Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria? #2 (Page 97): I only am aware of 4.6 billion in claims paid where did you get 7 billion?...

One Political Plaza - Home of politics

Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰

Check out topic: Ukraine Soldiers are Still Fighting Hard for Their Country With Support From NATO

Main

Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria? #2

This topic is locked to prevent further replies.

This discussion was started in a previous topic. You can find it here.

This discussion is continued in a new topic. You can find it here.

<<return to digest

Page <<first <prev 97 of 99 next> last>>

This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.

Jun 8, 2017 18:14:18 #

emarine

eagleye13 wrote:

Only you care about your posts. Why don't you answ... (show quote)

I only am aware of 4.6 billion in claims paid where did you get 7 billion?...

Jun 8, 2017 18:38:36 #

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

emarine wrote:

I only am aware of 4.6 billion in claims paid where did you get 7 billion?...

Larry Silverstein Makes 7 Billion from WTC 9-11 insurance policy
https://youtu.be/qLK0c-pgJBQ

Larry Silverstein lies about 911 - The Luckiest Man Alive! (mirror from nufffrespect)
https://youtu.be/2A9ph-Jz7L4

Larry Silverstein avoids 9/11 questions
https://youtu.be/lGGHPNW-CWs

You want more, emarine?

Jun 8, 2017 20:05:23 #

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

eagleye13 wrote:

You might try a little research on this instead of believing your troother sites, which are wrong. The total was $4.6 billion. There was a trial and the jury ruled this was one event, not 2.

Check out topic: 'Most ruthless' Mexican cartels operate in all 50 states, bring turf wars to US: DEA

Jun 8, 2017 20:56:05 #

Steve700

amadjuster wrote:

Steve,

You need to get laid or something. Exorcism? Do you dream of little girls' heads spinning around spewing green pea soup? Man, get a hold of yourself!

I was very clear in what I said and stand by it.

Get your fingers and your butt plugs out of your orifices and pay attention

Jun 8, 2017 21:07:57 #

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Truth is putz Kinetic energy has brought down more structures than chemical explosives by 100x...

Wrecking balls may have taken down short buildings but not in less than 15 seconds.
That type of non-explosive kinetic energy took days if not weeks to take down small buildings.
Your desperation is mounting . . .

Jun 8, 2017 21:19:20 #

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Very untrue putz... my opinions are formed by many sources & life experience ... I do no agree with some of NISTs findings on the towers collapse & I'm self employed... I don't need to lie here... I'm not selling anything here but you are...

Name one feature of the collapse theory you're attempting to sell which didn't come from NIST or employees of NIST.

If you didn't need to lie on this forum, there would be no reason why you won't identify yourself.
Go to the comment section of this article on another political forum. Notice that everyone who comments there goes by their real names.
https://www.opednews.com/articles/We-Must-Be-Brave-Enough-to-by-Jeremy-Corbyn-Jeremy-Corbyn_War-On-Terror_War-On-Terrorism-170528-200.html#comment660304
Many use their photos as avatars. Tell readers why you can't reveal your identity.

Jun 8, 2017 21:40:55 #

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prwvj-npt5s

Jun 8, 2017 21:50:05 #

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

payne1000 wrote:

The tallest high rise ever taken down through controlled demolition was less than 50 stories. Show us one instance in the 100 year history of skyscrapers that a demolition company used a top down approach and did so by planting explosives AND THERMITE on every floor. To this day such a thing has never been done, the cost in time and money would have been prohibitive even for a of building 20 or 30 stories.

The fact remains that demolition pros rely on the law of gravity to do the heavy work, and only in very rare and unique situations do they ever use thermite to cut steel columns. RDX formed into shaped charges does an excellent job of slicing through steel like a hot knife through butter, and they don't need tons of it. RDX is the professional's "go to" explosive for taking down steel framed buildings, and they don't have to plant it on every freaking floor.

The idea that the twin towers and one other WTC building was rigged with a massive overkill in explosives and thermite is preposterous. It is absolute insanity to believe that actually could have been done.

Jun 8, 2017 21:50:19 #

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

Name one feature of the collapse theory you're att... (show quote)

Who cares what other people do... some people eat moose balls or build retarded sheetrock & concrete experiments on their free time... it's a free country putz

Jun 8, 2017 22:02:27 #

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

Name one feature of the collapse theory you're att... (show quote)

looks like they got your number putz...Reply to Lawrence Klein:
Just so you guys know, this man is trolling here to spread lies...

Jun 8, 2017 22:11:23 #

Steve700

Blade_Runner wrote:

9/11 truthers are a disgrace. You are an insult to human intelligence. How easily deluded you fools are.

Your Disgusting & Despicable Evil Defiant Willful Blindness & Truth Suppression has been put on full display for all to see:
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-104666-1.html

Check out topic: OMG we all heard it

Jun 9, 2017 07:45:19 #

payne1000

emarine wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prwvj-npt5s

You obviously can't tell the difference between concrete low rise buildings and steel-framed skyscrapers.
Steel columns will not collapse under compression even if subjected to long hours of intense fire.

Jun 9, 2017 07:58:02 #

payne1000

Blade_Runner wrote:

The tallest high rise ever taken down through cont... (show quote)

John Skilling, head structural engineer for the twin towers said,

“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much.” He continues, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.” http://anonhq.com/european-scientific-journal-concludes-911-was-a-controlled-demolition/

Jun 9, 2017 08:01:35 #

payne1000

emarine wrote:

Who cares what other people do... some people eat moose balls or build retarded sheetrock & concrete experiments on their free time... it's a free country putz

So you can't name one feature of your collapse theory that did not come from NIST which is controlled by the perpetrators?
Why am I not surprised?

Jun 9, 2017 08:03:35 #

payne1000

emarine wrote:

looks like they got your number putz...Reply to Lawrence Klein:
Just so you guys know, this man is trolling here to spread lies...

Those who troll here to spread lies must hide their identities.
My name is Larry Payne. What's your real name, emarine?

Page <<first <prev 97 of 99 next> last>>

If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.

<<return to digest

Check out topic: The US No Longer Has a Military

Main

Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections

OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum