One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Tempest in a teapot: Jared's back channels to Russia
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jun 1, 2017 17:56:32   #
son of witless
 
PeterS wrote:
Sure, unless he's okay with it leaking like a sive (sp)....


I never thought you and I would agree on anything about Trump.

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 00:29:19   #
EmilyStrode
 
robmull wrote:
You betcha', AO; and I'd bet dollars to donuts that the Navy SEAL team in the American military helicopter that was fatally shot down just after the ben Laden raid, flying low and fast and {supposedly} undetectable, in an uncharted region, was because of "C" {"whatever THAT means"} unsecured Hillary emails going into the Middle-Eastern war-zones, that were hacked by Islamic terrorists; because an American SEAL team, {in helicopters}, had just wasted their main-man leader!!! Interesting. Like the Benghazi massacre. I'd again bet dollars to donuts that the Benghazi Islamic terrorists knew that Ambassador Stevens was due in Benghazi {at a certain time}, even before the CIA in the American compound knew; and, in their "jihad" manner, carefully arranged a bang-up Islamic terrorist greeting for him!!! And how-about that never rescinded "stand-(D)own" order, over a 13 hour chase and torture, that could ONLY have been given {and/or rescinded}, by the most senior person "in-the-loop." Hummmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!" Now; "(D)RAIN THAT {RADICAL LOONY SECULAR JACKASS LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE "LEFTY"} SWAMP!!!"
You betcha', AO; and I'd bet dollars to donuts tha... (show quote)


Total non sequitur!

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 00:30:20   #
EmilyStrode
 
Randy131 wrote:
Who could blame Trump's administration for looking for something like this, for they knew they were being surveilled by Obama and his "Deep State", as President Trump said Obama and intelligence agencies were "Wire Tapping" (an outdated description for surveilance in the digital age) him and his campaign and administration, and this has been proven by the "Unmasking Scandal" of our favorite "whore liar" Susan Rice, who Obama uses as a whore for all his lies that he wants the public to hear. They broke no laws, just looked for a way to communicate with Russia, and others, without Obama and his "Deep State" constantly surveiling him and leaking everything, even classified materials, that they were doing or planning to do, to the liberal biased media.

Since this really isn't against the law, and no law has been broken, why are they making a big deal out of it, and not investigating the surveillance of our President, and the leaking of classified materials, which all are against the law to do?

Could it be because Obama's "Deep State" really does exist, and they all are out to get and destroy the President that the people elected, and have been trying to do this when he was first elected and only the President-Elect, and still has done anything wrong when his administration is only 4 months old.
Who could blame Trump's administration for looking... (show quote)


I said it was no big deal, remember?

Reply
 
 
Jun 2, 2017 00:31:42   #
EmilyStrode
 
Randy131 wrote:
Really? Huh??? You don't see me defending Jared Kushner and the Trump administration for looking for a "Back Channel" communication system with Russia, so they don't have to use the system that Obama is having his "Deep State" do surveillance of? Did you not know and understand why they were trying to do it, while communicating with the Russians is not illegal? I only showed a motive for why they were even attempting the "Back Channel" communicatons with the Russians, to stop all the surveillance of that communications, which has led to the leaks of classified materials, while the surveillance of our President, and the leaking of classified materials to the liberal media for publication, is against our laws.
Really? Huh??? You don't see me defending Jared ... (show quote)


What is the theme song for "The Twilight Zone"?

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 00:33:50   #
EmilyStrode
 
PeterS wrote:
Setting up secure lines hiding from your own national security. Yep that sounds like a good idea to me--don't see why anyone would have any problems with it...


Obama did it with Iran. It is not illegal or against security protocols.

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 00:35:26   #
EmilyStrode
 
Gatsby wrote:
OK PeterS. since you clearly know nothing about communications security, I will spell it out for you.

The story stated that the information came from intercepted message traffic,

message traffic between the Russian ambassador and Moscow.

Only Hillary is stupid enough to transmit such sensitive information in the clear (un-encrypted).

Encryption codes are the MOST SENSITVE SECRETS that any nation possess.

To READ the message, it first had to be de-crypted, which can only be done if the code is broken.

