Time to get an AG who will indict these criminals Las enforcement is so eager to pull the trigger against people like Martha Stewart, but when it comes to the Leftist cabal, Obama and crew, they short on the draw. How many have these yahoos been holding back on 'docs' that are nothing short of "incriminating"? And if they weren't, these docs would be handed over (or redacted) immediately. Gowdy was back on track today on Fox Sunday. Good interview by Wallace. (had given up on Gowdy for awhile, but he seemed to be back on track and straight forward.) Interested in following "the rule of law", something you guys on the Left wouldn't know anything about.

This is a link to a nice middle of the road site... read all of it to get to context..

ttps://www.wired.com/story/did-russia-affect-the-2016-election-its-now-undeniable/

1. What was the scope of the Russian effort?

The Mueller indictment permanently demolishes the idea that the scale of the Russian campaign was not significant enough to have any impact on the American public. We are no longer talking about approximately $100,000 (paid in rubles, no less) of advertising grudgingly disclosed by Facebook, but tens of millions of dollars spent over several years to build a broad, sophisticated system that can influence American opinion.

2. What kind of content did it rely on?

As the indictment lays out in thorough detail, the content pumped out by the Russians was not paid or promoted ads; it was so-called native content—including video, visual, memetic, and text elements designed to push narrative themes, conspiracies, and character attacks. All of it was designed to look like it was coming from authentic American voices and interest groups. And the IRA wasn’t just guessing about what worked. They used data-driven targeting and analysis to assess how the content was received, and they used that information to refine their messages and make them more effective.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This corrosive effect is real and significant. Which part of the fear of “sharia law in America” came from Russian accounts versus readers of InfoWars? How much did the Russian campaigns targeting black voters impact the low turnout, versus the character attacks run against Clinton by the Trump campaign itself? For now, all we can know is that there is shared narrative, and shared responsibility. But if, as the indictment says, Russian information warriors were instructed to support “Sanders and Trump,” and those two campaigns appeared to have the most aggressive and effective online outreach, what piece of that is us, and what is them?

I would love to hear them too. But somehow I bet IF they are allowed to come forward and still protect themselves as witnesses, their testimony will be behind closed doors. Transparency isn't something the government seems to be remotely interested in. Everyday it seems more and more corruption and abuse of power is exposed. And then instead of accountability the perpetrators' outrageous actions are soft-peddled and/or excused. What is obvious for the most part is that those bureaucrats in Washington D.C. have utter contempt for the American people and think everyone is too stupid to see what's right in front of them.

The battle is with spiritual wickedness in "high "places. The protected Deep State/shadow government apparatchiks/bought bureaucrats.
Sooo help expose them!!!
Wake up others as to their agenda which has gone on for decades:

To understand that agenda; Google: “CFR, TC, Bilderberg Group”

*Council on Foreign Relations CFR & Trilateral Commission TC Background & Quotes*

“An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal attack" – Richard Gardner ,
Ambassador to Italy - quoted in (CFR)Foreign Affairs, April, 1974
“Actions at the multinational level will be needed, if the process of international relocation of industries is to be accelerated in an organized fashion…….” TC Report #23, 1982