Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria? #2 (Page 82): :sm24: :sm24: :sm24: :sm24: :sm24: :sm24: Payne is a bad sick joke....what ever his REAL name is...it is not...

This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Blade_Runner wrote:

I'm not admitting anything, you are. As long as you remain a prisoner of an artificial construct in which self-delusion is the driving force, the reason the towers collapsed is beyond your comprehension.

Payne is a bad sick joke....what ever his REAL name is...it is not Larry Payne....hohohehehehehe More like Mohammad Hadid Kaszir.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Now back to the topic of this thread; 'Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria?'

emarine wrote:
"Why would Assad gas his own people????... because he's an ass & has done It before..."

The Covert Origins of ISIS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI&feature=player_detailpage

The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkamZg68jpk

payne1000

emarine wrote:

He only understands the block theory... a 20 floor block cant crush a 90 floor block...

Newton's Third Law backs me up on that. "The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object."
The most the 20 floor block could crush would be 20 floors.

payne1000

America Only wrote:

img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)

Your name should be "Yellow-bellied Coward."
You hide behind cowardly anonymity in order to post your vile insults.
You don't have the guts to insult me using your real name.

payne1000

amadjuster wrote:

Larry, it's almost sundown so you can eat again.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

payne1000 wrote:

Your name should be "Yellow-bellied Coward."
You hide behind cowardly anonymity in order to post your vile insults.
You don't have the guts to insult me using your real name.

Now back to the topic of this thread; 'Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria?'

emarine wrote:
"Why would Assad gas his own people????... because he's an ass & has done It before..."

The Covert Origins of ISIS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI&feature=player_detailpage

The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkamZg68jpk

payne1000

emarine wrote:

No you just don't know how the laws of motion apply... you really blew any credibility as far as logic & reason goes with your sheetrock rant... your sheetrock wall failed like a soda can under the impact of a sledge hammer.... same as the individual floors under the impact zone... apply the 2nd law of motion to each floor one @ a time... not the 3rd law 20 floors @ a time... you will see a much different result...

When Newton's third law of motion is applied to the theory that gravity crushed one floor at a time, then there would be an equal and opposite reaction on each floor as the towers came down.
This would mean there would be a jolt or pause in the collapse 90 times on the North Tower as it came down. Watch the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGAofwkAOlo
There is not one equal and opposite reaction in the fall. That indicates explosives removed all the resistance in the lower section. The massive explosive debris clouds also prove explosives were used.
Your theory says the floor slabs fell disconnected from the dense steel outer wall structure and the massive steel center core. You are saying the floor slabs pancaked onto one another in a straight downward motion. The videos show the entire top section of 20 floors coming down as one unit. This would require that all 240 outer wall columns and all 47 massive center core columns be cut at the same time. You haven't explained how this can happen without cutting charges and explosives.

payne1000

Blade_Runner wrote:

I don't think he even understands that. payne seem... (show quote)

Readers should note that all those who are attempting to cover up the truth on this forum hide behind cowardly anonymity.
They'd rather be recognized as cowards than to reveal their identities.
They are afraid to post their lies defending mass murderers under their real names.

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

When Newton's third law of motion is applied to th... (show quote)

The main problem here putz is the magnitude of your ignorance & nothing more...

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Now back to the topic of this thread; 'Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria?'

emarine wrote:
"Why would Assad gas his own people????... because he's an ass & has done It before..."

The Covert Origins of ISIS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI&feature=player_detailpage

The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkamZg68jpk

emarine wrote:

The main problem here putz is the magnitude of your ignorance & nothing more...

payne1000

emarine wrote:

The main problem here putz is the magnitude of your ignorance & nothing more...

The main problem readers should have with your reply is that you have no rebuttal for the lack of equal and opposite reaction when the top section hits the solid and undamaged floors below.
You claim individual floors broke loose and fell on the floors below but the videos show the entire top section falling as one unit and quickly disintegrating without causing any equal and opposite reaction. The magnitude of your intention to deceive is what's on display here.

emarine

payne1000 wrote:

The main problem readers should have with your reply is that you have no rebuttal for the lack of equal and opposite reaction when the top section hits the solid and undamaged floors below.
You claim individual floors broke loose and fell on the floors below but the videos show the entire top section falling as one unit and quickly disintegrating without causing any equal and opposite reaction. The magnitude of your intention to deceive is what's on display here.

maybe you want to explain how the 20 top floors hit the next 20 floors all at the same time ...What we witnessed on 911 was F=m*a the 2nd law of motion... the mass accelerated with distance gaining speed not decelerated losing speed... as each floor failed it added to the mass not subtracted... This guy designed the building you fool with Photoshop posting deceptive photos & say foolish things concerning sheetrock ... you have no credibility even though we know your name.... this guy is credible...

