One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Can you identify the Russian trolls on here?
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
Apr 18, 2018 22:13:37   #
debeda
 
son of witless wrote:
I want to stick to energy policy under President Carter. My posts are becoming far too long . Carter inherited declining American Oil production and increasing prices for imported oil. Okay what should he have done about it and what did he do about it ? He should have done everything possible to increase domestic oil production. Did he do that ? Somewhat, maybe, perhaps. He proposed letting the price of oil go up to market prices. Good because that would encourage oil companies to explore and increase production. Very good, except then he put a windfall profits tax on the oil companies, which as everyone knows they are evil and do not deserve all of that money.

So on the one hand he lets oil go to market prices yet he takes away the extra money going to oil companies. Meanwhile foreign oil companies are free to make all of the money they want. So okay what are the results ? Gasoline and heating oil and diesel fuel for trucks go up. These added costs dampen the economy right when people needed to make more money. The extra money from these increased cost doesn't go to the oil companies because of Carter's idiot wind fall profits tax. So what ? Well American oil production actually goes down.

What else is Mr. Peanut doing not to fix the problem. Well he makes a big speech about Solar energy. Stupid. First of all the technology is not that good. Second of all the real energy shortage is in transportation, which is oil. Even if Solar was fantastic, which it ain't going to mean anything for cars and trucks, which is most of the problem. It might make a microscopic difference for those heating their homes with heating oil.

Anyway the story has a happy ending. Ronnie Raygun road into town. He lowered taxes, encouraged more domestic oil production. Then the price of oil dropped. Then in 1989 Ronaldus Magnus road off into the Sunset. I wanted to thank that masked man.
I want to stick to energy policy under President C... (show quote)


Love the last paragraph Son

Reply
Apr 19, 2018 03:32:27   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
In our debate, you put the audience on their phones.

I don't know what that means.

Mikeyavelli wrote:

Trump, by the way, is winning the wars.
Ask Kid Kim, or Xi the China Guy. Or, Vladimir Putin.

Seriously? You think Putin would sit there, look me in the eye and say, "Daa, Trump is kicking my ass". LOL.

...And what are these "wars" you're yammering about? Trade wars? Like I already said, we have yet to see any Trump trade deals actually implemented. His impact on trade has been limited to federal mandates like tarifs. Military wars? LOL... Trump can't even stick to a plan when his Secretary of State is carrying out a mission. He's more a liability than a commander. There's a good chance his recklessness will get good Americans killed for no good reason, but I'm sure if that happen's he'll be sure to ask the networks to thank him for boosting their ratings.

Reply
Apr 19, 2018 04:59:58   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
son of witless wrote:
straightUp wrote: " Your role? What exactly *IS* your role, that you have to train for? Or are you just bullshitting? "

To educate Permafrost. It sounds as if I can help you also.

I see... so, it takes a lot of training to educate Permafrost, eh?

son of witless wrote:

straightUp wrote: "So right after telling permafrost that he's missing the fundamental problem because he isn't trained to look for deeper reasons like you are... you state the obvious and dive no deeper. (You're so convincing). "
It is only obvious now that I have stated it.

No, it's been obvious since the 80's.

son of witless wrote:

I have dived deeper than anyone else so far. ( I am glad you are convinced ).


Yeah, I bet you have... just how deep do cesspools go anyway? ;)

son of witless wrote:
straightUp wrote:
" First of all, I think you're wrong... America was still "able" to produce 100% of it's own oil in the 70's. It just wasn't as profitable for the oil companies to do so. Technically, an oil peak is the point where the oil that's left in the ground can no longer be extracted at a cost low enough to profit and that's what happened during the Nixon era... we hit our oil peak and so the oil companies decided to invest in overseas operations where high grade oil is cheaper to extract, or in some cases like Enron the game was to simply buy cheap foreign oil and sell in on the American market for an easy profit. "


Me wrong ? That is not possible. American oil companies are for profit enterprises. When something is not profitable in a large way, then it is not possible to be done. All corporations must raise capital. If you do not make a profit on that capital you go out of business. What part of that statement do you not understand ? ? ? ? ?
straightUp wrote: i br " First of all, I th... (show quote)

What makes you think I don't understand any of it? You're just saying the same thing I already said. Witless... we KNOW how capitalism works... the reason I said you were wrong is that America was WAS able to produce it's own oil... you said otherwise and that's where I think you were wrong. Just because domestic oil is a less attractive investment in a free global market doesn't mean it can't happen. If domestic oil was nationalized, it probably would have happened.

son of witless wrote:
Only when Reagan let Oil companies make all the money they wanted, did oil production go up and the price come down. A FREAKIN AMAZING how that worked.

