One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
More On Those Statistics
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 16, 2018 17:26:36   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
archie bunker wrote:
This is true. It seems to me that it has gotten a lot worse in the last several years. Can we blame it on technology, yeah, I think so. We have more access to more information than ever before. The problem is sorting out the truth from the outright lies, opinion, and spin.
To me it's like we, the voters are the kids caught up in an ugly divorce between two political parties.

And I feel like a step-child with red hair!
This is true. It seems to me that it has gotten a ... (show quote)


I have one simple question I ask myself when faced with a difficult political decision: Is it constitutionally authorized? If the constitution says it's kosher, then it's good policy. If it's not expressly authorized in the constitution, it's not allowed and the politician pushing it should be hung from his heels and horsewhipped.

That's how I keep my political opinions on an even keel.

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 18:31:39   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I have one simple question I ask myself when faced with a difficult political decision: Is it constitutionally authorized? If the constitution says it's kosher, then it's good policy. If it's not expressly authorized in the constitution, it's not allowed and the politician pushing it should be hung from his heels and horsewhipped.

That's how I keep my political opinions on an even keel.

Yeah, one doesn't have to read OPP often to know that it is full of constitutional scholars.

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 18:57:06   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
slatten49 wrote:
Yeah, one doesn't have to read OPP often to know that it is full of constitutional scholars.


The Constitution says what it says, and I can't see where it gives the SCOTUS the power to "interpret" the document that created SCOTUS.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2018 18:57:26   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
slatten49 wrote:
Yeah, one doesn't have to read OPP often to know that it is full of constitutional scholars.


Mmm-hmm. Outhouse lawyers more like. Granted, there's a few good ones. Most of them talk like they've never even read past the first few lines.

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 19:06:43   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
archie bunker wrote:
The Constitution says what it says, and I can't see where it gives the SCOTUS the power to "interpret" the document that created SCOTUS.


Plain English any high school student could read and understand, yet they keep 'finding' all kinds of oddball 'rights' and 'powers' nobody else seems to be able to identify. Gay 'marriage' anyone? How about that old shtick, abortion? Good luck finding that in there! I wonder if that woman sends her son a birthday card; I can see it now "Happy Birthday, son! I wanted you dead!".

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 19:15:11   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Plain English any high school student could read and understand, yet they keep 'finding' all kinds of oddball 'rights' and 'powers' nobody else seems to be able to identify. Gay 'marriage' anyone? How about that old shtick, abortion? Good luck finding that in there! I wonder if that woman sends her son a birthday card; I can see it now "Happy Birthday, son! I wanted you dead!".


"Shall Not Be Infringed" seems pretty clear to me.

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 19:18:42   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
"Shall Not Be Infringed" seems pretty clear to me.

Agreed.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2018 19:37:34   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
archie bunker wrote:
"Shall Not Be Infringed" seems pretty clear to me.


Yeah, but then they go and 'redefine' the phrase 'well regulated'. Back then, 'well regulated' meant 'in good working order' or 'serviceable'. But since then, the word 'regulated' has taken on a whole new life of its own, and the original intent is thrown out with the bathwater, because it fits the agenda, see? "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." Gotcha! Hence the big push for 'gun control'. Of course, there's no intention to just stop at limiting the firearms available to the general public, as if that isn't bad enough, oh no, that is just one more step in the push for their 'gun free' utopia. The second amendment clearly refers to a well-armed populace that is able to wield the weapons of war when necessary, not some 'pussified' gun club.

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 19:56:22   #
PLT Sarge Loc: Alabama
 
Well said, Amen.
debeda wrote:
You know we spend a lot of time insulting and demonizing democrats. When the truth is we should be pitying them. They are that segment of the population that are easily programmed and desire to be part of what they perceive as the "correct thinking ". When tjey do have an independent thought outside the narrative they quickly shut it down. Personally I'm glad to be a free thinking person without the need to think just like everyone else. Just follow the ten commandments and help where I can but have an active BS meter. Just sayin.....
You know we spend a lot of time insulting and demo... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 20:50:31   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Yeah, but then they go and 'redefine' the phrase 'well regulated'. Back then, 'well regulated' meant 'in good working order' or 'serviceable'. But since then, the word 'regulated' has taken on a whole new life of its own, and the original intent is thrown out with the bathwater, because it fits the agenda, see? "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." Gotcha! Hence the big push for 'gun control'. Of course, there's no intention to just stop at limiting the firearms available to the general public, as if that isn't bad enough, oh no, that is just one more step in the push for their 'gun free' utopia. The second amendment clearly refers to a well-armed populace that is able to wield the weapons of war when necessary, not some 'pussified' gun club.
Yeah, but then they go and 'redefine' the phrase '... (show quote)


We're on the same page, Larry. Problem is, some folks want to turn a simple phrase, on a single page into a book.
Just ask some people a yes, or no question, and see what it turns in to.

Reply
Feb 16, 2018 21:18:20   #
Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton
 
archie bunker wrote:
We're on the same page, Larry. Problem is, some folks want to turn a simple phrase, on a single page into a book.
Just ask some people a yes, or no question, and see what it turns in to.


I call them 'wafflers'. They'll waffle on for hours about what the meaning of 'is' is (remember that?). You know it's BS, they know it's BS and yet they keep on keeping on. I get to a point I just can't take it anymore and have to move on or blow a gasket. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is that thickheaded.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.