One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Right wing perception of Russian Uranium in the US
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Nov 3, 2017 10:06:29   #
S. Maturin
 
tdsrnest wrote:
She already lost what is you’re obsession with the Clintons why not focus on the moron in the White House. What else can you investigate about Clinton. You tried three separate investigation spent ove $38 million over 6 years and found nothing. What do you expect to find.


To you, obviously, being aware of events and personalities happening all around us is being "obsessed". Man, you progressives are struggling.. desperate to deflect. Pathetic.

Reply
Nov 3, 2017 10:12:10   #
S. Maturin
 
PeterS wrote:
Okay, say Putin was involved--you are still talking about an action 3 years prior to an event. So why would Putin contact Hillary, someone he despised because of her intervention into his election, when she wasn't central to the sale of Uranium in the US? And just why would Putin go to all that trouble when he still wouldn't be able to export any Uranium without the approval of the Atomic Energy Commission; an agency associated with Energy not State?

You guys are spinning a wonderful conspiracy but you aren't tying it together. Hillary's voice was but one of 16 voices linked to CFIUS. If Putin was trying to organize this 3 years in advance why didn't he pay off other agencies--agencies he would need if he intended to purchase US Uranium ore?
Okay, say Putin was involved--you are still talkin... (show quote)


"Okay, say Putin was involved--you are still talking about an action 3 years prior to an event. So why would Putin contact Hillary, someone he despised because of her intervention into his election, when she wasn't central to the sale of Uranium in the US? And just why would Putin go to all that trouble when he still wouldn't be able to export any Uranium without the approval of the Atomic Energy Commission; an agency associated with Energy not State? "

You are honestly wondering why an old Russian cop (KGB, no less) would contact what is arguably the most crooked American we had in politics at the time?? Astounding.

Reply
Nov 13, 2017 09:43:37   #
Airforceone
 
Super Dave wrote:
Much was proven. Nothing was prosecuted.


Read the findings by the House and Senate investigations nothing was found that would come anywhere near a crime.

Reply
 
 
Nov 13, 2017 09:52:48   #
S. Maturin
 
tdsrnest wrote:
Read the findings by the House and Senate investigations nothing was found that would come anywhere near a crime.


YOUR interpretation.. Other, more qualified folks, know more than you and are certain that if the justice system had not lost the 'justice' part, things would be very different.

Reply
Nov 13, 2017 10:02:03   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You can't convince that guy of anything. He is such a partisan troll he never acknowledges malfeasance on his side of the aisle. For instance; Hillary was found guilty of mishandling classified information. Fact. Comey, decided not to bring charges. Fact. it wasn't Comey's job to bring charges or not to begin with. Fact. Comey found Hillary not criminally culpable because he says she had no intent to mishandle classified information. Fact. The statute dealing with this area of law specifically says intent is not needed to be in violation of said law. Fact. Many in the government have been accused and successfully prosecuted for violating the same statute Hillary violated and went to jail. Fact. Comey gave Hillary a pass and proved there is no equal justice under the law. Fact. Facts do not matter to lemmings like nest. Fact. Damn that's alot of facts.
S. Maturin wrote:
YOUR interpretation.. Other, more qualified folks, know more than you and are certain that if the justice system had not lost the 'justice' part, things would be very different.

Reply
Nov 13, 2017 10:03:21   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Oh yea Nest, Fact you.
JFlorio wrote:
You can't convince that guy of anything. He is such a partisan troll he never acknowledges malfeasance on his side of the aisle. For instance; Hillary was found guilty of mishandling classified information. Fact. Comey, decided not to bring charges. Fact. it wasn't Comey's job to bring charges or not to begin with. Fact. Comey found Hillary not criminally culpable because he says she had no intent to mishandle classified information. Fact. The statute dealing with this area of law specifically says intent is not needed to be in violation of said law. Fact. Many in the government have been accused and successfully prosecuted for violating the same statute Hillary violated and went to jail. Fact. Comey gave Hillary a pass and proved there is no equal justice under the law. Fact. Facts do not matter to lemmings like nest. Fact. Damn that's a lot of facts. Oh yea Nest; Fact you.
You can't convince that guy of anything. He is suc... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 13, 2017 10:20:51   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
tdsrnest wrote:
Read the findings by the House and Senate investigations nothing was found that would come anywhere near a crime.

Wrong...

They did not find that mishandling classified information is legal.

They did not find that that deleting subpoenaed documents is legal.

If you really think those things are illegal you really don't know what the word legal means.

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2017 22:19:45   #
Airforceone
 
S. Maturin wrote:
YOUR interpretation.. Other, more qualified folks, know more than you and are certain that if the justice system had not lost the 'justice' part, things would be very different.


Not sure what you’re talking about but okay

Reply
Nov 15, 2017 22:28:08   #
PeterS
 
S. Maturin wrote:
That "three years prior" stuff is nothing more than a head-fake. The transgression was done by a person posing as Sec. of State- one Hillary Clinton within the approval arena of one posing as president of the USA- one Barack Hussein Obama.

Keep the deflection within some portion of reality, will you?


