ICYMI: After Frying Thousands Of Birds, World’s Largest Solar Farm Catches Fire--Part 2
May 22, 2016 11:45:12 #
Little Ball of Hate posted this topic and put me on his ignore list so I wouldn't be able to refute the comments and the article itself.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/05/21/icymi-after-frying-thousands-of-birds-worlds-largest-solar-farm-catches-fire-n2166718
Townhall is an ultra-conservative website most likely funded and authored by the oil, gas and nuclear industries. If you check out the sources given to back up the article's claims, you will be directed to other Townhall articles. Townhall appears to be the only source posting this bogus information.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/05/21/icymi-after-frying-thousands-of-birds-worlds-largest-solar-farm-catches-fire-n2166718
Townhall is an ultra-conservative website most likely funded and authored by the oil, gas and nuclear industries. If you check out the sources given to back up the article's claims, you will be directed to other Townhall articles. Townhall appears to be the only source posting this bogus information.
May 22, 2016 11:59:10 #
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/20/worlds-largest-solar-thermal-power-plant-22b-calif/
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-solar-plant-fire-20160520-snap-story.html
http://www.computerworld.com/article/3073130/sustainable-it/mirrors-start-fire-at-worlds-largest-solar-plant.html
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2016/may/19/misaligned-mirrors-blamed-for-fire-at-california/
If you don't want your status as 'political hack' to so obvious, try a quick 'Google Search'.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-solar-plant-fire-20160520-snap-story.html
http://www.computerworld.com/article/3073130/sustainable-it/mirrors-start-fire-at-worlds-largest-solar-plant.html
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2016/may/19/misaligned-mirrors-blamed-for-fire-at-california/
If you don't want your status as 'political hack' to so obvious, try a quick 'Google Search'.
May 22, 2016 12:18:45 #
payne1000 wrote:
Little Ball of Hate posted this topic and put me o... (show quote)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep I've driven past that one and the other ones plenty of times... All the time.
close em' down for all I care !
Who Cares
Fuck em' !
May 22, 2016 13:20:41 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
If they work I'm all for them.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep I've driven past that one and the other ones plenty of times... All the time.
close em' down for all I care !
Who Cares
Fuck em' !
Yep I've driven past that one and the other ones plenty of times... All the time.
close em' down for all I care !
Who Cares
Fuck em' !
May 22, 2016 13:21:47 #
Super Dave wrote:
If they work I'm all for them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ok but do they work ? Without frying the poor birds ?
May 22, 2016 13:24:59 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
Not efficiently. We kill birds and fish and mammals all the time for energy. I'm not going to go hypocrite. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ok but do they work ? Without frying the poor birds ?
Ok but do they work ? Without frying the poor birds ?
If someone invented as viable solar collection method it wouldn't need government money.
May 22, 2016 13:26:16 #
Super Dave wrote:
Not efficiently. We kill birds and fish and mammals all the time for energy. I'm not going to go hypocrite.
If someone invented as viable solar collection method it wouldn't need government money.
If someone invented as viable solar collection method it wouldn't need government money.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Prettymuch.
May 22, 2016 14:27:48 #
Super Dave wrote:
Why waste my time on the research when I know I can get you to do it for me?
May 22, 2016 14:29:36 #
Super Dave wrote:
If they work I'm all for them.
They work and once the up front costs are paid, all the energy they produce is free.
May 22, 2016 14:31:11 #
Super Dave wrote:
Not efficiently. We kill birds and fish and mammals all the time for energy. I'm not going to go hypocrite.
If someone invented as viable solar collection method it wouldn't need government money.
If someone invented as viable solar collection method it wouldn't need government money.
Without government subsidies, nuclear power plants would not exist.
May 22, 2016 14:33:11 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ok but do they work ? Without frying the poor birds ?
Ok but do they work ? Without frying the poor birds ?
Windows are the greatest killer of birds.
House cats are next.
If you are concerned about birds, cover all your windows and cage your cats.
May 22, 2016 14:55:25 #
payne1000 wrote:
Windows are the greatest killer of birds.
House cats are next.
If you are concerned about birds, cover all your windows and cage your cats.
House cats are next.
If you are concerned about birds, cover all your windows and cage your cats.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I really don't care about any of it.
May 22, 2016 23:12:28 #
payne1000 wrote:
LOLThey work and once the up front costs are paid, all the energy they produce is free.
IOW.... The only problem with them is that they cost more than the value of the energy they render.. Why let a problem that small get in the way of something?
FYI - In addition to up-front costs they also require maintenance and must be replaced at some point.
May 23, 2016 08:12:39 #
Super Dave wrote:
LOL
IOW.... The only problem with them is that they cost more than the value of the energy they render.. Why let a problem that small get in the way of something?
FYI - In addition to up-front costs they also require maintenance and must be replaced at some point.
IOW.... The only problem with them is that they cost more than the value of the energy they render.. Why let a problem that small get in the way of something?
FYI - In addition to up-front costs they also require maintenance and must be replaced at some point.
The up front costs are less than nuclear, coal and gas turbine power plants, All power plants require replacement at some point.
All power generation plants besides wind and solar pollute the environment.
Do you have any sources other than Townhall to back up your claim that they cost more than the energy they render?
Surely you meant to say nuclear power instead of solar.
May 23, 2016 08:20:21 #
payne1000 wrote:
The up front costs are less than nuclear, coal and gas turbine power plants, All power plants require replacement at some point.
All power generation plants besides wind and solar pollute the environment.
Do you have any sources other than Townhall to back up your claim that they cost more than the energy they render?
Surely you meant to say nuclear power instead of solar.
All power generation plants besides wind and solar pollute the environment.
Do you have any sources other than Townhall to back up your claim that they cost more than the energy they render?
Surely you meant to say nuclear power instead of solar.
Nuclear coal gad and oil render a whole lot more energy than dollar per dollar invested. They are actually economically viable. That's why companies make money obtaining and processing them after being taxed.
The undeniable proof that fossil fuels are are viable is found in the free market. I guess you didn't think to look there.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.