One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump thinks 3 Million illegals voted. Proof anyone?
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
Dec 5, 2016 22:50:54   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Richard94611 wrote:
While I believe your characteization of Progressive is incorrect, it has been my observation that Conservatives are confirmational thinkiners who either accept information if it confirms what they already believe and want to believe and reject any facts contrary to what they already wish to believe. This is true about climate change, certainly, and is true about Trump.


Speaking of Climate Change I just heard a man on Hannity talking about what Changers were saying 20 years ago. Had they been talking about the truth Alaska would be a sand covered desert now. If that is wrong take yourself back to that time and explain what is wrong about that logic. Climb down off your high chair and stop trying to protect progressive thinking.

Reply
Dec 5, 2016 23:12:52   #
Richard94611
 
Look, OldRoy, I know nothing about what someone said about Alaska and what people were saying 20 years ago, except what a group of about five people were saying when they were paid by corporations such as Exxon to deny the evidence of climate change, even though Exxon has since admitted that they were lying. This is well-documented. Hannity would not be my choice for reliable information. What I do know is that climate change/global warming is real, is serious, and is largely manmade. I know these things because I have read book after book on the subject and have taken two courses on the subject. After a lot of looking at the evidence pro and con, and noting that deniers of climate change/global warming use as evidence a series of illogical and/or irrelevant thoughts ("It is 'natural'") plus websites that were long ago proven to be deliberate misrepresentations, I have finally, after a prolonged exposure to both facts and lies, come to my conclusion about climate change/global warming. At this poinjt I must say, "Enough !" I have made a prolonged and serious intellectual effort to examine both sides and have come to my conclusion, just as every empiricist must do. I have done my research. I have come to my conclusions. And at this point I have to regard those who claim that climate change/global warming is not real, is not serious, and is not largely manmade are not open-minded enough to look at the evidence. For me, this conclusion is final. I have now entered the realm of being a "confirmational thinker" on the subject. And that's the way it is.


oldroy wrote:
Speaking of Climate Change I just heard a man on Hannity talking about what Changers were saying 20 years ago. Had they been talking about the truth Alaska would be a sand covered desert now. If that is wrong take yourself back to that time and explain what is wrong about that logic. Climb down off your high chair and stop trying to protect progressive thinking.

Reply
Dec 5, 2016 23:26:32   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Richard94611 wrote:
Look, OldRoy, I know nothing about what someone said about Alaska and what people were saying 20 years ago, except what a group of about five people were saying when they were paid by corporations such as Exxon to deny the evidence of climate change, even though Exxon has since admitted that they were lying. This is well-documented. Hannity would not be my choice for reliable information. What I do know is that climate change/global warming is real, is serious, and is largely manmade. I know these things because I have read book after book on the subject and have taken two courses on the subject. After a lot of looking at the evidence pro and con, and noting that deniers of climate change/global warming use as evidence a series of illogical and/or irrelevant thoughts ("It is 'natural'") plus websites that were long ago proven to be deliberate misrepresentations, I have finally, after a prolonged exposure to both facts and lies, come to my conclusion about climate change/global warming. At this poinjt I must say, "Enough !" I have made a prolonged and serious intellectual effort to examine both sides and have come to my conclusion, just as every empiricist must do. I have done my research. I have come to my conclusions. And at this point I have to regard those who claim that climate change/global warming is not real, is not serious, and is not largely manmade are not open-minded enough to look at the evidence. For me, this conclusion is final. I have now entered the realm of being a "confirmational thinker" on the subject. And that's the way it is.
Look, OldRoy, I know nothing about what someone sa... (show quote)


I would have thought from listening to changers that the whole east coast of the US would have water much higher at high tide than they did 20 years ago. When do the seas begin that horrendous rise that changers have been calling for?

Hey, you have studied this subject a lot more than I have but it seems to me that we have studied opposite sides of the "thing".