The price didn't go down, they went up. Maybe you don't understand how price control works... in a nutshell, centralized price controls keep prices lower than market value. BTW, these price controls didn't originate with Carter, they originated with Nixon. So give credit where it's due ;) - in any case, when Reagan deregulated, the prices were allowed to go UP and THAT attracts investment into more production. So yeah, pretty amazing. But the direct result of deregulation was that the prices went up, not down.

Prices did eventually go down, but that was sometime afterward and although the increase in domestic output did factor in, much of that drop was a result of Carter's long term strategies, like investing in research that resulted in increased MPG ratings for cars during the Reagan era.

son of witless wrote:
straightUp wrote:
"
That's it? All your training in looking for deeper causes and all you can come up with is that Carter tried to manage demand... and THAT caused stagflation? "


YES YES YES ! ! ! ! Just cutting demand would not cause stagflation. It was Carter's methods of cutting demand that did it. Carter had a way of ordering things to be done without considering the peripheral damage he was doing. Whatever methods a President employs he must be aware of side effects. Carter seemed to have no comprehensive vision for blending the results of his various policies. Okay allowing prices to rise to discourage consumption. Fine, but poor working classes bore the brunt of that pain. That caused those people to cut back their spending in other areas. They could not just trade in their gas hog for a brand new high mileage car.
straightUp wrote: i br " br That's it? All... (show quote)

Yeah, being confused about who allowed the price to rise is really screwing up your position on this. So, when you realize it was Reagan, not Carter that allowed the price to soar will you totally change the bit about the poor working class bearing the brunt of the pain? 'Cause ya know... that wouldn't make the GOP look so good.

son of witless wrote:

straightUp wrote: " What Jimmy Carter was "managing" was the encouragement of anything that could reduce our dependency on oil, such as funding research for alternative energy. "

Jimmy Carter was an idiot. The drop in oil prices in the 80s and 90s proved Carter was wrong. It is now 40 years later and alternative energy is still dependent on welfare to survive.


No, the drop in oil prices proved he was right as they were directly related to his conservation policies. You're trying to give credit to a play on domestic regulation on price control. That means the change is limited to the variance between the previously controlled price and the global market value... It's a narrow margin compared to the decreased demand over several years via improvements in energy efficiency and conservation.

son of witless wrote:
It was not Carter's job to manage the next 40 years. it was Carter's job to manage the late 70s and he failed miserably.

No, it was his job to manage the next 40 years. It's the job of every president to safeguard the future for our children. I'm actually flabbergasted that you would even make such a shallow, idiotic statement. In fact, if Reagan didn't make it a mission to fart on every one of Cartgy polices we would much further long in alternate energy today. We would be leading the world in clean energy, not trailing it. We may have even avoided idiot wars like Iraq and Afghanistan.

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2018 08:47:03   #
Mikeyavelli
 
straightUp wrote:
Seriously? You think Putin would sit there, look me in the eye and say, "Daa, Trump is kicking my ass". LOL.

...And what are these "wars" you're yammering about? Trade wars? Like I already said, we have yet to see any Trump trade deals actually implemented. His impact on trade has been limited to federal mandates like tarifs. Military wars? LOL... Trump can't even stick to a plan when his Secretary of State is carrying out a mission. He's more a liability than a commander. There's a good chance his recklessness will get good Americans killed for no good reason, but I'm sure if that happen's he'll be sure to ask the networks to thank him for boosting their ratings.
Seriously? You think Putin would sit there, look m... (show quote)


I'll furnish the part about the audience on their phones.
Yer boring.

Reply
Apr 19, 2018 08:53:00   #
son of witless
 
straightUp wrote:
No, it was his job to manage the next 40 years. It's the job of every president to safeguard the future for our children. I'm actually flabbergasted that you would even make such a shallow, idiotic statement. In fact, if Reagan didn't make it a mission to fart on every one of Cartgy polices we would much further long in alternate energy today. We would be leading the world in clean energy, not trailing it. We may have even avoided idiot wars like Iraq and Afghanistan.


" I see... so, it takes a lot of training to educate Permafrost, eh? "

You have no idea.

" No, it's been obvious since the 80's. "

Not obvious to you guys, if your posts are any guide.


