CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: "We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11" #3
This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.
Nov 24, 2017 22:08:45 #
payne1000 wrote:
Why would all 300 connections have to fail at the same time before a floor would collapse?Why don't you explain how an individual floor (slab) could collapse when that would require over 300 connections of the floor trusses to the vertical columns to fail at the same time?
Nov 25, 2017 08:53:45 #
emarine wrote:
You missed the point again... your dumb brick woul... (show quote)
Why didn't the floor supports fail in 1975 when the North Tower caught fire on the 11th floor and burned for twice as long as it did on 9/11?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html
Why did eyewitness reporters report huge explosions, secondary bombs in the towers and how the collapses looked like controlled demolitions?
https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU
Nov 25, 2017 09:02:33 #
emarine wrote:
because they were designed to support 1300Tons each not 90000Tons each... you can't use how much weight the vertical columns support that's not what failed...
Where do you get your 90,000 ton figure? Are you claiming that all the floor truss connections in all the upper floors failed at the same time?
How could the massive steel framework of the center core fail at all? It was designed to support three times the weight it held up.
.
Steel this massive does not collapse straight down.
Nov 25, 2017 09:06:21 #
emarine wrote:
No the floor is the floor & the walls are the walls...you have no valid intelligence... a common ladder has 2 vertical supports & steps or rungs... remove the rungs on a 1400ft tall ladder & see what happens...
When your argument is based on lies, you resort to arguing the meaning of words.
Nov 25, 2017 09:14:15 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Why would all 300 connections have to fail at the same time before a floor would collapse?
All 300 floor truss connections on every floor would have had to fail at the same time for the towers to fall straight down in the manner you anonymous shills are describing.
If that could happen, the floor truss connections releasing downward from the center core would have left the center core standing.
Watch the second building collapse on this video to see an example of how the center core would have remained standing: https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-adk-adk_sbnt&hsimp=yhs-adk_sbnt&hspart=adk&p=10+worst+controlled+demolitions#id=1&vid=8848c2df73ba2bb5810b9ca58c57559f&action=click
Nov 25, 2017 09:30:26 #
payne1000 wrote:
Why didn't the floor supports fail in 1975 when the North Tower caught fire on the 11th floor and burned for twice as long as it did on 9/11?
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html
Why did eyewitness reporters report huge explosions, secondary bombs in the towers and how the collapses looked like controlled demolitions?
https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html
Why did eyewitness reporters report huge explosions, secondary bombs in the towers and how the collapses looked like controlled demolitions?
https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU
Are you lame?... for the 500th time column damage & heat started the collapse & overload weight finished it... In a framed tube structure the vertical columns are the walls & the floor slabs & trusses are the floors ... there is nothing else that's structural... your sheetrock argument is pure stupidity as are all your theory's ...
Nov 25, 2017 09:33:53 #
payne1000 wrote:
When your argument is based on lies, you resort to arguing the meaning of words.
So the ladder example went over your head too... can't get any simpler than that...
Nov 25, 2017 09:45:16 #
payne1000 wrote:
When your argument is based on lies, you resort to arguing the meaning of words.
So you don't comprehend the difference between floors & walls?... now there's a lie now or are you retarded?...
Nov 25, 2017 09:52:39 #
emarine wrote:
Are you lame?... for the 500th time column damage & heat started the collapse & overload weight finished it... In a framed tube structure the vertical columns are the walls & the floor slabs & trusses are the floors ... there is nothing else that's structural... your sheetrock argument is pure stupidity as are all your theory's ...
Talk about lame . . . you totally ignored both my questions.
It's not difficult to understand why.
Nov 25, 2017 09:54:51 #
emarine wrote:
So the ladder example went over your head too... can't get any simpler than that...
Watch the second building collapse on this video to see how the center core would have remained standing if it hadn't been cut apart by explosive charges:
https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-adk-adk_sbnt&hsimp=yhs-adk_sbnt&hspart=adk&p=10+worst+controlled+demolitions#id=1&vid=8848c2df73ba2bb5810b9ca58c57559f&action=click
Nov 25, 2017 09:57:34 #
emarine wrote:
So you don't comprehend the difference between floors & walls?... now there's a lie now or are you retarded?...
You and your fellow anonymous shill don't know the difference between a floor and a floor slab.
Maybe if you had an identity which you could reveal to readers, you wouldn't come across as such a devious doofus.
Nov 25, 2017 10:40:35 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Why would all 300 connections have to fail at the same time before a floor would collapse?
You need to apologize to readers for posting an obviously retouched image of WTC7.
Nov 25, 2017 10:50:24 #
payne1000 wrote:
You and your fellow anonymous shill don't know the difference between a floor and a floor slab.
Maybe if you had an identity which you could reveal to readers, you wouldn't come across as such a devious doofus.
Maybe if you had an identity which you could reveal to readers, you wouldn't come across as such a devious doofus.
I believe the simple truth here is that both Blade & I can differentiate between a floor & floor slab & a wall which is not part of the floor no matter how hard you twist it... walls are vertical & floors are horizontal whether slab or not... WTF larry you have no argument here...grow up old man ... you're destroying the name larry payne's credibility once again...
Nov 25, 2017 11:08:48 #
payne1000 wrote:
You need to apologize to readers for posting an obviously retouched image of WTC7.
maybe its you argument that needs some retouching & apologizing...the damage to WTC7 is in the south face or front side behind the smoke ... you know the side facing the WTC towers that just collapsed from air craft impact damage, heat & gravity... Sherlock
Nov 25, 2017 12:12:03 #
emarine wrote:
I believe the simple truth here is that both Blade & I can differentiate between a floor & floor slab & a wall which is not part of the floor no matter how hard you twist it... walls are vertical & floors are horizontal whether slab or not... WTF larry you have no argument here...grow up old man ... you're destroying the name larry payne's credibility once again...
Arguing about the meaning of words is a straw man argument you use because you can't argue successfully against the real science of the tower collapses. BR even resorts to posting photos of WTC7 which have had damage added by retouching.
Here's the real science of 9/11:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.