There is nothing to pick apart. It is true and involves the same kind of thinkng when it comes to supporting Trunp. Mounting evidence of coruption. ans conspiracy with Putin and the Russian has no effect on Trumps support and seems to even strengthen it. Because his supporters blife in the fantasy that her really is their savior,so all the mounting evidecnce is fake because the savior says so. In affect Trump is has own judge and thats OK because thats the way they like. Love of faith fallsin that same bracket its a feel good thing, it is comforting and that the way they like it

There is nothing to pick apart. It is true and involves the same kind of thinkng when it comes to supporting Trunp. Mounting evidence of coruption. ans conspiracy with Putin and the Russian has no effect on Trumps support and seems to even strengthen it. Because his supporters blife in the fantasy that her really is their savior,so all the mounting evidecnce is fake because the savior says so. In affect Trump is has own judge and thats OK because thats the way they like. Love of faith fallsin that same bracket its a feel good thing, it is comforting and that the way they like it

Nothing. There is no connection between that theory and Trump I'm speaking of the way the minds of conservatives works. I discovered ---oh is been 47 years now how it works . The conservative mind does not want to hear facts, evidence, or logic. They want to believe --even in the absence of all evidence. The belief is what matters above all, and they cling to their beliefs. shielding their eyes and ears from anything that might allow shadow of doubt to enter and threaten their belief. It is the same mentality that Trump Supporters cling to. Trump is a pathological liar but his supporters cannot see it to them Trump is a straight shooter out to save the world or something. But to progressive liberals he is the most corrupt, immoral, vindictive, money grubbing, narcissistic, egomaniacal, erratic, self centered scum bag, to ever grace the halls of the White house. Based on the facts and evidence of his history as well as his presence and behavior

I have no beef with Shepardim

Modern Jews are essentially divided into two major categories, ethnically and culturally: Sephardim and Ashkenazim.
The former are primarily of Spanish origin; the name Sephardim being derived from Sepharad, the Hebrew word for Spain, and are likely the closest to actual Semitic Jews that can be established. They were expelled from Spain toward the beginning of the sixteenth century and immigrated to the eastern Mediterranean and Balkans.
As late as 1960s the Sephardic Jews numbered only about 500,000, compared with the Ashkenazim of the same period estimated at approximately twelve million. 61
In defining the origins of the Ashkenazim, Alan Brook states that "The geographic location of the Ashkenaz, based on references in the Torah, may be centered around southern Russia, Armenia, and Asia Minor. The ashkaenoi (askae or askai) were the people also known as Phrygians or Mysians (Meshech)." Some historians claim that the name Ashkenaz applies exclusively to German Jews. However, more recent evidence shows that they had immigrated from the southern regions of Russia and western Asia and Asia Minor -- that region clearly identified as the location and origin of the ancient Khazars. The name originally indicated Iranians and was later given as the name of the god of Meshech, Men Askaenos. "It should also be pointed out," Brook adds, "that Ashkenaz did not become a definite Jewish designation for Germany until the eleventh century." 62
"According to the explanation by the Talmud," writes Hugo Freiherr, "Ashkenaz thus means a country near the Black Sea between Ararat and the Caucasus, within the original region of the Khazar empire." 63 This, again, is precisely the geographic locality of the Khazarian empire. The Talmudic observation is abetted by Scripture which names Ashkenaz as descending not from Shem but from Japheth through Gomer, and whose uncles were Magog and Tubal. (See Gen. 10:3)
Ashkenaz (alt. spelling: Ashchenaz) is mentioned in but one scripture other than 1 Chronicles 6:1, which is only another reference to the genealogy as descending from Japheth. In the book of Jeremiah the prophet, God announces that Israel is to call upon other nations as allies in bringing His judgments against Babylon. Among those allies, who are not part of Israel or Judah, and therefore could not be numbered as Jews, is Ashchenaz. (See Jer. 51:27)
UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, published a series of booklets entitled, The Race Question in Modern Science, in which oneof the authors, Harry Shapiro, states:
The wide range of variation between Jewish populations in their physical characteristics and the diversity of the gene frequencies of their blood groups render any unified racial classification for them a contradiction in terms. For although modern racial theory admits some degree of polymorphism or variation within a racial group, it does not permit distinctly different groups, measured by its own criteria of race, to be identified as one. To do so would make the biological purposes of racial classification futile and the whole procedure arbitrary and meaningless. ...despite the evidence efforts continue to be made to somehow segregate the Jews as a distinct racial entity. 64
Thus, attempting to claim the existence of a "race" of Jews has been proven to be an anthropological impossibility. Though their God consistently warned them against intermingling themselves amongst non-Jewish races, their miscegenistic tendencies are well documented, and has resulted in their complete erasure as a distinct, genetic peoples.
When, inevitably, there was mixing of Western European and Khazarian Jews, there was a notable difference between the educational levels of the two Jewish sub-cultures. The Khazars greatly admired their vastly less numerous but far more learned Western (German speaking) brethren and quickly adopted their language, education and cultural practices. This resulted, also, in an assimilation of their other talents in the area of economics, business and things politik.
"The Khazars were not descended from the Tribes," says Koestler, "but, as we have seen, they shared a certain cosmopolitanism and other social characteristics with their co-religionists." 65
Somewhere in the historical roots of the Ashkenazi Khazars there incubated a desire to possess a national Jewish homeland. That desire expressed itself in the form of a Messianic movement in twelfth century Khazaria that took on the texture of a "Jewish crusade" whose goal was the forcible subjugation of Palestine. A Khazar Jew named Solomon ben Duji instigated the movement and began an international correspondence with all the Jews of surrounding nations.
It seems that ben Duji was possessed of messianic delusions of his own in that he claimed that "the time had come in which God would gather Israel, His people from all lands to Jerusalem, the holy city, and that Solomon Ben Duji was Elijah, and his son the Messiah." 66
This desire for a Jewish homeland echoed down the centuries and found expression again. "It was among Ashkenazi Jews," says the Encyclopedia Americana, "that the idea of political Zionism emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel....In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million, about 84 percent of the world Jewish population." 67
At times Arthur Koestler, in his broad and extensive treatment of this subject, appears, as a Jew himself, to wrestle with the glaring contradiction that the Jews, who have no genetic or true ethnic identity, are entitled to land they have never, by any right of descent, owned or possessed, and whose ancestors have never occupied. Then, claiming to be the state of Israel, created by United Nations fiat, they arbitrarily removed that land from the possession of those who have legitimately owned and occupied it for thousands of years. Mr. Koestler claims that such right "is not based on the hypothetical origins of the Jewish people, nor on the mythological covenant of Abraham with God; it is based on international law -- i.e., on the United Nations' decision in 1947 to partition Palestine...[actually declared, May 14, 1948.]" 68

Siding with ISIS to take down Assad's elected, Christian protecting government, is NOT the answer.
The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
https://youtu.be/dkamZg68jpk
Anyone interested in the history of "False Flag" events in US History is well advised to visit here:
http://www.wanttoknow.info/falseflag
Why in the Hell would have Assad gassed his own people?
Assad would have to be an idiot. NO motive!!!
It gave the US/CFR foreign policy an excuse to support ISIS and other foreign mercenaries. Those trying to take over Syria.
We can't afford another SNAFU Like the US created in Libya. That move funded and armed ISIS, AND allowed ISIS to go unmolested to Syria.
More Americans better figure this out. Pay attention to covert US foreign policy and share?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI&feature=player_detailpage
Turning a blind eye to the False Flag in 2013; has invited more of the same.
The Road to World War 3
https://youtu.be/HP7L8bw5QF4