs to be abolished, period. Retaining some semblance of it merely kicks the can down the road. You may consider the lawsuit approach, as it would likely generate considerable publicity that the enemedia would otherwise ignore.

What is the bases of your allegation to theft??Is this a federal issue involving the country's choice to do this or that??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~•~~•••~~~
Are you filing it Federal Court??
Perhaps you should consider filing a Class Action lawsuit, with you as the controlling defendant..Of course it's handled differently too..In effect you would be suing representing the people of the state etc...

Without knowing more regarding the underling facts it's really hard to say..Just a thought you may wish to run by your attorney if they have not already suggested it.

Good luck, long tedious process that much I assure you...

Anthropogenic climate change is the biggest load of hooie that exists. Climate is constantly in change and has been since Earth developed an atmosphere. It will not stop until Earth loses its' atmosphere. A few things that change climate are Sun's energy cycles, Earth's distance from the Sun changed by the gravitation of Saturn and Jupiter, Earth's gyroscopic precession, cosmic rays and resultant cloud cover and more. Anthropogenic CO2 might, or might not, cause a change in average gobal temp. by about 0.24 deg. C.. Anyone think that such a change could drive anything?.

Hi L J. My problem with this entire Climate Change argument is their is no answer. Personally I believe man has no discernible impact on the climate. Air and water yes. That's something we can do something about. I could be wrong. So what? I haven't heard one viable option if I am wrong. Carbon credits so ass holes like Al Gore can make another fortune. Buzz words like renewables that are proven too costly and inefficient. Pay third world countries that have raw sewage running into the rivers, then the ocean billions because we have made their air dirty while they burn wood, coal, and buffalo chips. Don't forget the greatest Obama accomplishment the liberals pat themselves on the back for. Some BS non-binding UN climate agreement. Wow I'll bet the countries that hate us or don't care about their economy will honor that. If man made climate change is real the only way to stop it is get rid of man. I say liberals first. We're right behind you.

Hi L J. My problem with this entire Climate Change argument is their is no answer. Personally I believe man has no discernible impact on the climate. Air and water yes. That's something we can do something about. I could be wrong. So what? I haven't heard one viable option if I am wrong. Carbon credits so ass holes like Al Gore can make another fortune. Buzz words like renewables that are proven too costly and inefficient. Pay third world countries that have raw sewage running into the rivers, then the ocean billions because we have made their air dirty while they burn wood, coal, and buffalo chips. Don't forget the greatest Obama accomplishment the liberals pat themselves on the back for. Some BS non-binding UN climate agreement. Wow I'll bet the countries that hate us or don't care about their economy will honor that. If man made climate change is real the only way to stop it is get rid of man. I say liberals first. We're right behind you.