Article by Charles Krauthammer.
Dec 21, 2017 04:18:17 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
Krauthammer and this article aside, I'm just pointing out that, regardless how reliable you think Snopes is, others who have no ax to grind where Snopes is concerned, other than the desire for accuracy, have pointed out the bias and inaccuracies often attributed to Snopes, so-called, fact checks.
In other words if the facts don’t fit your flimsy narrative then attack the source ....classic Trumpski playbook.
Dec 21, 2017 05:05:11 #
eden wrote:
In other words if the facts don’t fit your flimsy narrative then attack the source ....classic Trumpski playbook.
Facts don’t fit with you people lie,lie,lie.
Dec 21, 2017 05:30:31 #
Dec 21, 2017 05:31:16 #
Hemiman wrote:
Facts don’t fit with you people lie,lie,lie.
Says the man who hangs on every word that fake news has to offer...
Dec 21, 2017 06:53:41 #
PeterS wrote:
Says the man who hangs on every word that fake news has to offer...
The light hasn't come on for you guys, has it PerterS? Everything you and the like-minded point out what you think we conservatives are guilty of, you're guilty of as well. Ha! Hypocrisy has difficulty recognizing itself. As for the Jade Helm episode: In my opinion, those who were suspicious and took action were, regardless of what you and others think, the smart ones.
Jade Helm? Perhaps you rember Pearl Harbor? A bit of suspicion acted on then, may have saved the day.
Dec 21, 2017 23:04:02 #
Dec 22, 2017 00:19:13 #
Richard Rowland wrote:
The light hasn't come on for you guys, has it PerterS? Everything you and the like-minded point out what you think we conservatives are guilty of, you're guilty of as well. Ha! Hypocrisy has difficulty recognizing itself. As for the Jade Helm episode: In my opinion, those who were suspicious and took action were, regardless of what you and others think, the smart ones.
Jade Helm? Perhaps you rember Pearl Harbor? A bit of suspicion acted on then, may have saved the day.
Jade Helm? Perhaps you rember Pearl Harbor? A bit of suspicion acted on then, may have saved the day.
Japan was at war then so there was reason for caution. The only ones at war under Obama were conservatives so not nearly the same thing...
Dec 22, 2017 00:21:53 #
SamFox wrote:
Looks like Pete can't refute the article. Just the usual pivoting jive.
SamFox
SamFox
The article was made up bullshit with no actual author attached to. You can't refute bullshit because as soon as you do you conservatives simply reach into your bag of bullshit and spread some more. The article was bogus. That's what refutes it right there....
Dec 22, 2017 14:57:04 #
no propaganda please
Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
PeterS wrote:
Japan was at war then so there was reason for caution. The only ones at war under Obama were conservatives so not nearly the same thing...
You are wrong there. The "progressives" were at war with the Constitution, christianity and Western culture. The war is still going on, and, sadly Socialism is winning.
Dec 22, 2017 20:35:02 #
eden wrote:
In other words if the facts don’t fit your flimsy narrative then attack the source ....classic Trumpski playbook.
Seems to be your playbook, also, eden. Just turn the words around to yourself, and see if they fit.
Dec 22, 2017 20:39:44 #
PeterS wrote:
The article was made up bullshit with no actual author attached to. You can't refute bullshit because as soon as you do you conservatives simply reach into your bag of bullshit and spread some more. The article was bogus. That's what refutes it right there....
Reach into your bag of bullshit and spread some more. Not sure why that strikes me as funny, but it caused a chuckle. Good one, Pete.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.