Smith of Fox explains it pretty well...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5646426075001/?playlist_id=2694949843001#sp=show-clips

Reply
Nov 16, 2017 03:49:13   #
S. Maturin
 
PeterS wrote:
Smith of Fox explains it pretty well...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5646426075001/?playlist_id=2694949843001#sp=show-clips


Well, there ya go.

Another thread on this very site has addressed Smith's-- Ole Shep's -- hunger to join the Hillary-n-Barry team as it is run by Geo, Soros & Co.

Ole Shep, as he sees it, perhaps, can make more more filthy lucre by sucking up to Hillary's crowd than by attempting to be a real news analyst.

Reply
Nov 16, 2017 04:04:51   #
PeterS
 
S. Maturin wrote:
Well, there ya go.

Another thread on this very site has addressed Smith's-- Ole Shep's -- hunger to join the Hillary-n-Barry team as it is run by Geo, Soros & Co.

Ole Shep, as he sees it, perhaps, can make more more filthy lucre by sucking up to Hillary's crowd than by attempting to be a real news analyst.

Instead of attacking Shep why don't you attack what he said. What did he say that was inaccurate or an out and out lie. The accusation was that Hillary initiated a pay for play scheme involving our nations uranium supply. So the person, Frank Giustra, who gave the Clinton Foundation all but 4 million of the money involved sold all of his stock in Uranium One well before Hillary was even appointed as Sec of State. So how can you have a pay for play when no one benefits from the transaction? Doesn't that fact right there put an end to the fallacy you people are chasing?

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2017 04:08:14   #
PeterS
 
JFlorio wrote:
You can't convince that guy of anything. He is such a partisan troll he never acknowledges malfeasance on his side of the aisle. For instance; Hillary was found guilty of mishandling classified information. Fact. Comey, decided not to bring charges. Fact. it wasn't Comey's job to bring charges or not to begin with. Fact. Comey found Hillary not criminally culpable because he says she had no intent to mishandle classified information. Fact. The statute dealing with this area of law specifically says intent is not needed to be in violation of said law. Fact. Many in the government have been accused and successfully prosecuted for violating the same statute Hillary violated and went to jail. Fact. Comey gave Hillary a pass and proved there is no equal justice under the law. Fact. Facts do not matter to lemmings like nest. Fact. Damn that's alot of facts.
You can't convince that guy of anything. He is suc... (show quote)

And you just now figured out there isn't equal justice under the law? Damn J, no wonder you're so far behind...

Reply
Nov 16, 2017 04:26:21   #
S. Maturin
 
PeterS wrote:
Instead of attacking Shep why don't you attack what he said. What did he say that was inaccurate or an out and out lie. The accusation was that Hillary initiated a pay for play scheme involving our nations uranium supply. So the person, Frank Giustra, who gave the Clinton Foundation all but 4 million of the money involved sold all of his stock in Uranium One well before Hillary was even appointed as Sec of State. So how can you have a pay for play when no one benefits from the transaction? Doesn't that fact right there put an end to the fallacy you people are chasing?
Instead of attacking Shep why don't you attack wha... (show quote)


I'm just saying I do not trust anything he reports.

And, even though a previous investor drops out, that does not necessarily mean the guy is not still 'in the game'. He was 'in' when it all began, helped initially. It seems clear that once a player becomes involved with those Clintons, he/she cannot easily extricate him-herself from the gang. So, I could be piling/layering too much on Ole Shep's head, but he is one devious person and has shown himself to prefer a certain left slant.

You think I am being too much a curmudgeon on this? Perhaps you are right.

Reply
Nov 16, 2017 05:09:45   #
PeterS
 
S. Maturin wrote:
I'm just saying I do not trust anything he reports.

And, even though a previous investor drops out, that does not necessarily mean the guy is not still 'in the game'. He was 'in' when it all began, helped initially. It seems clear that once a player becomes involved with those Clintons, he/she cannot easily extricate him-herself from the gang. So, I could be piling/layering too much on Ole Shep's head, but he is one devious person and has shown himself to prefer a certain left slant.

You think I am being too much a curmudgeon on this? Perhaps you are right.
I'm just saying I do not trust anything he reports... (show quote)

Simply because he doesn't tell you what you want doesn't mean he can't be trusted. You can't have someone donate to the Clinton Foundation, then sell all of his stock, and then still later have Hillary appointed Sec of State and think that there is a pay for play? Pay for play between who? Not Hillary and the donner. So who gained something in the transaction?

Tell me how he knew that Hillary was going to be Sec of State and since he had no stock in the company what did he have to gain, besides philanthropy, by donating to the C Foundation? You are playing connect the dot to dots that just aren't there.

Reply
Nov 16, 2017 05:10:53   #
PeterS
 
S. Maturin wrote:
"Okay, say Putin was involved--you are still talking about an action 3 years prior to an event. So why would Putin contact Hillary, someone he despised because of her intervention into his election, when she wasn't central to the sale of Uranium in the US? And just why would Putin go to all that trouble when he still wouldn't be able to export any Uranium without the approval of the Atomic Energy Commission; an agency associated with Energy not State? "

You are honestly wondering why an old Russian cop (KGB, no less) would contact what is arguably the most crooked American we had in politics at the time?? Astounding.
i "Okay, say Putin was involved--you are sti... (show quote)

I assume you are talking about Trump correct?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.