Six years of broken promises and delays on the Keystone pipelinee
Sep 22, 2014 22:28:23 #
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/09/19/six-years-of-politics-pandering-and-broken-promises-on-the-keystone-pipeline/
Now if Warren Buffet had been for it do you think that there would have been this much of a delay :?: Money talks, bullshit walks. :hunf: :XD: :XD:
Now if Warren Buffet had been for it do you think that there would have been this much of a delay :?: Money talks, bullshit walks. :hunf: :XD: :XD:
Sep 22, 2014 23:28:40 #
Obama doesn't want to loose that money from Tom Steyer, who has pledged $100 million to defend the Democrats Senate majority in the upcoming midterm elections. There's is the true money!
Elwood wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/09/19/six-years-of-politics-pandering-and-broken-promises-on-the-keystone-pipeline/
Now if Warren Buffet had been for it do you think that there would have been this much of a delay :?: Money talks, bullshit walks. :hunf: :XD: :XD:
Now if Warren Buffet had been for it do you think that there would have been this much of a delay :?: Money talks, bullshit walks. :hunf: :XD: :XD:
Sep 22, 2014 23:30:02 #
bmac32 wrote:
Obama doesn't want to loose that money from Tom Steyer, who has pledged $100 million to defend the Democrats Senate majority in the upcoming midterm elections. There's is the true money!
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Sep 22, 2014 23:54:58 #
I see a very big reason big money should be removed from politics and that's from either side. America is not about money, it's about freedoms.
Elwood wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Sep 22, 2014 23:57:28 #
bmac32 wrote:
I see a very big reason big money should be removed from politics and that's from either side. America is not about money, it's about freedoms.
I agree 100%. :thumbup: :thumbup:
Sep 23, 2014 00:09:22 #
Elwood wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/09/19/six-years-of-politics-pandering-and-broken-promises-on-the-keystone-pipeline/
Now if Warren Buffet had been for it do you think that there would have been this much of a delay :?: Money talks, bullshit walks. :hunf: :XD: :XD:
Now if Warren Buffet had been for it do you think that there would have been this much of a delay :?: Money talks, bullshit walks. :hunf: :XD: :XD:
Read up on America's production of oil under Obama then get back to me. As to the Keystone pipeline, it is the people--Americans--who object to this incursion and laugh at the assurances of safety.
Sep 23, 2014 00:43:31 #
OH really, maybe try reading!
Its a stunning example of Washington putting politics before people. Earlier this year, a Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 65 percent of Americans support building the pipeline, while only 22 percent oppose it. In Washington, three-to-one margins are usually referred to as mandates. With Keystone, however, such numbers are apparently meaningless.
Its a stunning example of Washington putting politics before people. Earlier this year, a Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 65 percent of Americans support building the pipeline, while only 22 percent oppose it. In Washington, three-to-one margins are usually referred to as mandates. With Keystone, however, such numbers are apparently meaningless.
rumitoid wrote:
Read up on America's production of oil under Obama then get back to me. As to the Keystone pipeline, it is the people--Americans--who object to this incursion and laugh at the assurances of safety.
Sep 23, 2014 01:09:08 #
bmac32 wrote:
OH really, maybe try reading!
Its a stunning example of Washington putting politics before people. Earlier this year, a Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 65 percent of Americans support building the pipeline, while only 22 percent oppose it. In Washington, three-to-one margins are usually referred to as mandates. With Keystone, however, such numbers are apparently meaningless.
Its a stunning example of Washington putting politics before people. Earlier this year, a Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 65 percent of Americans support building the pipeline, while only 22 percent oppose it. In Washington, three-to-one margins are usually referred to as mandates. With Keystone, however, such numbers are apparently meaningless.
Lol, 65% that are not in the path of the pipeline of course support it.
Sep 23, 2014 01:11:38 #
rumitoid wrote:
Lol, 65% that are not in the path of the pipeline of course support it.
Broker in the lies of a bought and paid for Right wing flunky, and--tada--a terrible thing is suddenly good for America.
Sep 23, 2014 01:15:49 #
rumitoid wrote:
Read up on America's production of oil under Obama then get back to me. As to the Keystone pipeline, it is the people--Americans--who object to this incursion and laugh at the assurances of safety.
You are truly an ignorant libertard. Quit wasting our time with your bullshit. :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
Sep 23, 2014 03:09:53 #
Elwood wrote:
You are truly an ignorant libertard. Quit wasting our time with your bullshit. :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
Elwood
I second that!
Rumitoid always is against anything constructive. Pipelines are safer than trains.
Snoopy
Sep 23, 2014 04:40:45 #
He's Never Been To The Central Plains
Disrupt A Lot Of Lives:
http://i48.tinypic.com/vqtx6f.gif
Plus They Get Paid For Land Lease
Disrupt A Lot Of Lives:
http://i48.tinypic.com/vqtx6f.gif
Plus They Get Paid For Land Lease
Sep 23, 2014 04:48:27 #
Nobody Minds These:
http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2014-04/192030_5_.jpg
At Least Petroleum Produces Power
And Makes-Up Most Of Everything We Use Daily
http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2014-04/192030_5_.jpg
At Least Petroleum Produces Power
And Makes-Up Most Of Everything We Use Daily
Sep 23, 2014 06:49:25 #
Elwood wrote:
You are truly an ignorant libertard. Quit wasting our time with your bullshit. :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
Couldn't have said it better :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Sep 23, 2014 06:59:33 #
rumitoid wrote:
Read up on America's production of oil under Obama then get back to me. As to the Keystone pipeline, it is the people--Americans--who object to this incursion and laugh at the assurances of safety.
Oil under Obama is in spite of Obama...Obama has done Zip, Nada, zero for the production of oil, it has been private companies on private land moving forward with oil production.
King O the hypocrite is just taking credit for it, to please his not so smart base.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.