he was after all a democrate
A sad state for a great American, and a great soldier. What are they going to do, tear up his grave next, and plow under his former property, Arlington National Cemetery? He didn't fight for slavery. He fought for his state of Virginia. And he fought admirably.
funguy1949 wrote:
he was after all a democrate
As were all southern conservatives of the day...
E wrote:
A sad state for a great American, and a great soldier. What are they going to do, tear up his grave next, and plow under his former property, Arlington National Cemetery? He didn't fight for slavery. He fought for his state of Virginia. And he fought admirably.
He was a secessionist--he fought to break up this country and he fought admirably. And I think removing his statues from our public property is enough. If one of you conservatives want his statues then buy them and give them a home...
Btw...
DACAs Are Not Only NOT Over-Achievers
They Can Be Over 55yrs Old
PeterS wrote:
He was a secessionist--
Are You Aware Connecticut Met To Secede During The War Of 1812 ??
Quote:
he fought to break up this country and he fought admirably.
He Fought For His State, Union State Armies Did Too
Things Were Different Back Then
Visit Any Civil War Battlefield Park And Read The Tour
The Union Would Have Lived On, And Slavery Would Have Died Of It's Own Weight
Except For Those That Can Afford House Servants
Libs Love Their Nannies (Like The Obamas) Gardeners And Maids
We're too busy drinking HUD kool aide
E wrote:
A sad state for a great American, and a great soldier. What are they going to do, tear up his grave next, and plow under his former property, Arlington National Cemetery? He didn't fight for slavery. He fought for his state of Virginia. And he fought admirably.
Then why was there a statue in Texas? Lee had never even BEEN to Texas.
lpnmajor wrote:
Then why was there a statue in Texas? Lee had never even BEEN to Texas.
I don't know. Perhaps we should ask the Texans who had the statue erected. But don't ask the cowards who had it removed quietly in the night.
E wrote:
A sad state for a great American, and a great soldier. What are they going to do, tear up his grave next, and plow under his former property, Arlington National Cemetery? He didn't fight for slavery. He fought for his state of Virginia. And he fought admirably.
Robert E. Lee was the greatest American soldier this great nation has ever produced. All you have to do is study his great accomplishments on the battlefield. If he had Jackson at Gettysburg, the outcome might have been different. Both, together, were a legend.
We don't give up easily. Man, those are fighting words. Perhaps the public was not informed or people realize they'll just be called racist and white supremacists and the statue will come down anyway. I'm sure the media was there waiting to cover a big riot and make white conservatives look really bad. Fooled 'em, we did.
lpnmajor wrote:
Then why was there a statue in Texas? Lee had never even BEEN to Texas.
Everyone loves a true hero and gentleman and that is what Lee was. Even Texans can recognize those traits. So there you have it. I'm shocked that YOU would ask such a question.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.