One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Roy Moore is needed in the GOP to improve family values.
Page <<first <prev 9 of 10 next>
Dec 10, 2017 12:07:36   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
bilordinary wrote:
Just from their comments, you can tell where these liberal deviates minds are, from the gutter it is hard to see anything but the gutter!


————
And, just how would you know about being in any gutters? Any 1st-hand experience?

These “liberal deviates” are discussing a serious issue about an alleged child sexual predator who’s running for the US Senate. I suppose to you that’s something to laugh about and belittle. If so, you’re no better than the child molester is. In fact, you’re “aiding and abetting” his illegal actions. That could make you “accessories after the fact.” Maybe, we should include you and hemiman in the Congressional investigation, should it come about.

Personally, I’d be saying, “I’ll take ‘water-boarding’ for $100, Alex,” before I’d sit before a Congressional hearing in defense of Moore’s case.

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 13:42:46   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
alabuck wrote:
————
And, just how would you know about being in any gutters? Any 1st-hand experience?

These “liberal deviates” are discussing a serious issue about an alleged child sexual predator who’s running for the US Senate. I suppose to you that’s something to laugh about and belittle. If so, you’re no better than the child molester is. In fact, you’re “aiding and abetting” his illegal actions. That could make you “accessories after the fact.” Maybe, we should include you and hemiman in the Congressional investigation, should it come about.

Personally, I’d be saying, “I’ll take ‘water-boarding’ for $100, Alex,” before I’d sit before a Congressional hearing in defense of Moore’s case.
———— br And, just how would you know about being i... (show quote)


alabuck: How can you take an allegation serious especially after the majority of them have been proven non-credible! There is no evidence what-so-ever! These deviates are trying to make this 39 year old mole hill into a typical democrat false mountain! The democrats are getting their asses kick in all phases of the political arena, and this dilemma has them in the septic tanks looking for all kinds of political trash!

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 13:46:38   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
alabuck: How can you take an allegation serious especially after the majority of them have been proven non-credible! There is no evidence what-so-ever! These deviates are trying to make this 39 year old mole hill into a typical democrat false mountain! The democrats are getting their asses kick in all phases of the political arena, and this dilemma has them in the septic tanks looking for all kinds of political trash!


Not in Virginia Jr.

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2017 13:59:37   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Not in Virginia Jr.


BB: Pretty bad score! I figure 35 to 15 with Conservatives in the lead!

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 14:05:23   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
BB: Pretty bad score! I figure 35 to 15 with Conservatives in the lead!


New math?

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 14:28:45   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
archie bunker wrote:
All I know about the guy is what I've read, and heard. I'm not much of a fan, but this whole thing doesn't pass the smell test for me.
I do know that the lady lawyer Gloria Allred has made a fortune off of political theatre, and always walks away with a pocket full of cash.
And do you really think congress can agree on a non biased forensic examiner to look at it, and accept the results? I don't myself.


—————-
I think Congress would/should get an FBI handwriting expert(s). In spite of what we hear from Trumpet’s luckiest, about the FBI being partisan, being a retired federal employee, myself, I believe that the FBI is as non-partisan as any government agency, local, county, state, or Federal.

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 14:53:37   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
ldsuttonjr wrote:
alabuck: How can you take an allegation serious especially after the majority of them have been proven non-credible! There is no evidence what-so-ever! These deviates are trying to make this 39 year old mole hill into a typical democrat false mountain! The democrats are getting their asses kick in all phases of the political arena, and this dilemma has them in the septic tanks looking for all kinds of political trash!


—————-

“... especially after the majority of them have been proven non-credible!“. ld, please, tell me which of the women’s accounts have been “... PROVEN to be non-credible?” Are you aware that the latest woman to say Moore sexually abused her and had a note from him in her yearbook from him, was NOT part of the original group? In fact, she said she had no plans to become a part of the complaint and that she had voted for Moore in the elections he ran. She changed her mind when she heard him claim to have NEVER dated high school girls. She said that comment made her to look like a liar since she said they dated for a coupled of months one summer and she had told many people about it over the years.

As to the “... 39 year old mole hill ...,” I pray that you don’t have any young girls/women in your immediate family. If you do, and with the attitude you display, you’d not believe them if they came to you with a story that they’ve been sexually assaulted. It’s your very own attitude that has stopped women from coming forward about sexual abusive behavior from men for over a millennium. Being told that, “You’re making-up these stories because ‘Uncle ld’ wouldn’t ever do something like that;” or, “If you say anything, you’ll lose your job.” Or, “If you tell, I’ll see to it that you disappear forever!”

Please, don’t even try to dispute these examples never happened. They fill police files all over the world.

