One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Tempest in a teapot: Jared's back channels to Russia
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
May 28, 2017 16:08:16   #
EmilyStrode
 
Head of the DHS said this was nothing more than a wise move, and one that should be commended, not investigated. If McMaster is also "unconcerned" about it, end of story.

Correction: Not head of DHS but Secretary John Kelly of DHS says that it is "not an issue." http://time.com/4796868/john-kelly-defends-jared-kushner-russia/

Reply
May 28, 2017 16:34:41   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Head of the DHS said this was nothing more than a wise move, and one that should be commended, not investigated. If McMaster is also "unconcerned" about it, end of story.

Correction: Not head of DHS but Secretary John Kelly of DHS says that it is "not an issue." http://time.com/4796868/john-kelly-defends-jared-kushner-russia/


You think your Hag Hillary was not in contact with russians? They were hacking her NON SECURE servers....HAHAHAHAHAHHOHHOHOHOHEHEHEHEEHELALALALALALALAOLOLLLHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
May 28, 2017 16:35:04   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
Sammre as i
EmilyStrode wrote:
Head of the DHS said this was nothing more than a wise move, and one that should be commended, not investigated. If McMaster is also "unconcerned" about it, end of story.

Correction: Not head of DHS but Secretary John Kelly of DHS says that it is "not an issue." http://time.com/4796868/john-kelly-defends-jared-kushner-russia/


Same as I would have done. Keep spies out of your business as much as is possible

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2017 16:36:58   #
EmilyStrode
 
America Only wrote:
You think your Hag Hillary was not in contact with russians? They were hacking her NON SECURE servers....HAHAHAHAHAHHOHHOHOHOHEHEHEHEEHELALALALALALALAOLOLLLHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who were you talking to?

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:04:29   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
America Only wrote:
You think your Hag Hillary was not in contact with russians? They were hacking her NON SECURE servers....HAHAHAHAHAHHOHHOHOHOHEHEHEHEEHELALALALALALALAOLOLLLHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!






You betcha', AO; and I'd bet dollars to donuts that the Navy SEAL team in the American military helicopter that was fatally shot down just after the ben Laden raid, flying low and fast and {supposedly} undetectable, in an uncharted region, was because of "C" {"whatever THAT means"} unsecured Hillary emails going into the Middle-Eastern war-zones, that were hacked by Islamic terrorists; because an American SEAL team, {in helicopters}, had just wasted their main-man leader!!! Interesting. Like the Benghazi massacre. I'd again bet dollars to donuts that the Benghazi Islamic terrorists knew that Ambassador Stevens was due in Benghazi {at a certain time}, even before the CIA in the American compound knew; and, in their "jihad" manner, carefully arranged a bang-up Islamic terrorist greeting for him!!! And how-about that never rescinded "stand-(D)own" order, over a 13 hour chase and torture, that could ONLY have been given {and/or rescinded}, by the most senior person "in-the-loop." Hummmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER!!!" Now; "(D)RAIN THAT {RADICAL LOONY SECULAR JACKASS LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE "LEFTY"} SWAMP!!!"

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:08:50   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Who could blame Trump's administration for looking for something like this, for they knew they were being surveilled by Obama and his "Deep State", as President Trump said Obama and intelligence agencies were "Wire Tapping" (an outdated description for surveilance in the digital age) him and his campaign and administration, and this has been proven by the "Unmasking Scandal" of our favorite "whore liar" Susan Rice, who Obama uses as a whore for all his lies that he wants the public to hear. They broke no laws, just looked for a way to communicate with Russia, and others, without Obama and his "Deep State" constantly surveiling him and leaking everything, even classified materials, that they were doing or planning to do, to the liberal biased media.

Since this really isn't against the law, and no law has been broken, why are they making a big deal out of it, and not investigating the surveillance of our President, and the leaking of classified materials, which all are against the law to do?

Could it be because Obama's "Deep State" really does exist, and they all are out to get and destroy the President that the people elected, and have been trying to do this when he was first elected and only the President-Elect, and still has done anything wrong when his administration is only 4 months old.



EmilyStrode wrote:
Head of the DHS said this was nothing more than a wise move, and one that should be commended, not investigated. If McMaster is also "unconcerned" about it, end of story.

Correction: Not head of DHS but Secretary John Kelly of DHS says that it is "not an issue." http://time.com/4796868/john-kelly-defends-jared-kushner-russia/

Reply
May 28, 2017 17:21:34   #
EmilyStrode
 
Randy131 wrote:
Who could blame Trump's administration for looking for something like this, for they knew they were being surveilled by Obama and his "Deep State", as President Trump said Obama and intelligence agencies were "Wire Tapping" (an outdated description for surveilance in the digital age) him and his campaign and administration, and this has been proven by the "Unmasking Scandal" of our favorite "whore liar" Susan Rice, who Obama uses as a whore for all his lies that he wants the public to hear. They broke no laws, just looked for a way to communicate with Russia, and others, without Obama and his "Deep State" constantly surveiling him and leaking everything, even classified materials, that they were doing or planning to do, to the liberal biased media.

