CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: "We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11" #2
This topic is locked to prevent further replies.
This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.
This discussion is continued in a new topic. You can find it here.
This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.
You can find the follow-up topic here.
Oct 18, 2017 09:01:01 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
How could he possibly understand Newton's laws, E, explosives have blown his mind.
Explosives such as those described here? https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU
Explosives such as those seen here?
Oct 18, 2017 09:03:58 #
payne1000 wrote:
You refuse to identify yourself. If you identify yourself you could prove you're not a Zionist shill.
As long as you hide who you are, the stigma remains.
I don't complain to Admin about anything. If Admin reprimands you, it's caused by your disregard for forum rules.
As long as you hide who you are, the stigma remains.
I don't complain to Admin about anything. If Admin reprimands you, it's caused by your disregard for forum rules.
@ this point Ide rather study Hebrew Buddy...
Oct 18, 2017 09:04:05 #
emarine wrote:
I thought this crude drawing was easy enough to understand without all the technical jargon...all he had to do was follow the "down" arrow in the middle... & think...
You resort to crude drawings because you're defending lies.
Accurate and detailed drawings would expose your lies.
Oct 18, 2017 09:06:40 #
payne1000 wrote:
It's revealing that you don't explain what you claim I don't understand.
This is what I do understand:
This is what I do understand:
follow the "down" arrows & think...
Oct 18, 2017 09:09:36 #
emarine wrote:
@ this point Ide rather study Hebrew Buddy...
You need to study English.
It might help you keep your job.
Oct 18, 2017 09:13:50 #
emarine wrote:
follow the "down" arrows & think...
You can't come up with detailed and accurate drawings?
You appear to be getting weary of defending lies.
Oct 18, 2017 20:40:21 #
payne1000 wrote:
You can't come up with detailed and accurate drawings?
You appear to be getting weary of defending lies.
You appear to be getting weary of defending lies.
Sounds more like you can't come up with a sane argument... let's see If have it right now... the "perps" blew the crap out of every floor sequentially from exactly where the jet planes crashed downward to the base... but made it look like a gravity collapse to fool people... I think you should think for a while ... maybe sleep on it & see if you choose to continue....
Oct 18, 2017 21:43:11 #
payne1000 wrote:
No, we haven't failed to address any of that, we've done so many times. Failure to comprehend is your problem. You are so stuck on the controlled demolition fantasy that you can't see the forest for the trees.You fail to address the fact that Newton's Third Law would cause falling floors to slow down with each floor they collided with . . . not speed up as you claim.
You fail to address the fact that all floors were firmly connected to the massive steel center core which could not possibly collapse straight down.
You fail to address the fact that 80% to 90% of all the upper floor debris was exploded outward hundreds of feet and little was left to crush the lower floors.
You fail to address the fact that all floors were firmly connected to the massive steel center core which could not possibly collapse straight down.
You fail to address the fact that 80% to 90% of all the upper floor debris was exploded outward hundreds of feet and little was left to crush the lower floors.
Oct 19, 2017 08:52:06 #
emarine wrote:
Sounds more like you can't come up with a sane argument... let's see If have it right now... the "perps" blew the crap out of every floor sequentially from exactly where the jet planes crashed downward to the base... but made it look like a gravity collapse to fool people... I think you should think for a while ... maybe sleep on it & see if you choose to continue....
They attempted to make it appear to be a gravity collapse. Unfortunately they could not hide the massive explosive debris clouds or the sound of the explosions.
Fortunately for the perps, they had Jewish control of the media which could censor these eyewitness reports: https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU
Oct 19, 2017 08:56:42 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
No, we haven't failed to address any of that, we've done so many times. Failure to comprehend is your problem. You are so stuck on the controlled demolition fantasy that you can't see the forest for the trees.
You haven't answered any of the questions. I'll give you another chance:
You fail to address the fact that Newton's Third Law would cause falling floors to slow down with each floor they collided with . . . not speed up as you claim.
You fail to address the fact that all floors were firmly connected to the massive steel center core which could not possibly collapse straight down.
You fail to address the fact that 80% to 90% of all the upper floor debris was exploded outward hundreds of feet and little was left to crush the lower floors.
Oct 19, 2017 09:02:28 #
payne1000 wrote:
They attempted to make it appear to be a gravity collapse. Unfortunately they could not hide the massive explosive debris clouds or the sound of the explosions.
Fortunately for the perps, they had Jewish control of the media which could censor these eyewitness reports: https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU
Fortunately for the perps, they had Jewish control of the media which could censor these eyewitness reports: https://youtu.be/VwjRaadx-QU
So now you're backpedaling again to "attempted" from your original ludicrous statement... you don't even have confidence in yourself buddy...
Oct 19, 2017 09:16:39 #
emarine wrote:
So now you're backpedaling again to "attempted" from your original ludicrous statement... you don't even have confidence in yourself buddy...
"Attempted" is accurate. They were not successful in hiding the explosions. There is no "backpedaling" in my statement. There are, however, indications of desperation in your obviously false statements.
Oct 19, 2017 16:08:06 #
payne1000 wrote:
"Attempted" is accurate. They were not successful in hiding the explosions. There is no "backpedaling" in my statement. There are, however, indications of desperation in your obviously false statements.
You're still backpedaling Buddy... when attempting to hard sell crazy you must remain focused & unwavering in your crazy...in your original statement you said that the perp's made the controlled demolition look like a gravity collapse...very plain & simple statment... that in itself was crazy but provided us "readers" some form confidence that maybe your not totally crazy until they think about what you said... Then you changed to when the perp's "Attempted" to hide the explosions you show the lack of self confidence required to hard sell crazy... you need to step up your game...
Oct 19, 2017 16:23:15 #
payne1000 wrote:
Newton's laws don't "cause" anything.You haven't answered any of the questions. I'll give you another chance:
You fail to address the fact that Newton's Third Law would cause falling floors to slow down with each floor they collided with . . . not speed up as you claim.
You fail to address the fact that Newton's Third Law would cause falling floors to slow down with each floor they collided with . . . not speed up as you claim.
The upper 15 top floors of the North Tower weighed 61915359kgs (68250 tones)
The 95th floor was 351.5 meters above ground.
Take one steel ball that weighs 62 million kgs (68250 tons) and one steel ball that weighs 45.3kgs (100 pounds),
Drop both balls in clear air from a height of 351.5 meters above ground,
both balls will impact the ground in 8.47 seconds,
the speed of both balls at impact will be 83 meters/second (298.81 km/h)
Energy at impact: Big ball = 213279837147.30 joules, little ball = 156248.84 joules
Quote:
No, I didn't fail to address this, I refrained from addressing it. If you don't understand the way in which the towers were constructed, there is no point in trying to explain how the connections of the trusses to the vertical support columns failed.You fail to address the fact that all floors were firmly connected to the massive steel center core which could not possibly collapse straight down.
Quote:
How do you know "that 80% to 90% of all the upper floor debris was exploded outward hundreds of feet and little was left to crush the lower floors"? Chandler and Bolldwyn got it wrong, so why don't you address this problem without parroting their mistakes.You fail to address the fact that 80% to 90% of all the upper floor debris was exploded outward hundreds of feet and little was left to crush the lower floors.
Oct 19, 2017 16:30:29 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
How do you know "that 80% to 90% of all the upper floor debris was exploded outward hundreds of feet and little was left to crush the lower floors"? Chandler and Bolldwyn got it wrong, so why don't you address this problem without parroting their mistakes.
so why don't you address this problem without parroting their mistakes
Because he can't...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.