A serious question for those who support abortion (Page 2): As I've said before I was once pro abortion, and even helped a friend kill her child. At the time I didn't want to think it...

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Mr Bombastic wrote:

Abortion, in my opinion, is worse than murder. Not only are you taking a life, you are taking it before it even has a chance to experience life. All of that untapped potential, gone. And remember. Your parents didn't abort YOU. How do you feel about that? Are you grateful to be alive? Would you rather have died before you even lived? Do you think those fetuses would rather be alive? To experience life? Like you had the opportunity to do

As I've said before I was once pro abortion, and even helped a friend kill her child. At the time I didn't want to think it was murder.

The parents of the child are also victims. As you would be if someone killed your child.

JW

Super Dave wrote:

If I observed someone killing your child, grandchild, or other family member, should I mind my own business and let the person killing your loved one make their own choice?

Or should I be a buttinski?

It's still apples and oranges...

Mr Bombastic

JW wrote:

It's still apples and oranges...

It's not apples and oranges. It's human lives. Anyone who would murder their own baby is a sick and evil person. Nothing you say will ever change that.

JW

E wrote:

But why can't the aborted (killed) babies make their choice for life?

If it can't experience life, it isn't alive. It may be living tissue but so is a wart. The fact that some people believe differently is irrelevant to the decision processes of the woman seeking a medical remedy to what she perceives to be a serious problem.

Terminating a pregnancy is psychological worlds away from killing a child. They can't get into your mindset and you can't get into theirs. For liberty to flourish, each must be allowed to run his and her own lives.

E

JW wrote:

If it can't experience life, it isn't alive. It may be living tissue but so is a wart. The fact that some people believe differently is irrelevant to the decision processes of the woman seeking a medical remedy to what she perceives to be a serious problem.

Terminating a pregnancy is psychological worlds away from killing a child. They can't get into your mindset and you can't get into theirs. For liberty to flourish, each must be allowed to run his and her own lives.

If it can't experience life, it isn't alive. >>> So, anyone in a coma should just be killed? They can't experience life. But a baby still in the womb is experiencing life. It's heart is pumping. It wiggles around and kicks. It consumes nourishment. And suddenly it cries and eats food. Eventually it learns to talk and walk. All part of the growing process that we go through, throughout our life as our bodies grow and age.

Terminating a pregnancy is psychological worlds away from killing a child. >>> But it is still killing a human being in the prebirth state.

They can't get into your mindset and you can't get into theirs. >>> I agree. But it is still killing a human life. I'm all for birth control, but once conception happens, that baby has a right to life in order for true liberty to flourish for all. Each must be allowed to attain actual birth and the right to grow and run his and her own lives.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

JW wrote:

It's still apples and oranges...

No...moral relativism.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

E wrote:

If it can't experience life, it isn't alive. >&... (show quote)

Might as well talk to a brick wall E .

Mr Bombastic

4430 wrote:

Might as well talk to a brick wall E .

The perfect example of a reprobate mind.

PEOPLE LIKE HIM ARE LITERALLY BLIND TO THE TRUTH. YOU COULD HIT THEM OVER THE HEAD WITH IT, AND IT WOULDN'T EVEN MAKE A DENT.

E

4430 wrote:

Might as well talk to a brick wall E .

Probably right. But it had to be answered and corrected. It was.

JW

E wrote:

If it can't experience life, it isn't alive. >&... (show quote)

I said nothing about killing anything. I said if it can't experience life, it isn't alive. In a coma or brain dead on life sustaining technology, a living organism for sure, alive, hardly.

To you it is killing a human life. To those supporting abortion, it is something very different. It is, to them, like an appendectomy or a transfusion. What you hold to be moral certainties are not so to everyone. To assume the right to impose your view on others is called despotism.

I am a Conservative but one thing that has always bothered me about my fellow Conservatives is their absolute commitment to get that fetus through the birth canal and their equal ardor for abandoning it the second it's born. The innate hypocrisy is mind boggling in its openness.

JW

Mr Bombastic wrote:

The perfect example of a reprobate mind.

PEOPLE LIKE HIM ARE LITERALLY BLIND TO THE TRUTH. YOU COULD HIT THEM OVER THE HEAD WITH IT, AND IT WOULDN'T EVEN MAKE A DENT.

A lot of people with your attitudes call themselves Muslims.

I see both sides of the issue. I have not said which side I'm on. You might try to see where opposing views are coming from rather than just condemning others.

JW

mwdegutis wrote:

No...moral relativism.

Define what that is... as you see it. It doesn't mean what you seem to imply.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

JW wrote:

Define what that is... as you see it. It doesn't mean what you seem to imply.

The truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to the moral standard of some person or group of persons.

Abortion is murdering an unborn human life. That is an absolute truth.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

JW wrote:

It's still apples and oranges...

No, its born living human beings and unborn living human beings.

Apples aren't unborn oranges.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

Super Dave wrote:

No, its born living human beings and unborn living human beings.

Apples aren't unborn oranges.