Loki wrote:
That is the reason that while I support open carry, I almost never do it myself. Why give the criminal the advantage of surprise? If he is determined to use deadly force, does it not make sense to start with someone who is visibly armed when he has the jump? It is also a matter of common courtesy. We have hoplophobes amongst us. Can't go around scaring them, now, can we? There is also the matter of some people who carry openly have that unmistakeable "Look at me, I'm a badass" swagger that makes me want to smack their dumb asses. These are the people the anti-gunners think we all are. The ones who see deadly force as a first choice, rather than a last resort. I digress. As far as I am concerned, the first clue, or warning a criminal bent on using deadly force should have that I am armed should, ideally, be a bright flash and a loud bang.
That is the reason that while I support open carry... (
show quote)