" I have dived deeper than anyone else so far. ( I am glad you are convinced ).


Yeah, I bet you have... just how deep do cesspools go anyway? ;) "

I am just like Joe Friday. I deal in facts not crap.

" What makes you think I don't understand any of it? You're just saying the same thing I already said. Witless... we KNOW how capitalism works... the reason I said you were wrong is that America was WAS able to produce it's own oil... you said otherwise and that's where I think you were wrong. Just because domestic oil is a less attractive investment in a free global market doesn't mean it can't happen. If domestic oil was nationalized, it probably would have happened. "

You said we could produce 100 % of our own oil when that obviously was false. Potential is not fact. Production all over the world finally caught up with demand in the late 80s. Like saying if oil was nationalized. Do you mean like in Venezuela ?

" Prices did eventually go down, but that was sometime afterward and although the increase in domestic output did factor in, much of that drop was a result of Carter's long term strategies, like investing in research that resulted in increased MPG ratings for cars during the Reagan era. "

Oil got so cheap that beginning in the late 80s there was a decade where oil companies had to lay off drilling crews. That had very little to do with Carter. It was all supply supply supple.

" No, it was his job to manage the next 40 years. It's the job of every president to safeguard the future for our children. I'm actually flabbergasted that you would even make such a shallow, idiotic statement. "

If you think you can tell me how the next 40 years will go, I will tell you that you are full of Obama. Carter needed to get America through the late 70s intact. He pretty much failed. If we fail to get through the next 5 years, 40 years from now is irrelevant.

Reply
Apr 19, 2018 09:07:42   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
son of witless wrote:
" I see... so, it takes a lot of training to educate Permafrost, eh? "

You have no idea.

" No, it's been obvious since the 80's. "

Not obvious to you guys, if your posts are any guide.


" I have dived deeper than anyone else so far. ( I am glad you are convinced ).


Yeah, I bet you have... just how deep do cesspools go anyway? ;) "

I am just like Joe Friday. I deal in facts not crap.

" What makes you think I don't understand any of it? You're just saying the same thing I already said. Witless... we KNOW how capitalism works... the reason I said you were wrong is that America was WAS able to produce it's own oil... you said otherwise and that's where I think you were wrong. Just because domestic oil is a less attractive investment in a free global market doesn't mean it can't happen. If domestic oil was nationalized, it probably would have happened. "

You said we could produce 100 % of our own oil when that obviously was false. Potential is not fact. Production all over the world finally caught up with demand in the late 80s. Like saying if oil was nationalized. Do you mean like in Venezuela ?

" Prices did eventually go down, but that was sometime afterward and although the increase in domestic output did factor in, much of that drop was a result of Carter's long term strategies, like investing in research that resulted in increased MPG ratings for cars during the Reagan era. "

Oil got so cheap that beginning in the late 80s there was a decade where oil companies had to lay off drilling crews. That had very little to do with Carter. It was all supply supply supple.

" No, it was his job to manage the next 40 years. It's the job of every president to safeguard the future for our children. I'm actually flabbergasted that you would even make such a shallow, idiotic statement. "

If you think you can tell me how the next 40 years will go, I will tell you that you are full of Obama. Carter needed to get America through the late 70s intact. He pretty much failed. If we fail to get through the next 5 years, 40 years from now is irrelevant.
" I see... so, it takes a lot of training to ... (show quote)



Son,

Gosh, sorry I was gone all day yesterday, those half hour errands can extend all day.. but Streaght up, did a better job of clearing this up then I could have.. great reply by him.. as always..



Seems your "facts" belong in the talks that come from the white house.. All BS..

https://www.ft.com/content/7da16504-06af-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

Shale powers US oil output to heights of 1970
Surge to flows of 10m b/d a day means shake-up for global crude market



Ed Crooks in New York JANUARY 31, 2018



More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/7da16504-06af-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

US oil production has returned to its record high point, 47 years after the previous peak during the final days of the last Texas oil boom, as the shale revolution that was temporarily set back by low crude prices has reignited.

The government’s Energy Information Administration estimated on Wednesday that US output was running at just under 10.04m barrels per day last November, fractionally below the previous record set in November 1970.



Reply
Apr 19, 2018 13:58:51   #
ghostgotcha Loc: The Florida swamps
 
straightUp wrote:
Why don't you debate my points instead of hiding you're ineptitude behind your childish insults?


Alas, "straightup." Why in the world would I waste my time trying to have an in-depth and meaningful debate with a arrogant buffoon like you?

