Strycker wrote:
Your pseudo-intellectual claptrap makes no sense. Or perhaps my own short comings cause me to fail to understand. What is the point you are trying to make or is your diatribe simply a thinly veiled attack?
When ever any one tells me I make no sense ,this in turn tells me I am converseing over their head.
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Must happen to you a lot since you made no sense, but, if it make you feel superior, by all means, assume away.
vernon wrote:
Anybody with any sense would be against giving the federal government control of elections. The whole idea behind it was to give the govt over to the demorats for ever. Now nyou know how nwe felt about that damn \
John McCane.
I don't know,the government, would contrary to what you probably think of the government , would probably do a very bi - partisan job ,les you for get - the government is administered by the 2/3 party system of Democrats ,Republicans and as of late independents, therefore a system of checks and balances exist.The democrats keep republicans honest and visa verse.... as for handing every thing over to the democrats ;the democrats have losing their inherent advantage since about 1960. It is about 31% democrats ,approximately 29% republicans and about 40 % independents that make up the electorate now.Goverment is government ; personally I prefer the federal as compared to the state goverment,regarding whether the states can adhere to the principles of the entire country as a whole, with each individual states they as of yet proven that they can abide by
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.