sboy wrote:
There are eight-nine billion human beings on earth now. We just do not need any more. The more people on earth, the more wars, starvation, crime, etc. Do you get it? Sooner, or later, there comes a time when the imbalance creates more problems than if the unwanted embryo was terminated in the beginning. That is why I and many other people support a woman's right to choose. It is just another way to solve the problem of overpopulation and save the planet.
Why do you assume there is an imbalance? Because the elite pay them to tell you that, and thus you believe it?? (much like the elites tell you there was a Trump/Russia Collusion so you believe that lie to)
So do you also support a woman's 'choice' if it's to kill her husband? or a child that is already born?? Why shouldn't she have the right to make that choice?? I mean after all the more people on earth the more wars, starvation, crime, ect. The same argument for that as her decision to kill her unborn child could certainly be used.
Over population of the earth is a myth.
While it might be true some cities are overpopulated, it is NOT true that the world is over populated.
https://overpopulationisamyth.com/Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZVOU5bfHrMhttp://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/14/opinion/overpopulation-is-not-the-problem.htmlIt's a huge number. But it's not what you think.
https://overpopulationisamyth.com/content/episode-5-7-billion-people-will-everyone-please-relax"The concept of overpopulation originated in England in 1798, when the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus saw that food production increased incrementally, while people reproduced exponentially. Based on his calculations, he predicted that the world would be out of food by the year 1980. Malthus blamed reduced mortality rates and encouraged population reduction."
In his Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus calls for increased mortality among the poor:
"All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… To act consistently therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. (Book IV, Chap. V) "
Not only that, he believed certain diseases should not sought to be cured for the sake of population control.
“But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. (Book IV, Chap. V) —
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/10/25/overpopulation-a-fact-or-myth/People really need to start educating themselves, learn the FACTS.
Stop eating the bullshit they are feeding you.