Reply
 
 
Dec 5, 2016 23:37:23   #
Richard94611
 
OldRoy, no, we have not studied opposite sides. As I stated very clearly in my post, I have studied both sides. At some point one must look at the evidence pro and con and make a decision. There is an enormolus amount of data out there, certainly far more than enough from both sides to make a decision about where one stands on the issue. A problem in the responses of people who deny climate change/global warming is that they misrepresent what is being said. Deniers try to claim that someone said the changes are going to be very, very quick, like living in the Sahara one year and the next year in the same place being up to one's ankles in ocean water. That isn't what is being said. Climate change/global warming is a long, slow, cumulative process that will affect your children and their children much more than it will affect you. Most deniers tend to emphsize some of the early pronouncemenets concerning climate change/global warming, many of which were in accurate because not enough time had elapsed and not enough data had been gathered, and also tend to exaggerate these early predictions greatly. They also tend to think that among the thousands of scientists who believe that climate change/global warming is real, is a serious threat to many people, and is largely manmade, that of the thousands and thousands of scientists working in this field, they are almost all dishonest and are lying. To call such a huge group of people all liars is unacceptable. I have looked at the evidence from both sides. I have made my decision about what is factual. And that is that.


oldroy wrote:
I would have thought from listening to changers that the whole east coast of the US would have water much higher at high tide than they did 20 years ago. When do the seas begin that horrendous rise that changers have been calling for?

Hey, you have studied this subject a lot more than I have but it seems to me that we have studied opposite sides of the "thing".

Reply
Dec 6, 2016 00:22:09   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Richard94611 wrote:
OldRoy, no, we have not studied opposite sides. As I stated very clearly in my post, I have studied both sides. At some point one must look at the evidence pro and con and make a decision. There is an enormolus amount of data out there, certainly far more than enough from both sides to make a decision about where one stands on the issue. A problem in the responses of people who deny climate change/global warming is that they misrepresent what is being said. Deniers try to claim that someone said the changes are going to be very, very quick, like living in the Sahara one year and the next year in the same place being up to one's ankles in ocean water. That isn't what is being said. Climate change/global warming is a long, slow, cumulative process that will affect your children and their children much more than it will affect you. Most deniers tend to emphsize some of the early pronouncemenets concerning climate change/global warming, many of which were in accurate because not enough time had elapsed and not enough data had been gathered, and also tend to exaggerate these early predictions greatly. They also tend to think that among the thousands of scientists who believe that climate change/global warming is real, is a serious threat to many people, and is largely manmade, that of the thousands and thousands of scientists working in this field, they are almost all dishonest and are lying. To call such a huge group of people all liars is unacceptable. I have looked at the evidence from both sides. I have made my decision about what is factual. And that is that.
OldRoy, no, we have not studied opposite sides. A... (show quote)


Have you given any thought to the old Hockey Stick crap that the early ones kept on about? Have you ever given any thought to the facts that came from conservative leaning scientists who worked for schools that didn't get any money from the UN? There us so much pure crap coming from schools that got huge grants to tell their tales and the opposite from those who didn't go along.

Hang in there Richard because I plan to.

Reply
Dec 6, 2016 09:45:11   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Richard94611 wrote:
While I believe your characteization of Progressive is incorrect, it has been my observation that Conservatives are confirmational thinkiners who either accept information if it confirms what they already believe and want to believe and reject any facts contrary to what they already wish to believe. This is true about climate change, certainly, and is true about Trump.


The difference is in who believes in Truth and who is the liar; which of the two sides believes evil is good? You may begin with your side advocating the intentional murder of 58 million completely and totally innocent unborn children.

Reply
Dec 6, 2016 19:16:19   #
Homestead
 
Richard94611 wrote:
While I believe your characteization of Progressive is incorrect, it has been my observation that Conservatives are confirmational thinkiners who either accept information if it confirms what they already believe and want to believe and reject any facts contrary to what they already wish to believe. This is true about climate change, certainly, and is true about Trump.


