jelun

I think that this author is doing the same thing that he is suggesting others are doing.
Rolling Stone is NOT millennial activists so to use that periodical to make a point about social justice volunteers is misleading.
This is what makes me uncomfortable about his piece. He pulled one statement out of a piece written by Zerlina Maxwell in which she was indicating that it is reasonable to "generally" believe a survivor of rape.
He neglected to include her further statements available here.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/06/no-matter-what-jackie-said-we-should-automatically-believe-rape-claims/

Nothing shrill, it is an opinion piece, period.

That is what struck me the other night as wrong with his position, I think. Striking out at the same things that he does.
Striking out at the same thing we all do, it is impossible to cover all aspects of a subject. So naturally we use those those support the point we are making.