Phantom votes for trump discovered
Nov 30, 2016 01:54:00 #
moldyoldy wrote:
I am sure that you got that from a reliable source.
I did. All you have to do is look.
Oh....you don't want to. I forgot.
Loser.
Nov 30, 2016 01:56:49 #
BigMike wrote:
It is if you're appealing to complete fools...which our schools are graduating at an alarming rate.
If she is a product I'd have to agree. With $3.5M going to WI there won't be much left to steal and she has to pay two more states before she can even stall.beyond the deadline.
Nov 30, 2016 08:41:02 #
moldyoldy wrote:
I am sure that you got that from a reliable source.
One of yours.
Nov 30, 2016 21:26:12 #
Docadhoc wrote:
If she is a product I'd have to agree. With $3.5M going to WI there won't be much left to steal and she has to pay two more states before she can even stall.beyond the deadline.
Too late! Going nowhere! Add that to the hag's $40 billion bill!
Dec 1, 2016 01:06:26 #
BigMike wrote:
Too late! Going nowhere! Add that to the hag's $40 billion bill!
Ain't it the truth! Looks like she blew the recount filing date in Pennsylvania by more than a week. And.people wonder how she lost?
Dec 1, 2016 21:26:11 #
Docadhoc wrote:
Ain't it the truth! Looks like she blew the recount filing date in Pennsylvania by more than a week. And.people wonder how she lost?
She only said one smart thing the whole time she ran.
Dec 1, 2016 21:49:49 #
Docadhoc wrote:
Ain't it the truth! Looks like she blew the recount filing date in Pennsylvania by more than a week. And.people wonder how she lost?
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsin-first-state-to-start-presidential-election-recount/ar-AAkZplE?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
Dec 1, 2016 22:11:00 #
moldyoldy wrote:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsin-first-state-to-start-presidential-election-recount/ar-AAkZplE?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
From your article:
"Donald Trump narrowly beat Hillary Clinton in all three states, but recounts were not expected to flip nearly enough votes to change the outcome in any of the states."
He beat her by over 70k votes in PA. That's not narrowly beating someone, that's handing them their head.
Dec 2, 2016 02:21:19 #
moldyoldy wrote:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsin-first-state-to-start-presidential-election-recount/ar-AAkZplE?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
Let me ask you moldy.
Not one of the WI machines are on line so how could they be hacked?
Dec 2, 2016 06:34:42 #
Docadhoc wrote:
Let me ask you moldy.
Not one of the WI machines are on line so how could they be hacked?
Not one of the WI machines are on line so how could they be hacked?
Moldy can't answer ,, you stumped him ,, give the guy a couple of days for a come back ,,
Dec 2, 2016 07:07:47 #
reconreb wrote:
Moldy can't answer ,, you stumped him ,, give the guy a couple of days for a come back ,,
And a lame on at that.
Dec 2, 2016 10:10:23 #
Worried for our children wrote:
From your article:
"Donald Trump narrowly beat Hillary Clinton in all three states, but recounts were not expected to flip nearly enough votes to change the outcome in any of the states."
He beat her by over 70k votes in PA. That's not narrowly beating someone, that's handing them their head.
"Donald Trump narrowly beat Hillary Clinton in all three states, but recounts were not expected to flip nearly enough votes to change the outcome in any of the states."
He beat her by over 70k votes in PA. That's not narrowly beating someone, that's handing them their head.
There were 8.5 million voters in Pa. in 2012, much higher now. 70K is a drop in the bucket.
Dec 2, 2016 10:15:56 #
Docadhoc wrote:
Let me ask you moldy.
Not one of the WI machines are on line so how could they be hacked?
Not one of the WI machines are on line so how could they be hacked?
You idiots have been claiming voter fraud for many years. This is the first time that facts don't add up. It is not my job to tell you how it was hacked, there are experts for that. The real crime was voter suppression and purging of registered voters. The many lawsuits will not be heard until long after the election. Too late for the real winner to be put in place.
Dec 2, 2016 10:50:28 #
moldyoldy wrote:
There were 8.5 million voters in Pa. in 2012, much higher now. 70K is a drop in the bucket.
Lmao!!😂😂😂
Not when you lose by that many.
You'll be okay, moldy, keep pushing the recount nonsense, you and Rayon are the only two who think it's going to change anything. 🙄
Dec 2, 2016 10:50:59 #
moldyoldy wrote:
.You idiots have been claiming voter fraud for many years. This is the first time that facts don't add up. It is not my job to tell you how it was hacked, there are experts for that. The real crime was voter suppression and purging of registered voters. The many lawsuits will not be heard until long after the election. Too late for the real winner to be put in place.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.