Good point.

This may be another reason for these sanctuary cities....

According to Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) stats, illegal immigrants kill people at a rate that is over 100 times more frequent than school shootings with 21.3 school related deaths per year versus 2,380 killings per year by illegal immigrants. The numbers don't lie.

If the left really cared about violent crime in America and school shootings in particular, then they would be supporting Trump’s efforts to stop illegal immigration, build the wall, deport criminals, and put an end to sanctuary cities.
Simple as that.

The first sentence would have sufficed but thank you for answering the question, truncated as that answer may be. I truly don't care about the rest of it because it does not expand on the question derived from the topic; should teachers be armed. You could have discussed it. It has dawned on me however, after the many interchanges here that you are a true Marxist Little-Red-Book Communist. I don't say that to be insulting, just to recognize fact based behavior. You may not even realize you have achieved that recognizable level of Leftism. As such you dare not pass even the smallest opportunity to propagandize against that which the Collective has deemed evil. I get it. And at the same time you certainly dare not address core issues for which you have limited or no understanding and directive to not do. Let me explain;

The question of arming teachers goes much, much deeper than 'of course not'... To debate this question requires if not an understanding, at least a curiosity of the core problem and it's attendant question; why would we think teachers need to be armed? And here in resides the Achilles heel of communism - as Collective Central directs; to engage in the core issue is a trap. Never, ever address an issue head on. And as we see, all Leftist adhere strictly to this code. You are particularly adept at this practice of diversion and obfuscation, commendable traits in your world.

With that, I think we're done here.

That's wasn't the government it was the local citizens they were scared out of us ragged Okies would break into their houses and steal their stuff. The Hoovervilles were just ramshackle groups of us who couldn't find work gathered sleeping in cars or wooden leantoo's pieces of card board or what ever we could find to shelter the wife or kids while the men looked for work. There was no un- employment ins., Wealfare , food stamps or any kind of help. The Mexicans hated us because there was so many of us instead a nickle to pick a box of peaches they only had to pay 2.5 cents, and seventeen cents to pick a pound of cotton and a good hard working picker dragging a two ft by 8 ft cotton sack for 14 hrs could only pick 300 lbs of cotton

The United States Constitution does not specify any qualifications for Supreme Court justices, and no special requirements exist concerning age, education, profession, experience or citizenship. Justices do not need to have particular legal experience, nor do they need to be lawyers. However, as of 2014, all justices have had some sort of preparation in law. For example, during the 18th and 19th centuries, the United States did not have many law schools. Consequently, some of the justices were trained by legal mentors.
Certain justices followed unusual paths to the Supreme Court. For instance, James F. Byrnes, who served on the bench in 1941 and 1942, never finished high school. A self-taught lawyer, Byrnes passed the bar when he was 23 years old. Another example concerns Robert H. Jackson, who sat on the Supreme Court from 1941 to 1954. Though he never earned a bachelor's degree, Jackson completed Albany Law School in New York when he was 20 but was not awarded the advance degree at the time because rules stated that graduates from the program had to be at least 21. Instead, Jackson was issued a "diploma of graduation." Albany Law School did award him the degree almost 30 years later. The graduation year was identified as 1912.

Your version of the story doesn't add up Nicki.

And whether it was the "local citizens", farming industry, or local gov and law enforcement.....they wouldn't dare jack with any us if they know we are armed and not afraid to defend ourselves.

Dude, the 1930's called and they'd like you to time-travel back to that decade, knowing you are unarmed and would easily be forced into the Okie-migrant boxcar.

Here's what I read about it:


Farm Labor in the 1930s



During the 1930s, some 1.3 million Americans from the Midwest and southwest migrated to California, which had a population of 5.7 million in 1930s. The arrival of Okies and Arkies set the stage for physical and ideological conflicts over how to deal with seasonal farm labor and produced literature that resonates decades later, as students read and watch "The Grapes of Wrath" and farmers and advocates continue to argue over how to obtain and treat seasonal farm workers.

Carey McWilliams once said that farm labor in California has "been lost sight of and rediscovered time and again." (quoted in Loftis, p191) Three recent books make important contributions to our understanding of farm labor issues in the 1930s. Interestingly, two of the three are not about farm workers: instead, they focus on the people who interpreted the California farm labor story of the 1930s.
Source:
https://migration.ucdavis.edu/rmn/more.php?id=788