One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
"Grab them by the pu$$y" Trump - finally has to pay for the privilege of doing it!
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
Jan 27, 2024 20:59:00   #
dwp66
 
JFlorio wrote:
And you believe any charge or slander towards Trump, such as the disproven Russia collusion hoax. Ever hear of innocent until proven guilty? You’re a joke.


Actually, a bi-partisan Congressional Committee led by Republicans found that there was, in fact, Russian interference in the 2016 election.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election

Remember that? There was, in fact, collusion. And even a republican-led panel says so. Get over it.

Second, no, I don't believe "any charge or slander towards Trump" unless I first do a bit of looking to see if it's actually 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆. That's the way I roll: a) Don't unquestionably believe any old thing just because it fits neatly into your personal dogma. b) Check it out first so you don't make a fool of yourself, and c) don't make a statement that you can't back up with the empirical evidence: If it's just your opinion, then say so, but don't confuse it with the facts. That's what I try hard to do, but I am not perfect like DJT, so...

I think a person is innocent until proven guilty. In this case, Trump went before two juries, both dominated by men. He was found guilty and fined. If he had only kept his mouth shut, he would have avoided this last trial and saved himself millions. He just cannot do that.

Reply
Jan 27, 2024 21:09:57   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Of course there was Russian interference. There always is. There was no collusion. The dossier was proven a fake. Like I said, you’re a joke.
dwp66 wrote:
Actually, a bi-partisan Congressional Committee led by Republicans found that there was, in fact, Russian interference in the 2016 election.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election

Remember that? There was, in fact, collusion. And even a republican-led panel says so. Get over it.

Second, no, I don't believe "any charge or slander towards Trump" unless I first do a bit of looking to see if it's actually 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆. That's the way I roll: a) Don't unquestionably believe any old thing just because it fits neatly into your personal dogma. b) Check it out first so you don't make a fool of yourself, and c) don't make a statement that you can't back up with the empirical evidence: If it's just your opinion, then say so, but don't confuse it with the facts. That's what I try hard to do, but I am not perfect like DJT, so...

I think a person is innocent until proven guilty. In this case, Trump went before two juries, both dominated by men. He was found guilty and fined. If he had only kept his mouth shut, he would have avoided this last trial and saved himself millions. He just cannot do that.
Actually, a bi-partisan Congressional Committee le... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 27, 2024 21:13:21   #
American Vet
 
dwp66 wrote:
Actually, a bi-partisan Congressional Committee led by Republicans found that there was, in fact, Russian interference in the 2016 election.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election

Remember that? There was, in fact, collusion. And even a republican-led panel says so. Get over it.

Second, no, I don't believe "any charge or slander towards Trump" unless I first do a bit of looking to see if it's actually 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆. That's the way I roll: a) Don't unquestionably believe any old thing just because it fits neatly into your personal dogma. b) Check it out first so you don't make a fool of yourself, and c) don't make a statement that you can't back up with the empirical evidence: If it's just your opinion, then say so, but don't confuse it with the facts. That's what I try hard to do, but I am not perfect like DJT, so...

I think a person is innocent until proven guilty. In this case, Trump went before two juries, both dominated by men. He was found guilty and fined. If he had only kept his mouth shut, he would have avoided this last trial and saved himself millions. He just cannot do that.
Actually, a bi-partisan Congressional Committee le... (show quote)


From your link:

The report purposely does not come to a final conclusion, as Mueller did and as the House intelligence committee’s 2018 report did, about whether there is sufficient evidence that Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to sway the election to him and away from Clinton, leaving its findings open to partisan interpretation.

Several Republicans on the panel submitted β€œadditional views” to the report, saying it should state more explicitly that Trump’s campaign did not coordinate with Russia. They say that while the report shows the Russian government β€œinappropriately meddled” in the election, β€œthen-candidate Trump was not complicit.”

Get over it

Reply
 
 
Jan 27, 2024 21:48:34   #
dbirch
 
dwp66 wrote:
Eighty Two Million, Three Hundred Thousand Dollars! What a great day for all of us that hate misogynistic bullies!

And, anyone who doubts E. Jean Carroll's account only need look at DJT's π’‘π’“π’†π’—π’Šπ’π’–π’” π’‚π’…π’Žπ’Šπ’•π’•π’†π’… π’ƒπ’†π’‰π’‚π’—π’Šπ’π’“π’”, π’˜π’‰π’Šπ’„π’‰ 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒏 π’—π’Šπ’…π’†π’:

"When you're a star, you can do anything..." Sure you can, Donald. 𝑡𝒐𝒕.

According to the Jury, he did exactly what he said a "star" can do, as well as (at the least) inserting his fingers and possibly more... Can there be any doubt?

Even if he appeals, all he can hope for is a reduction in the award (not likely) to, say, 63 Million or whatever. He will definitely pay, though. He has no choice in the matter. I love this.

What a "great" choice for a GOP Presidential Candidate, don't you think? I simply don't know how you righties just love this turd.

I'm a Dem, but I would take Nicky any day against this immoral narcissist. Any. Day.

Why in heck would anyone want this man in the Oval Office? Is this the best the GOP has to offer?
Eighty Two Million, Three Hundred Thousand Dollars... (show quote)


so you are going to vote for Nikki in the general right?