There is no man made climate change and insisting that there is does not create it.

Maunder-minimum
Dr.'s Don Easterbrook, Roy Spencer, "Willie" Soon, S. Fred Singer, Lord Moncton,

View Full Version: The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
http://z4.invisionfree.com/Popular_Technology/ar/t2050.htm


Antarctic Expeditions Confirm No Global Warming
December 2, 2016 7:49 pm
http://www.teaparty.org/antarctic-expeditions-confirm-no-global-warming-204165/


31,487 American scientists have signed this petition,
including 9,029 with PhDs
http://www.petitionproject.org/

The great global warming swindle - Full version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELfQ7FI6Zoc

Major Researchers Caught Lying to Boost Obama Climate Rules; Liars Want to Use Fed’s RICO to Criminalize Truth
http://joemiller.us/2015/06/major-researchers-caught-lying-to-boost-obama-climate-rules-liars-want-to-use-feds-rico-to-criminalize-truth/?utm_source=JoeMiller.US+List&utm_campaign=6221c504f4-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_065b6c381c-6221c504f4-230980933

The Great Global Warming Swindle - Full Movie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-m09lKtYT4

GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX
Lenar Whitney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BzItCPk5j4#t=254

Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI#t=40

Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI
How the Global Warming Scare Began
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyUDGfCNC-k
Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. Lecture Deconstructs Global Warming Hysteria (High Quality Version) (excellent coverage)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sHg3ZztDAw
Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-
Debunking the 97% 'consensus' on global warming
a Canada-based group calling itself Friends of Science has just completed a review of the four main studies used to document the alleged consensus and found that only 1 - 3% of respondents "explicitly stated agreement with the IPCC declarations on global warming," and that there was "no agreement with a catastrophic view."
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-40661-35.html#1426042


Antarctic ice shelf melt 'lowest EVER recorded, global warming is NOT eroding it' Jan 3, 2014
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/03/antarctic_ice_shelf_melt_lowest_ever_recorded_just_not_much_affected_by_global_warming/
***********************************************************************************
Ice | Global Climate Scam ( 36 non global warming stories )
(1) Update: Melting permafrost and Global Warming
http://www.enn.com/ecosystems/article/47608
(2) Evidence Shows Geothermal Activity Linked To West Antarctic Ice Melt
(12/19/2014)
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/evidence-shows-geothermal-activity-linked-to-west-antarctic-ice-melt.html
(3) Scientists Admit Polar Bear Numbers Were Made Up
(4) Climate Change Scammers' Worst Week Ever
(5) Global Warming and the Polar Vortex
(6) Antarctic ice shelf melt 'lowest EVER recorded, global warming is NOT eroding it'
(7) Eleven Global Warming Stories From 2013 You Probably Never Heard Of
(8) Global warming? Satellite data shows Arctic sea ice coverage up 50 percent!
(9) Global Warming Skeptic Buries Sierra Club Director under Avalanche of Facts
(10) Cold dis-comfort: Antarctica set record of -135.8
(11) Sun’s Bizarre Activity may Trigger Another Ice Age
(12) Global Population of Polar Bears has Increased by 2,500 – 5,700 since 2001
(13) AP: Global Warming Means More Arctic Ice?
(14) The Himalayas and Nearby Peaks have Lost No Ice in Past 10 Years, Study Shows
(15) Forget global warming – it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)
(16) Antarctic ice formed at CO2 levels much higher than today's
(17) North Pole ‘Melting?’: Global Warming Alarmists Launch ‘Santa is Drowning’ Campaign to Raise Cash
(18) White Coke Cans Fund Polar Bear Myths
(19) Global Warming Link to Drowned Polar Bears Melts Under Searing Fed Probe
(20) Junk Science Unravels
(21) Probably not the "hottest year"
(22) Scientist: Arctic ice melt natural
(23) Rajendra Pachauri to defend handling of IPCC after climate change science row
(24) India Forms New Climate Change Body
(25) IPCC chief Rajendra Pachauri under pressure to go over glacier error
(26) The Hottest Hoax in the World
(27) Director of IPCC Knew Glacier Claim Was False Before Announcing Grants
(28) Can Climate Forecasts Still Be Trusted?
(29) United Nations' Climate Chief Must Go
(30) The New Climate Change Scandal
(31) The Mini Ice Age Starts Here
(32) Sea icy off part of Antarctica despite fear of melt
(33) Hockey Stick over Time – Narrated
(34) India 'arrogant' to deny global warming link to melting glaciers
(35) Antarctic Ice Melt at Lowest Levels in Satellite Era
(36) Arctic Sea Ice Not Following Consensus
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/category/ice/
***********************************************************************
NYT: Scientists 'Startled' at Great Lakes' Rise; Another Warmist Prediction Is Biting the Dust
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2014/06/30/nyt-scientists-startled-great-lakes-rise-another-warmist-prediction-biti#ixzz36Girgpjt
Al Gore's Inconvenient SCAM, Lies versus Lord Monckton Truth and Logic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElEwhE7B-8o#t=309

