padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Son, you're an evil man compounded by also being ignorant. I've said it! I accuse you! We don't like you! You're obnoxious beyond reason. I 'm confident you've molested children and animals sometime in your past. That's a sufficient number of accusations. But to be fair, let's take an OPP vote. All who believe Kevyn guilty say, " me too." Under the Progressive fairness doctrine, you're guilty of anything we think.

Kevyn, there is nothing in the constitution giving women a right to murdering her unborn children. Judges like Kavanaugh won't discover those secret type of things "hidden" in the constitution like your progressive activists judges will.

Abortion is used as birth control the super majority of the time. And you sissies always jump in with your lame, "what if she raped by 100 black ghetto thugs all of whom have dozens of communicable diseases?" Roe v. Wade was predicated by a woman who, being coached by her two female lawyers, lied that she'd been gang raped to gain the sympathy of the court. Years later she admitted her boyfriend impregnated her and abandoned her. 60 million dead children based on a lie. Kev, this is precisely your kind of truth and integrity.

maryla

ME TOO

Radiance3

===============
Impartial? No, she was supposed to question the facts. She should have challenged her, interrogated her, to support all her allegations she put up against the innocent Judge.
It must be fact finding. In the Court of Law, facts, evidences, are the ultimate matters the help arriving at the ultimate decision.

The democrats have double standards. Any Republican, or Conservative are required to pass the highest bar, impossible to cross. They squeeze the GOP to the last drop of their blood or juice.
But for the democrats, they allow their juices to stay, grow, until they are bloated and more crimes they commit against the American people. And that becomes their SOP.

Geo

By The New York Times
Sept. 30, 2018

Chad Ludington, a Yale classmate of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s who said he often drank with him, issued a statement on Sunday saying the Supreme Court nominee was not truthful about his drinking in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

Here is the full text of the statement:

I have been contacted by numerous reporters about Brett Kavanaugh and have not wanted to say anything because I had nothing to contribute about what kind of justice he would be. I knew Brett at Yale because I was a classmate and a varsity basketball player and Brett enjoyed socializing with athletes. Indeed, athletes formed the core of Brett’s social circle.

In recent days I have become deeply troubled by what has been a blatant mischaracterization by Brett himself of his drinking at Yale. When I watched Brett and his wife being interviewed on Fox News on Monday, and when I watched Brett deliver his testimony under oath to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, I cringed. For the fact is, at Yale, and I can speak to no other times, Brett was a frequent drinker, and a heavy drinker. I know, because, especially in our first two years of college, I often drank with him. On many occasions I heard Brett slur his words and saw him staggering from alcohol consumption, not all of which was beer. When Brett got drunk, he was often belligerent and aggressive. On one of the last occasions I purposely socialized with Brett, I witnessed him respond to a semi-hostile remark, not by defusing the situation, but by throwing his beer in the man’s face and starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail.

I do not believe that the heavy drinking or even loutish behavior of an 18- or even 21-year-old should condemn a person for the rest of his life. I would be a hypocrite to think so. However, I have direct and repeated knowledge about his drinking and his disposition while drunk. And I do believe that Brett’s actions as a 53-year-old federal judge matter. If he lied about his past actions on national television, and more especially while speaking under oath in front of the United States Senate, I believe those lies should have consequences. It is truth that is at stake, and I believe that the ability to speak the truth, even when it does not reflect well upon oneself, is a paramount quality we seek in our nation’s most powerful judges.

ADVERTISEMENT


I can unequivocally say that in denying the possibility that he ever blacked out from drinking, and in downplaying the degree and frequency of his drinking, Brett has not told the truth.

I felt it was my civic duty to tell of my experience while drinking with Brett, and I offer this statement to the press. I have no desire to speak further publicly, and nothing more to say to the press at this time. I will, however, take my information to the F.B.I.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Actually. Mitchell did an excellent job under the circumstances. She even commented toward the end of her questioning that conducting a witness interrogation in five minute intervals, alternating with five minutes of comments by the senators was not the prescribed method of questioning a witness. Mitchell said that a one on one meeting, just the two of them is the proper method. It would make them both more comfortable and remove the stress of being under public scrutiny.

I just watched for the third time prosecutor Rachel Mitchell's questioning of Blasey Ford in its entirety. I paid close attention to Ford's responses to the questions.

Blasey Ford is accusing Kavanaugh of an assault that occurred 36 years ago. Initially, Mitchell focused on events of the alleged assault and Ford began many of her responses to these questions with, "I don't recall exactly . . . . .", "I can't remember if . . . . ", "I'm not sure about . . . . ." "I'll have to get back to you . . . . "

Later on Mitchell focused on events as recent as July this year, asking Ford questions about her communication with Feinstein, her attorneys, and the Washington Post, referring to specific details about those contacts. Again, Ford responded with, "I don't remember exactly . . . .", "I don't recall if . . . ." "I'm not sure about . . . . ", " I don't know for sure . . . "

I also watched a video of the same questioning as an expert on body language analyzed Ford's mannerisms, facial expressions, eye, hand and body movements, voice inflections, breath control, and other elements of physical responses. The most striking thing was Ford's almost instant transformations from a timid, frightened 14 year old girl into a stoic, defiant woman. The body language expert said this behavior is indicative of a person with much to hide acting out a role.

And, I watched Blasey Ford's opening statement. I saw the 14 year old girl, near tears, choking and whimpering and talking with teenage "up-speak inflections. It was pathetic, not to mention unbelievable.

I'll give Rachel Mitchell a for her interrogation of Ford under difficult circumstances.

Radiance3

=================
Was the merit taken into consideration if it helped the judge on that Mitchell interview? Everything Blasey-Ford said was "I can't remember", even the very recent one. How could she being drunk, remember that the judge assaulted her if not a "made up" lie? Paid for by the democrats.

And then the Judge until now is continuously given a 3rd degree FBI investigation when he was investigated 6 times prior, with no negative evidence found.

The only problems at the Senate to finalize a confirmation are: Blakely, Collins, and Murkowski. What is the matter with this two GOP women? They could allow prolonging the pains and sufferings of the Judge and his family. Though they have no feelings at all. The Judge is innocent. He could have been confirmed already if not for those two women. He and his family are suffering. I cried with them. I could feel their pain.

maryla

I remember when Kavanaugh had finished the intensive questioning by the Dems, didn't he say abortion was settled law...

bahmer

After the democrats have attacked him like this his opinion may have just changed if given a chance to do so concerning Roe v Wade.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

I suspect there are many laws that are called "settled laws" but really aren't.

Radiance3

===============
Blade after the release of the prosecutor's report, she did a very professional assessment of the accuser. It was accurate, honest, and had provided the accurate picture of Blasey-Ford. She was at all time high lying, inconsistent, appeared so dumb answering the questions. How was she called a professor? Very insulting to have a professor like that. Psychology is a doctor of lunatic people.

I