One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Political--- What's the biggest lie wev'e been told?
Page <<first <prev 17 of 18 next>
May 24, 2016 11:45:17   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
payne1000 wrote:
Did you fail science and physics? Compressed air forces itself out. The hundreds of tons of steel and concrete follow the force of gravity--straight down--unless another greater force is applied.
______________________________________


Those two explosions do not look alike. There is no outward flow at the point of collapse except on the tower.

Reply
May 24, 2016 11:45:33   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
bill horn wrote:
This is a political question. this is a political site, please leave in main. thank you

The Roswell story


The most believable story in my eye is.
Russian craft with two German experiments riding. Part of cold war effort.

Reply
May 24, 2016 14:31:07   #
payne1000
 
Louie27 wrote:
Those two explosions do not look alike. There is no outward flow at the point of collapse except on the tower.


No two explosions are identical. The debris clouds coming out of the top of both explosive events are very similar.
A tower collapsing from fire damage would follow the force of gravity and fall as straight down as is possible.
Powerful explosives is the only explanation of why the debris would be propelled 600 ft sideways on the North and South Tower.

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2016 10:51:19   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
payne1000 wrote:
No two explosions are identical. The debris clouds coming out of the top of both explosive events are very similar.
A tower collapsing from fire damage would follow the force of gravity and fall as straight down as is possible.
Powerful explosives is the only explanation of why the debris would be propelled 600 ft sideways on the North and South Tower.


You must have been looking at some other explosions. They are not identical.

Reply
May 26, 2016 10:59:26   #
payne1000
 
Louie27 wrote:
You must have been looking at some other explosions. They are not identical.


Louie, you have no reading comprehension.
I said the explosions were not identical. But they do have similarities which are the identifying characteristics of explosions.

Reply
May 26, 2016 11:00:32   #
kburns50
 
Goober says Hey........ Say hey to Goober......

Reply
May 26, 2016 11:08:22   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
son of witless wrote:
Skyscrapers are not trees. It is possible to bring a building straight down, as is commonly done in controlled explosive demolitions. Has anyone ever brought a tree straight down? Welllllll?

I already posted a link to a site giving the engineering aspect of the towers collapse. It makes sense to me. It seems to me your problem is mainly the straight vertical collapse. Why didn't they collapse sideways?

That has been explained. Now you give me your version. Did someone plant explosives on the support beams the way a controlled building demolition is done? Stop telling me that what happened was not possible. Give me your alternate theory, and I want exact details.
Skyscrapers are not trees. It is possible to bring... (show quote)


If you were to pay attention to the exact details you wouldn't need them from me.
Sometimes blind faith is.

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2016 11:13:14   #
kburns50
 
Most respectable people are in bed asleep by 9:30pm.

Reply
May 26, 2016 20:58:00   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Louie27 wrote:
You must have been looking at some other explosions. They are not identical.


Does not fire often weaken one side of a building before, and more than the other side? Would not that then cause the building to fall toward the more weakened side?

Reply
May 26, 2016 21:08:53   #
payne1000
 
Docadhoc wrote:
Does not fire often weaken one side of a building before, and more than the other side? Would not that then cause the building to fall toward the more weakened side?


Look at this photo and tell readers which is the weak side.



Reply
May 26, 2016 21:10:33   #
PeterS
 
bill horn wrote:
This is a political question. this is a political site, please leave in main. thank you

The Roswell story


That Iraq had WMD. We will be paying for that lie for generations...

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2016 21:28:17   #
payne1000
 
PeterS wrote:
That Iraq had WMD. We will be paying for that lie for generations...


Why do you ignore the much bigger lie?

Reply
May 27, 2016 01:47:50   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
payne1000 wrote:
Look at this photo and tell readers which is the weak side.


I didn't tell anyone anything. I asked you a question.

Reply
May 27, 2016 01:50:55   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
PeterS wrote:
That Iraq had WMD. We will be paying for that lie for generations...


So you're another one denying the 5,000 found by the Marines. Okay. Just don't be surprised by the way people talk to.you.

Reply
May 27, 2016 01:52:56   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
payne1000 wrote:
Why do you ignore the much bigger lie?


Right. You two need to fight it out over whose butt is bent out of shape worse.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 17 of 18 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.