when we are finally rid of thoes danmm guns
Jul 1, 2016 10:21:40 #
Glaucon wrote:
Anything that divides Americans makes us weaker and you want to aggravate half or out country, Sounds un-American to me.
Yep just like Obama has divided half the country in one term then divided another 25% the next term.
Jul 1, 2016 10:43:08 #
PawneeCounty wrote:
Yep just like Obama has divided half the country in one term then divided another 25% the next term.
Why is it Obama is so popular? Is it possible that most Americans know something you don't? Emote about that possibility.
Jul 1, 2016 10:45:16 #
PawneeCounty wrote:
Yep just like Obama has divided half the country in one term then divided another 25% the next term.
Do you actually imagine Obama divided our country ALL BY HIMSELF? Emote about that for awhile.
Jul 1, 2016 10:52:17 #
Glaucon wrote:
Do you actually imagine Obama divided our country ALL BY HIMSELF? Emote about that for awhile.
No he had plenty of help from ABC, NBC, and CBS along with the NY Times, Huffington Post, and Washington Post just to name a few.
Jul 1, 2016 11:38:03 #
PawneeCounty wrote:
No he had plenty of help from ABC, NBC, and CBS along with the NY Times, Huffington Post, and Washington Post just to name a few.
They publish the news and that has been very helpful to Obama. They also provide commentary from various points of view. Their facts are constantly checked for accuracy. If you believe that Sarah Palin attacks on our news sources, you are part of the problem and have been Trumped big time.
Jul 1, 2016 11:52:03 #
Glaucon wrote:
They publish the news and that has been very helpful to Obama. They also provide commentary from various points of view. Their facts are constantly checked for accuracy. If you believe that Sarah Palin attacks on our news sources, you are part of the problem and have been Trumped big time.
It isn't what they report it is what they omit that is biased.
Jul 1, 2016 11:56:03 #
Glaucon wrote:
Anything that divides Americans makes us weaker and you want to aggravate half or out country, Sounds un-American to me.
Considering your basic in-civility, your statement is at least ironic and is just plain wrong. At the risk of verbosity, I'll explain. Competition is at the base of ALL living creatures. It doesn't make anyone weaker to disagree. In the world of ideas, division, competition and disagreement make you examine your ideas. For instance, the basic difference between present day liberals and conservatives (and libertarians like myself) is: Liberals think it is fine to take the fruits of another man's labor at the point of a gun and give it to the person of THEIR choice. Conservatives want to either keep their labor (money) or trade with others in mutual cooperation. Or give it to the person of their choice. An example is abortion. I don't think a nickle of my money should be spent killing babies. I don't care if a woman (not my wife) wants to kill their baby. I just don't want my money spent on it. Liberals think of people as burdens to be taken care of. Conservatives think of people as assets. Things to be cherished and dealt with in mutual respect.
Let's make it simple. If you came to my house with a gun, and made me feed the squirrels in my back yard, eventually I will run out of money to buy corn. At that point, all the fat, stupid, lazy squirrels will have to go in search of nuts, or die. I will die because you took all my money to feed squirrels. Here's hoping the squirrels have to fight for their nuts. It will make them stronger and smarter. Hopefully, our discussions will do the same for you and me.
Jul 1, 2016 11:56:32 #
PawneeCounty wrote:
It isn't what they report it is what they omit that is biased.
They seem to omit all of the baseless, fact-free right wing talking points....seems fair to me.
Jul 1, 2016 11:59:31 #
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
Considering your basic in-civility, your statement... (show quote)
See my response to PawneeCounty.....applies to you also.
Jul 1, 2016 13:02:38 #
PawneeCounty wrote:
It isn't what they report it is what they omit that is biased.
What do you believe was omitted form what, for what purpose and by whom?
Jul 1, 2016 13:09:00 #
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
Considering your basic in-civility, your statement... (show quote)
You risked verbosity and lost, but we thank you for offering what is a grossly over simplified and distorted explanation of reality. Proving that commons sense is really not very common.
Jul 1, 2016 13:17:17 #
Glaucon wrote:
You risked verbosity and lost, but we thank you for offering what is a grossly over simplified and distorted explanation of reality. Proving that commons sense is really not very common.
Considering the incivility and emptiness of your reply, I stand by everything I said. Please add me to your ignore list. You made mine.
Jul 1, 2016 16:19:33 #
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
Considering the incivility and emptiness of your reply, I stand by everything I said. Please add me to your ignore list. You made mine.
Gee Gluestick has lost yet another friend,well that leaves him at none.
Jul 1, 2016 20:59:05 #
Hemiman wrote:
Gee Gluestick has lost yet another friend,well that leaves him at none.
Not much of a loss, eh?
Jul 2, 2016 04:06:50 #
MatthewlovesAyn wrote:
Considering the incivility and emptiness of your reply, I stand by everything I said. Please add me to your ignore list. You made mine.
Wimp!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.