I would have given him credit early on for leaving it alone...now when he disrupts the hell out of the way things work he goes back to what it was?

I'll give him credit if he signs the frigging thing, so far his word means less than nothing, because if Hannity beats him up on FOX for caving to Pelosi's demands he will simply refuse to sign it.

I'll give him credit if he signs it, which is what a president is supposed to do. Credit for doing it...no, the house and senate came to a deal there, it's amazing trump was willing to get out of the way, except he really really needs to get something done with his do nothing senate.

[quote from heart of the deal ] “The final key to the way I promote is bravado. I play to people’s fantasies. People may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those who do. That’s why a little hyperbole never hurts. People want to believe that something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular. I call it truthful hyperbole. It’s an innocent form of exaggeration—and a very effective form of promotion.”
He hasn’t given up on this habit. He still claims everything he does is the “biggest” or “best” ever.

If you tune into Trumps tweets and push your way past all the whining and bitching about the articles of impeachment you will find some chest beating about finally implementing the USMCA trade agreement.

Now back in September I did something I doubt any Trump supporter outside of Washington has done. I actually read it.

Then I posted this... NAFTA vs USMCA where I basically revealed the truth about the deal being nothing much more than the same deal Trump was calling a disaster, but with a shiny new label. In general, Trump won a small concession for dairy farmers but he lost the big "intellectual property" fight with Trudeau (who is apparently a better negotiator) and then there is the fixed wages proposed for the automotive industry that doesn't really secure a big win for anyone other than MAYBE the Mexican automotive workers.

The thread didn't even get past page one (LOL), probably because so few people actually care. But what happened in the months since then is that Pelosi refused to ratify the agreement as it was written because what little of the "disaster" Trump was able to renegotiate was so weak. Here's an extract from the Financial Times today...

Democrats successfully pushed for tighter labour standards, strengthened environmental protections and the removal of advantages for pharmaceutical companies in exchange for allowing a vote on USMCA in Congress. Ms Pelosi was able to extract enough concessions from Mr Trump for the deal to be endorsed by the AFL-CIO, the largest trade union federation.

Pelosi said the outcome is “infinitely better” than the original deal reached by Mr Trump.

https://www.ft.com/content/0cb01ba4-1b5e-11ea-9186-7348c2f183af

So, I expect Trump will be beating his chest about this "fabulous deal" that HE made for a while, but for anyone who actually pays attention to the details, USMCA is a story of how Trump's campaign trail attacks on NAFTA led him to an ass-kicking by Trudeau, Pelosi and the AFL-CIO. But hey, they let him keep the name-change, so at least he can pretend it's the amazing renegotiation he promised.

It's worse than you imagine.
I can't remember all of it, but the plan was to take away a bunch of land from Texas land owners.
That was to build the Mexicans a super highway from Mexico to Canada.
Their trucks were not to be stopped.
Basically it was along the already known drug route.
China was to be given a port in Texas and Mexico would be given one in Missouri. It would be called Mexico's land.
I was sent a huge investigative report years ago about it.
Research Robert Pastor.