5 Scientific Reasons That Global Warming Isn't Happening
http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/02/18/5-scientific-reasons-that-global-warming-isnt-happening-n1796423/page/full

Charles Krauthammer Destroys Global Warming Myths in 89 Seconds
http://blog.heritage.org/2014/02/18/charles-krauthammer-destroys-global-warming-myths-89-seconds/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=&amp;utm_content=&utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=afternoon1_140218

California’s Man-Made Drought – Dick Morris TV: Lunch Alert!
http://www.dickmorris.com/californias-man-made-drought-dick-morris-tv-lunch-alert/?utm_source=dmreports&utm_medium=dmreports&utm_campaign=dmreports

All Fools' Eve 2014: The day democracy died
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/all-fools-eve-2014-the-day-democracy-died/#Cp4c2gdIJ3deSZYh.99

Harvard's Faustian bargain dooms it to irrelevance
Exclusive: Lord Monckton challenges university president to climate-change debate
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/harvards-faustian-bargain-dooms-it-to-irrelevance/#1CCrbWKXkQ27X6AS.99

Alaskan Polar Bears Threatened…By Too Much Spring Ice
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/alaskan-polar-bears-threatened-too-much-spring-ice-0

George Carlin on Global Warming (comic)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1422579428&x-yt-cl=85114404&v=BB0aFPXr4n4

I love CO2, Carbon dioxide(CO2)
http://www.iloveco2.com/p/about-co2.html

Pie Graphs of Composition of Gases In the Atmosphere
http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=A0LEVxL3B2pV3soA901XNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEyMHZsYmhvBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQjAyNjRfMQRzZWMDc2M-?p=Pie+Graph+of+Composition+of+Gases+In+the+Atmosphere&fr=yfp-t-901-s

*********************************************************************************

Blog post:

The threat of environmental crisis is the 'international disaster key' to unlock the New World Order." - Mikhail Gorbachev

"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." - Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports 

"Unless we announce disasters no one will listen." - Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC

"It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true." - Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

"We've got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy." - Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony... climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world." - Christine Stewart, fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment

"The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe." - emeritus professor Daniel Botkin

"Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programmer

"Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it." - Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

"Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun." - Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
*********************************************************************************

Forums:

Now you are talking about the REAL cause of climate change -- the sun.

Just as the sun warms the earth every morning, and cools at night, the suns long-term changing activity is responsible for long-term changing temperature on earth. The Maunder Minimum is a prime example of the sun's effect on earth. The Maunder Minimum was an extended period (1600 to early 1700s) of minimal solar activity. It corresponded with the coldest part of the Little Ice Age that lasted from 1350 to 1850. The Dalton Minimum in the early 1800s represents the last gasp of the Little Ice Age. After that, solar activity rose, lifting earth out of the Little Ice Age into a warming period that continues today. Please study the first chart below. Note that the most extreme solar activity occurred after 1950, corresponding with the global warming that alarmists are blaming on CO2.

