payne1000

You ignore the third tower which fell on 9/11. It fell showing all the characteristics of a controlled demolition.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9u1xGeitPk

payne1000

Firefighter Eric Lawyer explains why the rushed removal of the steel at the WTC crime scene was to destroy evidence of controlled demolition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADygllD35t0

JONDO

It took a madman to blow our country apart, Its going to take another madman to bring it back together again, i said a mad man Not a blithering idiot who is always on vacation.

payne1000

That's "Madmen". The three most obvious perps were Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush. They were working for a secret cabal of international bankers and weapons corporations. Exposing the truth about 9/11 is the only way to bring these mass murderers to justice.

Liberty Tree

"Zionist" is just the code name you use to try and mask your anti-Semitism.

jasfourth401

With all due respect I disagree. The photo you show reaffirms the catastrophic floor failures as its design would allow. That is to say these towers were constructed using framed tube design. What that means is that the facade bore the load enabling each floor to remove most of the support columns (open floor plan gets higher rents). The other critical strength component was its central core of columns and fire exits/elevator shafts.

When the plane breached the facade wall, it instantly doomed the building. If the plane then headed toward the central core of columns it would only further weaken the structure.

You'll note that in the photo the exterior of the building was falling first, followed by the central core. This is consistent with an internal implosion (not explosion) where the building collapses into itself.

Further, it is instructive to note each floor was one acre in size, meaning 20 acres of tightly spaced cubicles full of paper, carpet, computers, etc. was sitting on top on a few compromised floors. This massive weight would further focus collapse within the defined building footprint.

payne1000

The argument you're making is straight out of the troll handbook. Listen to what a famous aeronautical and nuclear engineer has to say about the fall of the towers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_4X8OVL5vo

payne1000

jasfourth401

I have no need to view anything. I would also ask you to refrain from snarky remarks about trolls.

I worked for the company that published Engineering News Record. That magazine has covered these buildings since they started coming out of the ground.

On the day of attack, one of the engineers walked up to the television screen showing the gash and after taking a ruler to the screen, immediately determined the size of the first plane. And then he said the building would fall in about an hour. He knew those buildings cold. And these are the opinions and facts I rely on...from the ones with intimate knowledge of how they were designed.

payne1000

Lead WTC engineering designer John Skilling disagrees with your anonymous engineer: "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19930227&slug=1687698

vernon

they build these floors on the ground and raise them to the proper hight then they do it again.when you have a plane loaded with thousands of gals of fuel hit the thing and the inferno that this caused the floors will pancake,they arnt made to support the weight coming down.

payne1000

Extreme ignorance is self-refuting.

vernon

yes and you are living proof .

Liberty Tree

He also believes the Zionists blew up the north wall at the Alamo because they had made an agreement with Santa Anna to turn part of Texas into a Zionist state.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

OK, payne, I am not sure if I do know what a Zionist is..

What is the correct description of a Zionist?