One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
No Rush To A Trial
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 5, 2023 07:40:30   #
Liberty Tree
 
Since the crooked D.A. knows he has virtually no case and since the real goal is to stop Trump from running for President he will drag out the start of the trial as long as possible.

Reply
Apr 5, 2023 08:55:51   #
pegw
 
I doubt the DA voted to indite Trump. Remember there were at least 18 to 32 jurors that heard evidence for the counts against him for about 2 months, and then voted. More to come, hopefully soon. I am surprised that the judge didn't put a gag order on Trump's big lying mouth.

Reply
Apr 5, 2023 09:34:29   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Since the crooked D.A. knows he has virtually no case and since the real goal is to stop Trump from running for President he will drag out the start of the trial as long as possible.


This is such a farce. Every charge is the very same thing, altered documents to commit an unknown crime which isn't even revealed. I have read a few indictments and have never seen anything like this one. No ethical judge would have allowed this document to be filed. It's a true joke and I am sure they know it. The entire thing was to give us the indictment of a former president with no hope of conviction, just like the two sham impeachments.

The hypocrisy and corruption of the dems knows no bounds.

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2023 10:01:53   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
pegw wrote:
I doubt the DA voted to indite Trump. Remember there were at least 18 to 32 jurors that heard evidence for the counts against him for about 2 months, and then voted. More to come, hopefully soon. I am surprised that the judge didn't put a gag order on Trump's big lying mouth.


It seems you would eventually grow weary of exposing your lack of acuity. You misspelled "indict' again. Something you obviously don't know about Grand Juries in New York, (just as obviously because you couldn't find the information on Media Bias) is that only 12 jurors have to vote to indict, and only 16 of the 23 have to be present. It's obvious (well, just as obviously not to you) that Bragg sent home as many of the undecided or vote innoncent jurors as possible and kept the rest in session to get the result he wanted.

Reply
Apr 5, 2023 10:04:07   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
This is such a farce. Every charge is the very same thing, altered documents to commit an unknown crime which isn't even revealed. I have read a few indictments and have never seen anything like this one. No ethical judge would have allowed this document to be filed. It's a true joke and I am sure they know it. The entire thing was to give us the indictment of a former president with no hope of conviction, just like the two sham impeachments.

The hypocrisy and corruption of the dems knows no bounds.
This is such a farce. Every charge is the very sa... (show quote)


You will note the presiding judge has a daughter who worked for Happy Endings Harris and he, himself in 2020 donated at least three times to organizations whose stated purpose was "stopping Trump." I'm sorry, did you say something about an "ethical judge?" In New York?

Reply
Apr 5, 2023 10:07:27   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
You will note the presiding judge has a daughter who worked for Happy Endings Harris and he, himself in 2020 donated at least three times to organizations whose stated purpose was "stopping Trump." I'm sorry, did you say something about an "ethical judge?" In New York?


I did say "no ethical judge would have allowed it to be filed," did I not? I wonder who is paying this guy off??

Reply
Apr 5, 2023 11:05:15   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
pegw wrote:
I doubt the DA voted to indite Trump. Remember there were at least 18 to 32 jurors that heard evidence for the counts against him for about 2 months, and then voted. More to come, hopefully soon. I am surprised that the judge didn't put a gag order on Trump's big lying mouth.


And they all contributed to the Biden campaign also. Do a little research, once in a while, or remain dumb, that still isn't a crime yet?

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2023 13:06:17   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Peewee wrote:
And they all contributed to the Biden campaign also. Do a little research, once in a while, or remain dumb, that still isn't a crime yet?



Reply
Apr 6, 2023 13:56:49   #
elledee
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Since the crooked D.A. knows he has virtually no case and since the real goal is to stop Trump from running for President he will drag out the start of the trial as long as possible.


It will drag this on and on to try and generate the most negative political capital he can because he knows in the rule he's got NEXT TO NOTHIN!!!!!!!!

Reply
Apr 6, 2023 14:58:04   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Since the crooked D.A. knows he has virtually no case and since the real goal is to stop Trump from running for President he will drag out the start of the trial as long as possible.


Exactly! What fairvand speedy trial?

Reply
Apr 6, 2023 14:59:04   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
pegw wrote:
I doubt the DA voted to indite Trump. Remember there were at least 18 to 32 jurors that heard evidence for the counts against him for about 2 months, and then voted. More to come, hopefully soon. I am surprised that the judge didn't put a gag order on Trump's big lying mouth.


What about ur big lying mouth? Jurors did not hear evidence, bider did!

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2023 15:18:30   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Since the crooked D.A. knows he has virtually no case and since the real goal is to stop Trump from running for President he will drag out the start of the trial as long as possible.


You need to pull your head out of the hole it is buried in...the DA has an excellent case, similar to what put Cohen behind bars even with a plea deal, it is a very good case.

The decks need to be cleared for the following indictments, which will actually be far more serious.

Reply
Apr 6, 2023 15:19:34   #
woodguru
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
What about ur big lying mouth? Jurors did not hear evidence, bider did!


What are you babbling about Bider did...did what?

Reply
Apr 6, 2023 16:17:17   #
Justice101
 
woodguru wrote:
You need to pull your head out of the hole it is buried in...the DA has an excellent case, similar to what put Cohen behind bars even with a plea deal, it is a very good case.

The decks need to be cleared for the following indictments, which will actually be far more serious.


What put Lying Cohen behind bars was his 5 counts of tax evasion.

Reply
Apr 6, 2023 18:00:42   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
I did say "no ethical judge would have allowed it to be filed," did I not? I wonder who is paying this guy off??


He's a New York Liberal. Hell, he may be doing it for free. The Grand Jury was empaneled in a district that Biden won with 84% of the vote. How hard do you think it was to find 12 assholes who would vote to indict Trump no matter what? Bear in mind, only 16 of the 23 members of the jury have to be there. Bragg sent seven home.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.