Jon D. Magnusson, chairman-CEO of Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire Inc., Seattle, structural engineer for the original World Trade Center, agrees: "From what I observed on TV, it appeared that the floor diaphragm, necessary to brace the exterior columns, had lost connection to the exterior wall."

When the stability was lost, the exterior columns buckled outward, allowing the floors above to drop down onto floors below, overloading and failing each one as it went down,

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

payne1000 wrote:

The main problem readers should have with your reply is that you have no rebuttal for the lack of equal and opposite reaction when the top section hits the solid and undamaged floors below.
You claim individual floors broke loose and fell on the floors below but the videos show the entire top section falling as one unit and quickly disintegrating without causing any equal and opposite reaction. The magnitude of your intention to deceive is what's on display here.

payne1000 @ When Newton's third law of motion is applied to the theory that gravity crushed one floor at a time, then there would be an equal and opposite reaction on each floor as the towers came down.
This would mean there would be a jolt or pause in the collapse 90 times on the North Tower as it came down. There is not one equal and opposite reaction in the fall.

You haven't explained how this can happen without cutting charges and explosives.
I'm getting tired of this infantile horseshit, but what the hell, one more time:

Gravity IS NOT a theory.
Gravity is one of the Four Fundamental Forces in the Universe. Gravity is why one WTC tower weighed 500,000 tons.
Gravity did not crush the tower.
Gravity is the force that pulled the MASS of the tower down.
Under the pull of Gravity, the MASS OF THE TOWER crushed the entire building.

If you want to go with 20 floors, we'll go with 20 floors.

The MASS of each individual floor system (slabs, trusses, and office contents) weighed an average of 4500 tons.

The MASS of the 20 floors above the BIG WOUND weighed 90,000 tons. (4500 tons x 20 = 90,000)

Each individual floor system supported its own weight plus whatever was placed upon it.

The vertical support system--core and perimeter columns--held each individual floor system in place. We can deduce from this that each individual floor system was bearing DOWN on the vertical support system. We can further deduce that the strength and support of each individual floor system did not depend on any other floor system, above or below it.

Due to the force of Gravity acting upon it, the natural tendency of each individual floor system was to FALL DOWN. (That's why buildings generally have a vertical load bearing system. You know, to hold up the floors and keep them from FALLING DOWN.)

The floor system would FALL DOWN if its connections to the vertical support system were broken. This is, IN FACT, what happened in the devastated area of tower EVEN BEFORE IT BEGAN TO COLLAPSE.

Now, when the 90,000 ton MASS of the 20 floors above the BIG WOUND began to collapse, it came down first on the floor system immediately below it. When this 90,000 tons of MASS IN MOTION collided with the 4500 ton MASS AT REST, an EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION occurred. Yes, it did. This is a scientific fact. Newton's 3rd Law.

However, since the collapsing mass was 20 times more MASSIVE than the floor system it collided with, Newton's 2nd Law came into play. The acceleration of an object is dependent upon both FORCE AND MASS. The acceleration and mass of the collapsing portion of the tower far exceeded the static mass of the floor system.

The floor system first in the path of the collapsing upper MASS was already straining against its connections to its vertical support, so when it was hit by that collapsing mass and its connections to the vertical support were broken, it had no choice but to join the big guy in his mad, crushing rush to the ground. The little fellow actually added his weight to the charge downward.

And as the collapse progressed, both the acceleration and the mass increased. One floor system after another joined the onrush. Once the Big Fellow up top started DOWN, the tower didn't have a chance.

emarine

Blade_Runner wrote:

payne1000 @ When Newton's third law of motion is applied to the theory that gravity crushed one floor at a time, then there would be an equal and opposite reaction on each floor as the towers came down.
This would mean there would be a jolt or pause in the collapse 90 times on the North Tower as it came down. There is not one equal and opposite reaction in the fall.