Solar activity appears to have a long-term cycle lasting about 100 years and a short-term cycle lasting an average of 11 years. The high part of the long-term cycle is in the second half of the century, while the low is in the first half. The recent fall-off in activity (since 2000) is likely responsible for recent cooling, and may be the early stage of an extended cooling period that could last far into the first half of the 21st century. The eleven-year cycle may help illustrate this (second chart). Rather than turning up at the end of 11 years, solar activity continued to decline, reaching 13 years. During those two extra years of decline, the earth's cooling witnessed greatly expanded ice on both poles. Also, we saw record snowfall in Boston and the coldest winter in northeast cities in 37 years.

The good news is, the solar downturn ended in late 2013 and is slowly turning back up. El Nino is slowly forming over the Pacific and could finally bring rain to California and warmth to the northeast. It will prevent the cold arctic blasts from dropping so far down across the northeast. That could bring us seven or eight years of relief, but the eleven-year cycle will have us back in the freezer by 2024. And it could be even colder as the long-term solar cycle deepens.

If there is any truth to the warming effect of greenhouse gases, we need to burn a lot of fossil fuels to help get us through this 50-year cooling period.







Scientific facts which relates to Global-Warming i.e. Climate Change that should be acknowledge.

The "Sun" is the number one, prime motivator for heat in our solar system. Without the sun's solar radiation waves the Earth would be a lifeless star. Their are many scientific facts about the Global Warming that have occurred on the planet Earth over the past 4-plus billion years since the origination of life on earth.

The earth has had numerous ice ages and global warming periods.

Antarctic and Greenland "Ice-Core" samples. With the use of electronic mass-spectrometer and carbon dating of these Ice-Core samples, we can prove when Global Warming and Global Cooling Change has happened on Earth and when they have occurred. We also have the scientific periodic table of elements. i.e. Different kinds elemental “atom's” are embedded in the "Ice-Core" samples taken by scientists and analyzed.

Other physical scientific evidence are the geological “Ice-Ages” and the geological scaring of the Earth's surface caused by "Ice-Glaciers" sheets and occurrence's of Global Cooling.

Since the beginning of earth's formation, there has been many changes in tectonic continental plate and shifting tectonic plates, notably called "Pangaea-Theory" and subsequent glacial ice sheets ages, which has formed the geological surface of the earth many times over.

Another major factor of Global Warming - Global Cooling is that the earth is a celestial star in our solar system.

What is the temperature of outer space, the space outside earth's atmosphere ?

It's minus -270.15 degrees Celsius or minus -457.87 degrees Fahrenheit. Thats really cold, no life forms are able to survive.

To sustain life the earth’s temperature cannot exceed boiling point of water, at 103 C or (217 F), most life on Earth would be extinct, in particular complex life forms at this temperature would be extinct.

To sustain ambient life forms such as plants, the Earths temperature could not less than O degrees Fahrenheit. This is called "The Goldilocks" effect principle, "Not to hot to not to cold."

The highest recorded temperature on earth was 70.7° Celsius, or 159° Fahrenheit in the Iraq desert. While the lowest recorded temperature on earth was in Antarctica -89.2° Celsius, or -129° Fahrenheit.

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2016 23:57:53   #
fullspinzoo
 
padremike wrote:
Even your idiot, cop killing president, acknowledges FOX is the enemy and blames them for Hillary losing the election. FYI - the number of liberals and independents who watch FOX exceed the number of Conservatives. FOX is the only honest, fair and balanced news channel and since you wouldn't ever recognize truth how could you be expected to understand fair and balanced?

Perfectly said, padremike!

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 07:52:45   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
These weasels have been wrong for 20 years.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 11
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.