Our news media is routinely passing such classified information to our enemies, just to increase revenue.

President Trump shared information about terrorist plans with Russia, the media then shared that information,

as well as the even more sensitve source, with the terrorists, by publishing it.

Briton shared highly classified information about the Manchester bomber with the U.S.,

the news media passed the information directly to ISIS, by publishing it.
OK PeterS. since you clearly know nothing about co... (show quote)


Too freaking funny.

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 00:36:37   #
EmilyStrode
 
son of witless wrote:
No Shinola Sherlock. The way the Democratic hacks in the national security leak, why not. Haven't you heard of how the British are royally pissed about the American leaks over the last bombing? Obama has left a host of criminal leakers in every cubby hole he could. Having a back channel is good and it is legal.

And you know what, I betcha your lad Obama and your gal Hillary had the same type of back channels. I can't prove it, but I am sure it is true.


They did, Iran was one.

Reply
 
 
Jun 2, 2017 00:37:44   #
EmilyStrode
 
PeterS wrote:
Hey, don't blame Obama--Trumps the one who refuses to fire anyone. As for what you are certain of and can't prove--excuse me while I have a good chuckle...


Trump fired every lawyer in the Justice department. What planet?

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 00:42:02   #
PeterS
 
Gatsby wrote:
The deluge of leaks from the intelligence community did not begin with President Trumps election.

1. The existence of these leaks fully justifies back channel communitcations.

2. You want to know his "motivation"? How about saving this country from morons like you.

You, and the media, demand that President Trump prove his innocence to your satisfaction.

To bad for you, this is America, President Trump does not have to prove his innocence!

You have yet to present any EVIDENCE of any wrong doing on President Trumps part!

You have yet to present any EVICENCE of any wrong doing on Kushner's part!

All you do have is your impotent rage, at the rejection of your socialist agenda.

Your Impotance does explain your Anger and Frustration though.






All you have presented is your mindless drivel, ignorance of the FACTS, and your stupidity.

Perhaps some day stem cell research will find a way to grow you a brain.
The deluge of leaks from the intelligence communit... (show quote)


You really have to be kidding. You do realize that Trump was trying to circumvent US intelligence agencies all together by going through the Russian communication apparatus. You can't sit there and tell me you are okay with that--especially given that he is suspected of colluding with the Russians during the election. Yeah boy, give me some stem cells, I'm the one who needs the brain.

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 00:46:09   #
EmilyStrode
 
Gatsby wrote:
You really did hijack a truck load of STUPID!
I did not duck your questions, I ignored them, as the ignorant drivel that they are.
All you have to offer is ignorant drivel!
Every time that you cite or repeat some bit of leaked intelligence information,
you condone the traitors that leaked the information.
And that is spitting in the faces of Americas finest, ranks that you will never be fit to join!

Semper Fi.


So you swallow "ignorant drivel"? No rebuke or puke? Just some mamsy whine that is totally irrelevant. Marine. The so-called "ignorant drivel" is the enemy. He is infiltrating our base. Posing a direct threat to personnel. What is your response? "I ignore them." Dereliction of duty and possibly treason. Have a nice day.

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 08:23:59   #
son of witless
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
They did, Iran was one.


These Klowns in the media know their audience is brain dead stupid. If the same standard they are using on Trump was applied to Obama, the Kommunist idiot would have been impeached in his second year.

Reply
 
 
Jun 2, 2017 09:03:51   #
Gatsby
 
You have to ignore the facts, don't you?

No such " back channel" was ever set up, no attempt was ever made to establish such a back channel.
All that has been leaked is that the topic was discussed. Such a back channel would have been not only legal and proper, it would have been a good idea, if possible.

Have you ever heard of evidence?
Are you even aware of the fact that no evidence exists to support your polically motivated "suspicions".

PeterS wrote:
You really have to be kidding. You do realize that Trump was trying to circumvent US intelligence agencies all together by going through the Russian communication apparatus. You can't sit there and tell me you are okay with that--especially given that he is suspected of colluding with the Russians during the election. Yeah boy, give me some stem cells, I'm the one who needs the brain.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.