Since this really isn't against the law, and no law has been broken, why are they making a big deal out of it, and not investigating the surveillance of our President, and the leaking of classified materials, which all are against the law to do?

Could it be because Obama's "Deep State" really does exist, and they all are out to get and destroy the President that the people elected, and have been trying to do this when he was first elected and only the President-Elect, and still has done anything wrong when his administration is only 4 months old.
Who could blame Trump's administration for looking... (show quote)


Wow. Thank you for keeping on point. Huh?

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2017 18:23:32   #
Gatsby
 
Now for the rest of that story.
The information came from intercepted messages between the ambassador and Moscow.

Thanks to our own news media, president Putin was just informed that we have broken their diplomatic codes.

EmilyStrode wrote:
Head of the DHS said this was nothing more than a wise move, and one that should be commended, not investigated. If McMaster is also "unconcerned" about it, end of story.

Correction: Not head of DHS but Secretary John Kelly of DHS says that it is "not an issue." http://time.com/4796868/john-kelly-defends-jared-kushner-russia/

Reply
May 28, 2017 18:27:00   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Really? Huh??? You don't see me defending Jared Kushner and the Trump administration for looking for a "Back Channel" communication system with Russia, so they don't have to use the system that Obama is having his "Deep State" do surveillance of? Did you not know and understand why they were trying to do it, while communicating with the Russians is not illegal? I only showed a motive for why they were even attempting the "Back Channel" communicatons with the Russians, to stop all the surveillance of that communications, which has led to the leaks of classified materials, while the surveillance of our President, and the leaking of classified materials to the liberal media for publication, is against our laws.



EmilyStrode wrote:
Wow. Thank you for keeping on point. Huh?

Reply
May 28, 2017 18:43:26   #
son of witless
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Who were you talking to?


Wow it happened to somebody else. I get that all of the time.

Reply
May 28, 2017 20:00:54   #
EmilyStrode
 
son of witless wrote:
Wow it happened to somebody else. I get that all of the time.


Funny.

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2017 05:46:17   #
CanSEE
 
They are MAKING A BIG DEAL about it to plant the seeds of mistrust, suspicion, keeping the collusion excuse alive etc. This obnoxious24/7 relentless news coverage is aimed at the sheeple (the lefts voting base). We were told outright and directly that ' THEY ' rely on the STUPIDITY of the American People.
Republicans aren't savey enough to create a loop of Kelly saying IT'S A NON ISSUE.

Reply
May 29, 2017 06:15:29   #
PeterS
 
EmilyStrode wrote:
Head of the DHS said this was nothing more than a wise move, and one that should be commended, not investigated. If McMaster is also "unconcerned" about it, end of story.

Correction: Not head of DHS but Secretary John Kelly of DHS says that it is "not an issue." http://time.com/4796868/john-kelly-defends-jared-kushner-russia/


Setting up secure lines hiding from your own national security. Yep that sounds like a good idea to me--don't see why anyone would have any problems with it...

Reply
May 29, 2017 06:16:57   #
PeterS
 
CanSEE wrote:
They are MAKING A BIG DEAL about it to plant the seeds of mistrust, suspicion, keeping the collusion excuse alive etc. This obnoxious24/7 relentless news coverage is aimed at the sheeple (the lefts voting base). We were told outright and directly that ' THEY ' rely on the STUPIDITY of the American People.
Republicans aren't savey enough to create a loop of Kelly saying IT'S A NON ISSUE.


Damn, that is so, so, true...

Reply
May 29, 2017 06:18:46   #
PeterS
 
Randy131 wrote:
Really? Huh??? You don't see me defending Jared Kushner and the Trump administration for looking for a "Back Channel" communication system with Russia, so they don't have to use the system that Obama is having his "Deep State" do surveillance of? Did you not know and understand why they were trying to do it, while communicating with the Russians is not illegal? I only showed a motive for why they were even attempting the "Back Channel" communicatons with the Russians, to stop all the surveillance of that communications, which has led to the leaks of classified materials, while the surveillance of our President, and the leaking of classified materials to the liberal media for publication, is against our laws.
Really? Huh??? You don't see me defending Jared ... (show quote)


Ah, so you thing they want to talk to the Russians without anyone listening in? Makes sense to me, how about you...

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.