Consider:
Arrogant people like you, tend to see themselves not just as able, but as perfect. They think they are superior to everyone else, everybody should like them, and they deserve special treatment, all the time. It’s an exaggerated mindset, which leads to exaggerated social behavior.

Behind this self-image of perfection, deep down, arrogant people are often quite insecure. Many lack self-esteem or have an inferiority complex. So acting as if they’re perfect and deserve special treatment is just an attempt to get attention and social validation, in order to compensate for their feelings of inadequacy.

We see and read the words of like-minded twits here - everyday.

Therefore:

I would suggest you unplug your keyboard this very moment. That way; anyone yet to read your arrogant diatribes, will be denied the opportunity to laugh aloud at you.



Poor thing.

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2018 14:02:14   #
bahmer
 
ghostgotcha wrote:
Alas, "straightup." Why in the world would I waste my time trying to have an in-depth and meaningful debate with a arrogant buffoon like you?

Consider:
Arrogant people like you, tend to see themselves not just as able, but as perfect. They think they are superior to everyone else, everybody should like them, and they deserve special treatment, all the time. It’s an exaggerated mindset, which leads to exaggerated social behavior.

Behind this self-image of perfection, deep down, arrogant people are often quite insecure. Many lack self-esteem or have an inferiority complex. So acting as if they’re perfect and deserve special treatment is just an attempt to get attention and social validation, in order to compensate for their feelings of inadequacy.

We see and read the words of like-minded twits here - everyday.

Therefore:

I would suggest you unplug your keyboard this very moment. That way; anyone yet to read your arrogant diatribes, will be denied the opportunity to laugh aloud at you.



Poor thing.
Alas, "straightup." Why in the world w... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Apr 19, 2018 16:07:19   #
son of witless
 
permafrost wrote:
Son,

Gosh, sorry I was gone all day yesterday, those half hour errands can extend all day.. but Streaght up, did a better job of clearing this up then I could have.. great reply by him.. as always..



Seems your "facts" belong in the talks that come from the white house.. All BS..

https://www.ft.com/content/7da16504-06af-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

Shale powers US oil output to heights of 1970
Surge to flows of 10m b/d a day means shake-up for global crude market



Ed Crooks in New York JANUARY 31, 2018



More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/7da16504-06af-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

US oil production has returned to its record high point, 47 years after the previous peak during the final days of the last Texas oil boom, as the shale revolution that was temporarily set back by low crude prices has reignited.

The government’s Energy Information Administration estimated on Wednesday that US output was running at just under 10.04m barrels per day last November, fractionally below the previous record set in November 1970.
Son, br br Gosh, sorry I was gone all day yesterd... (show quote)


" Gosh, sorry I was gone all day yesterday, those half hour errands can extend all day.. but Streaght up, did a better job of clearing this up then I could have.. great reply by him.. as always.."

Yea, he did okay. He wasn't as good as me, but considering he had to defend your position, he did just fine.

" https://www.ft.com/content/7da16504-06af-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

Shale powers US oil output to heights of 1970
Surge to flows of 10m b/d a day means shake-up for global crude market "

Your link wanted me to sign up for a subscription before I could read the content, which I declined.

Shale did not become a major factor until the late 90s/early 2000s. As much as I am pro shale/pro fracking, it cannot be used to explain the late 80s oil glut. Conventional and offshore drilling in the 80s all over the world is the cause. And that my friend was due to good old fashioned capitalism. Allowing the money to flow to the evil oil companies allowed them to use that capital to increase supplies. Unfortunately oil booms and busts tend to take decades to play out. By the late 90s the oil glut was gone and it took years to once again ramp up production, including fracking shale.

Reply
Apr 19, 2018 20:56:58   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
straightUp wrote:
No, it was his job to manage the next 40 years. It's the job of every president to safeguard the future for our children. I'm actually flabbergasted that you would even make such a shallow, idiotic statement. In fact, if Reagan didn't make it a mission to fart on every one of Cartgy polices we would much further long in alternate energy today. We would be leading the world in clean energy, not trailing it. We may have even avoided idiot wars like Iraq and Afghanistan.

Wow...you do go on and on and on and on and on and on...........

Reply
Apr 19, 2018 21:09:52   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
permafrost wrote:
Son,

Gosh, sorry I was gone all day yesterday, those half hour errands can extend all day.. but Streaght up, did a better job of clearing this up then I could have.. great reply by him.. as always..