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2017 16:51:29   #
wuzblynd Loc: thomson georgia
 
alabuck wrote:
———————

Why doesn’t an admission of guilt of sexual battery get Trumpet impeached? Just because he denies doing anything wrong, now, doesn’t exonerate him from the accusations, nor does it erase his original admittance to the crimes. Plus, that he’s now saying the tape is false, after he admitted his guilt, only makes him more guilty.

In the video that appears at the top of the article (see link below), Trumpet admits to his words and actions regarding how he treated women as was seen and heard by millions of people who watched the “Access Hollywood” video when it first appeared back in late 2016.

Plus, why would you lie so badly, saying that sexual predators are Democrats, when there’s been quite a few GOPTP Congressmen leaving recently, too, and for the same, exact reason? Also, should Roy Moore win the Alabama election, McConnell has promised him an “ethics investigation” as soon as he’s sworn-in.

Face it, fuzzy, all you know is what you’ve been told to repeat. There’s ZERO validity to what you’re posting.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/donald-trump-apology.html
——————— br br Why doesn’t an admission of guilt o... (show quote)





What I heard him say on tape was that "they LET you do that when you are rich" that's not a assault when they let you. You do understand the meaning of LET don't u . If not there is this guy named Webster u may want to check out.

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 17:47:15   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Liberals let their own slide, JFK LBJ, WJC, RFK and more, those crimes arent't 40 years old, lets take care of them first!
Isn't that serious?

alabuck wrote:
————
And, just how would you know about being in any gutters? Any 1st-hand experience?

These “liberal deviates” are discussing a serious issue about an alleged child sexual predator who’s running for the US Senate. I suppose to you that’s something to laugh about and belittle. If so, you’re no better than the child molester is. In fact, you’re “aiding and abetting” his illegal actions. That could make you “accessories after the fact.” Maybe, we should include you and hemiman in the Congressional investigation, should it come about.

Personally, I’d be saying, “I’ll take ‘water-boarding’ for $100, Alex,” before I’d sit before a Congressional hearing in defense of Moore’s case.
———— br And, just how would you know about being i... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 18:01:21   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
Bad Bob wrote:
New math?


Just pure logic....35 + 15 = 50 States!

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 18:34:40   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
alabuck wrote:
—————-

“... especially after the majority of them have been proven non-credible!“. ld, please, tell me which of the women’s accounts have been “... PROVEN to be non-credible?” Are you aware that the latest woman to say Moore sexually abused her and had a note from him in her yearbook from him, was NOT part of the original group? In fact, she said she had no plans to become a part of the complaint and that she had voted for Moore in the elections he ran. She changed her mind when she heard him claim to have NEVER dated high school girls. She said that comment made her to look like a liar since she said they dated for a coupled of months one summer and she had told many people about it over the years.

As to the “... 39 year old mole hill ...,” I pray that you don’t have any young girls/women in your immediate family. If you do, and with the attitude you display, you’d not believe them if they came to you with a story that they’ve been sexually assaulted. It’s your very own attitude that has stopped women from coming forward about sexual abusive behavior from men for over a millennium. Being told that, “You’re making-up these stories because ‘Uncle ld’ wouldn’t ever do something like that;” or, “If you say anything, you’ll lose your job.” Or, “If you tell, I’ll see to it that you disappear forever!”

Please, don’t even try to dispute these examples never happened. They fill police files all over the world.
—————- br br “... especially after the majority o... (show quote)


Alabuck, I honestly think you're being a partisan, unrealistic wuss here. And I say that with all due respect sir.
Women have always used their 'assets' to get their way with men, and when scorned by men, they are the victims.
Now we have this new fad of every woman who ever boob rubbed a man, and got what she asked for coming out as victims of men.

It's funny, how everyone demands equality, but women are the weaker sex when it comes to sexual advances. Women never do that, do they? I mean, use their bodies to get what they want, or compromise men in high places.
Why, all of a sudden, are they to be believed regardless of their credibility, and the man is automatically guilty?

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2017 19:02:29   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
wuzblynd wrote:
What I heard him say on tape was that "they LET you do that when you are rich" that's not a assault when they let you. You do understand the meaning of LET don't u . If not there is this guy named Webster u may want to check out.

———————

Fuzzy, I’m going to presume that you have kids. And, I’m going to presume that, on occasion, you’ve had to discipline them. Now, as the “authority figure/celebrity” in that situation, did your kids “let” you discipline them, or, did you just go ahead and do it?

You could say they “let” you dicipline them, simply because they had no other choices. “Letting” someone grope you implies having their permission to do so. From their accusations, they claim they NEVER gramt d him their permission to grope them.

Also, Mr Webster has a word you need to learn, “sarcasm.” You need to learn what it is when you hear it. Even Trump claimed his words were “sarcasm;” and “locker-room talk.”

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 21:23:12   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
archie bunker wrote:
Alabuck, I honestly think you're being a partisan, unrealistic wuss here. And I say that with all due respect sir.
Women have always used their 'assets' to get their way with men, and when scorned by men, they are the victims.
Now we have this new fad of every woman who ever boob rubbed a man, and got what she asked for coming out as victims of men.

