Refute This.
Sep 22, 2017 21:00:59 #
Kazudy wrote:
I know that it wasn't a grape, but what ever it was, I don't see any fruit that is tempting to the eyes. Some form of porn fruit? Who knows? Not me, do you?
I get a woody just looking at a bowl of raspberries and creme. Just saying.
Sep 23, 2017 11:09:12 #
Mr Bombastic wrote:
I get a woody just looking at a bowl of raspberries and creme. Just saying.
Ha ha.
Sep 24, 2017 10:36:41 #
Sensible Woman wrote:
Are you telling me you know her well enough to call her "bad"
We know enough ABOUT her to call her "BAD"!!!
Sep 24, 2017 14:31:53 #
Sep 25, 2017 10:10:02 #
Oct 30, 2017 08:22:30 #
Bevos wrote:
Even MORE CORRECT!!!
Who here is aware that Bevos was kicked off of OPP?
I wonder why?
Any others?
Going after liberals will get you kicked off?
Bevos never used fowl language as I recall; what is up?
Oct 30, 2017 10:28:01 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Who here is aware that Bevos was kicked off of OPP?
I wonder why?
Any others?
Going after liberals will get you kicked off?
Bevos never used fowl language as I recall; what is up?
I wonder why?
Any others?
Going after liberals will get you kicked off?
Bevos never used fowl language as I recall; what is up?
When did Bevos get kicked off here? Bevos has never used fowl language that I am aware of.
Oct 30, 2017 12:08:14 #
bahmer wrote:
When did Bevos get kicked off here? Bevos has never used fowl language that I am aware of.
She E mailed me a few days ago. I think about 2 weeks ago.
So Admin is now censoring conservatives?
That was what made OPP unique.
Not letting the PTB censor.
Oct 30, 2017 15:33:36 #
eagleye13 wrote:
She E mailed me a few days ago. I think about 2 weeks ago.
So Admin is now censoring conservatives?
That was what made OPP unique.
Not letting the PTB censor.
So Admin is now censoring conservatives?
That was what made OPP unique.
Not letting the PTB censor.
Wow, that's too bad. I'm probably next.
Oct 30, 2017 15:48:29 #
Kazudy wrote:
Wow, that's too bad. I'm probably next.
Me to. Not sure what criteria ADMIN is using?
Liberals need censorship to survive.
They might by crying hard.
Nov 2, 2017 02:58:16 #
The Universe will expand with the realm of science. In fact, it is expanding now. Darwin's theory holds up pretty well, although there are exceptions. Exceptions that will doubtless be explained with the advancement of science. And what do you know about energy? Did you know lightning flows from the ground to the sky? Probably not. There's nothing wrong with denying a Supreme Being. It will keep us pushing along. I don't think we will go to hell because we are stubbornly curious creatures. If there is a God, he made us to doubt and find alternative explanations.
Nov 2, 2017 04:03:04 #
kcstargoat wrote:
The Universe will expand with the realm of science... (show quote)
And after examining those alternative explanations, he gave you enough brains, (if you can get your selfish, carnal desires out of the way) to figure out that those alternative explanations have holes in them, and that everything still comes back to the necessity of a creator. Take for example the myriad of flying bugs and birds. Do you really think they just started developing wings with no intelligent designer knowing what those eventual aerodynamicly perfect appendages were going to turn out to enable those creatures to do. When you think about it, you should be laughing at all those bugs and birds flapping those undeveloped Half wings trying to get off the ground for 1,000,000 years, during their development. If you have a brain in your head you must realize there is no purpose or reason that these wings would start developing out of nothing at all without an intelligent designer who that idiot Darwin is trying to deny with his nonsense.
Nov 2, 2017 05:03:59 #
Steve700 wrote:
And after examining those alternative explanations... (show quote)
No offense, but I don't think you have a good understanding of Darwin and evolutionary development. Your question is answered there.
Nov 2, 2017 08:22:18 #
kcstargoat wrote:
No offense, but I don't think you have a good understanding of Darwin and evolutionary development. Your question is answered there.
Funny!
KC; you must believe that a hummingbird, was a hum-dinger for many many years.
Nov 3, 2017 03:43:56 #
kcstargoat wrote:
No offense, but I don't think you have a good understanding of Darwin and evolutionary development. Your question is answered there.
No it isn't, And You Can't Answer It Either.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.