Seems your "facts" belong in the talks that come from the white house.. All BS..

https://www.ft.com/content/7da16504-06af-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

Shale powers US oil output to heights of 1970
Surge to flows of 10m b/d a day means shake-up for global crude market



Ed Crooks in New York JANUARY 31, 2018



More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/7da16504-06af-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

US oil production has returned to its record high point, 47 years after the previous peak during the final days of the last Texas oil boom, as the shale revolution that was temporarily set back by low crude prices has reignited.

The government’s Energy Information Administration estimated on Wednesday that US output was running at just under 10.04m barrels per day last November, fractionally below the previous record set in November 1970.
Son, br br Gosh, sorry I was gone all day yesterd... (show quote)


Perm..how can you put something like that on here?. Benghazi was about our men getting attacked and killed and no back up in sight because the drunken SOS was probably drunk and passed out. Even if she wasn't, she could of cared less Same with the pos Obama.Remember....."what difference does it make now"? Tell that to the wives and children that lost their husbands and the children that lost their fathers? Show me the damn collusion between Trump and the Russians and I'll shut my mouth..There is no way you can compare this dog and pony show to Benghazi.

Reply
 
 
Apr 19, 2018 21:11:40   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
ghostgotcha wrote:
Alas, "straightup." Why in the world would I waste my time trying to have an in-depth and meaningful debate with a arrogant buffoon like you?

Consider:
Arrogant people like you, tend to see themselves not just as able, but as perfect. They think they are superior to everyone else, everybody should like them, and they deserve special treatment, all the time. It’s an exaggerated mindset, which leads to exaggerated social behavior.

Behind this self-image of perfection, deep down, arrogant people are often quite insecure. Many lack self-esteem or have an inferiority complex. So acting as if they’re perfect and deserve special treatment is just an attempt to get attention and social validation, in order to compensate for their feelings of inadequacy.

We see and read the words of like-minded twits here - everyday.

Therefore:

I would suggest you unplug your keyboard this very moment. That way; anyone yet to read your arrogant diatribes, will be denied the opportunity to laugh aloud at you.



Poor thing.
Alas, "straightup." Why in the world w... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 19, 2018 22:37:35   #
ghostgotcha Loc: The Florida swamps
 
And then Ex, President Carter was remembered fondly:



Reply
Apr 20, 2018 08:52:30   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
kankune wrote:
Perm..how can you put something like that on here?. Benghazi was about our men getting attacked and killed and no back up in sight because the drunken SOS was probably drunk and passed out. Even if she wasn't, she could of cared less Same with the pos Obama.Remember....."what difference does it make now"? Tell that to the wives and children that lost their husbands and the children that lost their fathers? Show me the damn collusion between Trump and the Russians and I'll shut my mouth..There is no way you can compare this dog and pony show to Benghazi.
Perm..how can you put something like that on here?... (show quote)




Kan,


Benghazi was a cluster****, but not a plot.. the investigations found nothing was done wrong. Tragic, yes.. so were the other incidents over the years..

"what difference does it make" This comment is presented out of context, it was not about the dead Americans, it was about the reason for the riot/attack.

A video? What a dumb thing to say.. Organized? probably.. But not about the deaths..


trump?... noose tightened another notch with yesterdays leaks.. He will be gone, or naturalized..

But, in the real world, wonderful day and weekend coming, time to simply enjoy and having a good time..

Reply
Apr 20, 2018 13:41:32   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
permafrost wrote:
Kan,


Benghazi was a cluster****, but not a plot.. the investigations found nothing was done wrong. Tragic, yes.. so were the other incidents over the years..

"what difference does it make" This comment is presented out of context, it was not about the dead Americans, it was about the reason for the riot/attack.

A video? What a dumb thing to say.. Organized? probably.. But not about the deaths..


trump?... noose tightened another notch with yesterdays leaks.. He will be gone, or naturalized..

But, in the real world, wonderful day and weekend coming, time to simply enjoy and having a good time..
Kan, br br br Benghazi was a cluster****, but no... (show quote)

Once again Perm, I have to disagree. They never found anything to be wrong because it was investigated by the Obama and Clinton regime. And "what difference does it make now" wasn't taken out of context. I saw her say it on TV.
Anyway, you are right about one thing. The blizzard is over and it's a beautiful day. Time to enjoy some sunshine and warmer weather even if we are still surrounded by snow. lol. Have a.good one Perm. 😁😁

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.