It's funny, how everyone demands equality, but women are the weaker sex when it comes to sexual advances. Women never do that, do they? I mean, use their bodies to get what they want, or compromise men in high places.
Why, all of a sudden, are they to be believed regardless of their credibility, and the man is automatically guilty?
Alabuck, I honestly think you're being a partisan,... (show quote)

—————-

Archie, I’m sorry if I come across as being “partisian.” That’s not my intent. I do admit that much of my opinion comes from listening to what my wife, and other female members of my family, have experienced while working in their respective occupations.

Several of them have had unwanted sexual advances made toward them. The majority of the unwanted advances were made by their boss(es) or someone higher-up. The rest were from complete strangers in non-work situations. Two of the ladies who married-into the family were victims of familial incest in their nuclear families prior to marrying into my family. In all of these cases, the women didn’t come forward with their histories out of fear of reprisals by the perpetrators. Also, there was the known reaction of being called a liar for even accusing the perpetrators. If you had been called a liar for telling the truth, why would you ever want to continue telling th story?

As to why, all of a sudden, the women feel that with the change of perception about sweeping unwanted sexual advances under the rug, or justifying it by saying, “It’s just men-talk. They don’t mean anything you’re it,” maybe they feel safer being part of a group instead of coming out one at a time.

Also, just because a women shows off her figure, does that give a man permission to act like a Neanderthal and grab her by her hair and drag her off to have his way with her? He may “think” it, but that doesn’t give him permission to “act” on it. I’m sure, you have, just as I have, looked lustfully at a pretty woman and had thoughts of what I’d like to be doing with/to her. But, even though I may have thought it, I’d never try to act on it. It just, “ain’t fitt’n” to do such things. Those who try to force themselves on women because they think the women ”are asking for it”. simply don’t have the mental and emotional maturity to interact with the opponent sex.

Put yourself in their place. How would you like it if day in and day out you had to put up with constant cat-calls, unrequested sexual suggestions, intentional rubs against your body, or even outright offers of sexual favors that, of preformed, would help you advance in your career? These are some of the things the women in my extended family have had to endure in order to stay employed. Fortunately, none of them have had to perform any sexual acts, but a couple of them say the day is coming when they’ll be asked to do so. They can easily see the pattern of behavior as it unfolds. However, when the day comes, they’ll have a recording of it and the guy(s) involved will be outed and they and the company will be sued.

How would you like it if you’re on the beach with your 16 year old granddaughter who just happens to have a “killer body” and some 30-something guy with a wddding ring on, walks up to her and begins to complement her on her looks? Then, he asks her if she’d like to go back to his hotel room with him so they “... could get to know each other better?”

Well, that happened to me and my 16 year old granddaughter this past summer, in Gulf Shores, AL. I go up and gave that pervert a good cussing and threatened too shoot his sorry a$$ should he ever approach my granddaughter again. At first, he tried to call me in it. Then, I showed him the 9-mil I was carrying. He changed his tune very quickly and left us alone the rest of the trip.

The whole episode tore my granddaughter up. She can’t understand why older men want to hit on her just because of how she fills-out a bikini. She knows she has been blessed with a “nice figure” but so do a lot of guys and she doesn’t go around trying to get into their pants or even complement their abs or “packages.”

As to women using their sexuality to get what they want, I believe you’ve been reading too many XXX-rated stories. You should realize that 99.99% of that stuff is pure fantasy. And, the remaining .01% is only half-true. According to research done in the early 2000’s, less than .01% of women claim to WILLINGLY use their sexual favors as a tool for advancement. The vast majority of those women who did so were in the medical equipment and pharmaceutical sales, automobile sales, and real estate sales; all highly competitive sales industries where “any and all options are to be used to make a sale.”

Honestly, Arch, I think you’re trying to make the “exception” into the “rule,” here.

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 21:28:23   #
alabuck Loc: Tennessee
 
bilordinary wrote:
Liberals let their own slide, JFK LBJ, WJC, RFK and more, those crimes arent't 40 years old, lets take care of them first!
Isn't that serious?


——————-

Now we know you’re good at looking for the Dems who’ve been accused of womanizing, can you do a similar search of GOPers who’ve been accused of womanizing, too?

Hint: There are SEVERAL of them. Why haven’t you heard of them? Maybe it’s because the GOP is just as good at letting their own slide, too.

Reply
Dec 10, 2017 21:36:00   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
alabuck wrote:
—————-
I think Congress would/should get an FBI handwriting expert(s). In spite of what we hear from Trumpet’s luckiest, about the FBI being partisan, being a retired federal employee, myself, I believe that the FBI is as non-partisan as any government agency, local, county, state, or Federal.


But not the heads of either the DoJ or the FBI.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 10 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.