Reply
Jan 27, 2024 23:38:57   #
Justice101
 
dwp66 wrote:
Eighty Two Million, Three Hundred Thousand Dollars! What a great day for all of us that hate misogynistic bullies!

And, anyone who doubts E. Jean Carroll's account only need look at DJT's π’‘π’“π’†π’—π’Šπ’π’–π’” π’‚π’…π’Žπ’Šπ’•π’•π’†π’… π’ƒπ’†π’‰π’‚π’—π’Šπ’π’“π’”, π’˜π’‰π’Šπ’„π’‰ 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒏 π’—π’Šπ’…π’†π’:

"When you're a star, you can do anything..." Sure you can, Donald. 𝑡𝒐𝒕.

According to the Jury, he did exactly what he said a "star" can do, as well as (at the least) inserting his fingers and possibly more... Can there be any doubt?

Even if he appeals, all he can hope for is a reduction in the award (not likely) to, say, 63 Million or whatever. He will definitely pay, though. He has no choice in the matter. I love this.

What a "great" choice for a GOP Presidential Candidate, don't you think? I simply don't know how you righties just love this turd.

I'm a Dem, but I would take Nicky any day against this immoral narcissist. Any. Day.

Why in heck would anyone want this man in the Oval Office? Is this the best the GOP has to offer?
Eighty Two Million, Three Hundred Thousand Dollars... (show quote)


Trump insulted E. Jean Carroll after she wrote her fantasy book titled "What are Men Good For?" and was discussing her imaginary Trump rape scenario with Anderson Cooper saying that "most people believe that rape is sexy". She must've had a hard time selling her fiction book after Trump said that he didn't know her, she wasn't his type and that she's a total whackjob. The final insult did him in IMO.

Reply
Jan 28, 2024 22:55:33   #
Mikeyavelli
 
JFlorio wrote:
What a biased jury and ridiculous settlement. I don’t believe that whack job woman for a second and I don’t like Trump. Her story makes no sense. No witnesses, no evidence, no confidants, couldn’t remember exactly what happened. He said she said. You agree because you hate Trump and know nothing about the law. Plenty of innocent people been put in prison.


Didn't that E J Carroll just win a lot of money on Name That Dick? She seemed to know a lot.

Reply
Jan 29, 2024 08:21:05   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Didn't that E J Carroll just win a lot of money on Name That Dick? She seemed to know a lot.



Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2024 21:38:02   #
dwp66
 
JFlorio wrote:
Of course there was Russian interference. There always is. There was no collusion. The dossier was proven a fake. Like I said, you’re a joke.


To you, a "joke" is anyone that dares to disagree with you!

Reply
Jan 30, 2024 21:41:43   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
dwp66 wrote:
To you, a "joke" is anyone that dares to disagree with you!


When you spout spin and I counter with facts then, yes you’re a joke. Prove me wrong. I’ll admit it. My dad used to say, β€œIf you’re always right, you’ll never learn anything.”

Reply
Jan 30, 2024 21:42:09   #
dwp66
 
American Vet wrote:
Try reading again what I wrote - the judge stated rape - which is what I said.

And you poor TDS leftist believe anything: No evidence. No witnesses. Not reported to the police. Occurred 30 years ago in a department store changing room. Not reported till now.

But Trump did it!!!

Riiiiiiiiiiiight…..


But she told several people about it at the time it happened. They testified to that fact.

But, I guess all of those 𝒋𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒓𝒔 had "TDS"! Right?

Reply
Jan 30, 2024 21:47:59   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
dwp66 wrote:
But she told several people about it at the time it happened. They testified to that fact.

But, I guess all of those 𝒋𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒓𝒔 had "TDS"! Right?


Prove that with a link. I’ve never been able to find that.
Is Biden guilty?

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/29/847840765/new-information-emerges-around-biden-sexual-assault-allegation

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2024 21:49:15   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
dwp66 wrote:
But she told several people about it at the time it happened. They testified to that fact.

But, I guess all of those 𝒋𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒓𝒔 had "TDS"! Right?


Then why can’t she or the supposed people she told remember the exact day it happened?

Reply
Jan 30, 2024 22:46:39   #
Mikeyavelli
 
JFlorio wrote:
Prove that with a link. I’ve never been able to find that.
Is Biden guilty?

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/29/847840765/new-information-emerges-around-biden-sexual-assault-allegation


Tara Reade won't be a problem for Biden until the House, Senate, and Whitehouse are Republicans.
Until then, it's just Russian disinformation.

Reply
Jan 30, 2024 22:49:45   #
American Vet
 
dwp66 wrote:
But she told several people about it at the time it happened. They testified to that fact.

But, I guess all of those 𝒋𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒓𝒔 had "TDS"! Right?


No evidence. No witnesses. No police report. In a department store. Just her claiming it happened.

Riiiiiiiiiiight.

Reply
Jan 30, 2024 22:58:09   #
Mikeyavelli
 
American Vet wrote:
No evidence. No witnesses. No police report. In a department store. Just her claiming it happened.

Riiiiiiiiiiight.


I remember that I shtupped Marilyn Monroe. Can't remember when, or where, but I know that I did.
And that makes it a fact.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.