Not true at all JFlorio. I was all for the Hillary hearings and if there's evidence - not speculation, conjecture or creative filling in of facts - then by all means she should be charged/convicted.

But you didn't answer about the evidence for Trump's collusion, or his campaign's. Do you see it or are there 100 excuses for why it's not collusion? And whether you think he should face criminal charges. Or if he should parole his son if convicted (and Trump's not).

Maybe you can say how you feel of no visitor logs, or of false claims of no meetings, and to show you are not dogmatically partisan, don't you think he should - as 40 years of presidents have - turn over his tax returns? Didn't he say he would? Or are you only interested in transparency, honesty and forthcoming-ness of documents or SIM cards that hold important information - if it's related to Hillary?

Need I remind you that collusion is not illegal? That's the problem here. So Trump jr, spoke with Russia(a lawyer from Russia not even connected to the Kremlin or the KGB) about Clinton evidence of illegal activity. Apparently the information was not creditible therefore Trump jr, dismissed it.

Just because there was negotiations with the Russians does not make it illegal. Remember we are not at war with Russia. And no sensitive information concerning classified information was released to Russia. So the fact stands, what crime was committed?

Now, looking at the DNC, and I feel sorry they got hacked but Hillary's track record with emails and cyber security is very poor. She got in trouble when she was Secretary of State, then she was running for president and her party was attacked by hackers. This is where the investigation needs to look.

But there is no press coverage on that simple fact. Trump jr actions don't seem suspicious to me, because in my opinion the info the Russian lawyer had on Clinton, the FBI already knew about.

So to me I think, the illegal activity is actually coming from the Clinton camp because no crime has been committed and if a crime was committed then wouldn't we have an indictment by now? Two years of investigation and not a hint of a crime?

You do know there were 4 Russians at that meeting don't you

te=Mr Shako]In an "effort to share perspectives,"I believe you need to get your facts syou do aight. No one, to my knowledge (and you're free to correct me on this point), has disputed it was a friend of young Trump's that e-mailed him he had an "individual", supposedly in the know, who had "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. Did young Trump want to hear what it was? He said, basically, "Hell, yes!" Since US politics has been cutthroat ever since GW retired back to Mt Vernon, you would know from your study of US History that this, IMO, was a normal reaction. (Do you remember the SEALED divorce papers of Obama's GOP rival in the former's run for the Illinois Senate seat being made public--a clear violation of Illinois law? Seems he wanted to be a "swinger" and his ex emphatically said,"No way, brother! Hence, the divorce. A lot of people believe to this day, the Daley machine brought about their release. As you could imagine, Obama brought it up and the Republican didn't beat him. Cutthroat politics at its best--or worse, of course) Young Trump met this individual , a known lobbyist for the Russian govt, and was surprised to find out she didn't have the goods on the bee-yatch at all but only wanted to talk about US restrictions placed on the Russian gov't, but in particular, certain Russian oligarchs in a possible trade-off for Putin's retaliatory freezing America's childless parents from adopting little Russian bastards, and thus denying them a chance for a better life. After listening to her blather for approx. 30 mins, he abruptly adjourned the mtg (just the fact he met with her later dubbed "treason" by the bee-yatch's choice for VP)[what does this tell you about Hillary Clinton's mind-set or worse, what might have transpired should she be forced from office [Lock her up! Lock her up!] and Kaine made POTUS? ]. From what I gather, Trump and this Russian lawyer never saw each other again. Now...is what I posted correct...or do you have another version you'd like to put forth?