You haven't explained how this can happen without cutting charges and explosives.
I'm getting tired of this infantile horseshit, but what the hell, one more time:

Gravity IS NOT a theory.
Gravity is one of the Four Fundamental Forces in the Universe. Gravity is why one WTC tower weighed 500,000 tons.
Gravity did not crush the tower.
Gravity is the force that pulled the MASS of the tower down.
Under the pull of Gravity, the MASS OF THE TOWER crushed the entire building.

If you want to go with 20 floors, we'll go with 20 floors.

The MASS of each individual floor system (slabs, trusses, and office contents) weighed an average of 4500 tons.

The MASS of the 20 floors above the BIG WOUND weighed 90,000 tons. (4500 tons x 20 = 90,000)

Each individual floor system supported its own weight plus whatever was placed upon it.

The vertical support system--core and perimeter columns--held each individual floor system in place. We can deduce from this that each individual floor system was bearing DOWN on the vertical support system. We can further deduce that the strength and support of each individual floor system did not depend on any other floor system, above or below it.

Due to the force of Gravity acting upon it, the natural tendency of each individual floor system was to FALL DOWN. (That's why buildings generally have a vertical load bearing system. You know, to hold up the floors and keep them from FALLING DOWN.)

The floor system would FALL DOWN if its connections to the vertical support system were broken. This is, IN FACT, what happened in the devastated area of tower EVEN BEFORE IT BEGAN TO COLLAPSE.

Now, when the 90,000 ton MASS of the 20 floors above the BIG WOUND began to collapse, it came down first on the floor system immediately below it. When this 90,000 tons of MASS IN MOTION collided with the 4500 ton MASS AT REST, an EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION occurred. Yes, it did. This is a scientific fact. Newton's 3rd Law.

However, since the collapsing mass was 20 times more MASSIVE than the floor system it collided with, Newton's 2nd Law came into play. The acceleration of an object is dependent upon both FORCE AND MASS. The acceleration and mass of the collapsing portion of the tower far exceeded the static mass of the floor system.

The floor system first in the path of the collapsing upper MASS was already straining against its connections to its vertical support, so when it was hit by that collapsing mass and its connections to the vertical support were broken, it had no choice but to join the big guy in his mad, crushing rush to the ground. The little fellow actually added his weight to the charge downward.

And as the collapse progressed, both the acceleration and the mass increased. One floor system after another joined the onrush. Once the Big Fellow up top started DOWN, the tower didn't have a chance.

payne1000 @ When Newton's third law of motion is a... (show quote)

That is of course except for the interior sheetrock stopping the 90,000 ton mass in its tracks...

... there's always one in every blog...

Steve700

Blade_Runner wrote:

payne1000 @ When Newton's third law of motion is applied to the theory that gravity crushed one floor at a time, then there would be an equal and opposite reaction on each floor as the towers came down.
This would mean there would be a jolt or pause in the collapse 90 times on the North Tower as it came down. There is not one equal and opposite reaction in the fall.

You haven't explained how this can happen without cutting charges and explosives.
I'm getting tired of this infantile horseshit, but what the hell, one more time:

Gravity IS NOT a theory.
Gravity is one of the Four Fundamental Forces in the Universe. Gravity is why one WTC tower weighed 500,000 tons.
Gravity did not crush the tower.
Gravity is the force that pulled the MASS of the tower down.
.
Under the pull of Gravity, the MASS OF THE TOWER crushed the entire building.

If you want to go with 20 floors, we'll go with 20 floors.

The MASS of each individual floor system (slabs, trusses, and office contents) weighed an average of 4500 tons.

The MASS of the 20 floors above the BIG WOUND weighed 90,000 tons. (4500 tons x 20 = 90,000)

Each individual floor system supported its own weight plus whatever was placed upon it.

The vertical support system--core and perimeter columns--held each individual floor system in place. We can deduce from this that each individual floor system was bearing DOWN on the vertical support system. We can further deduce that the strength and support of each individual floor system did not depend on any other floor system, above or below it.

Due to the force of Gravity acting upon it, the natural tendency of each individual floor system was to FALL DOWN. (That's why buildings generally have a vertical load bearing system. You know, to hold up the floors and keep them from FALLING DOWN.)

The floor system would FALL DOWN if its connections to the vertical support system were broken. This is, IN FACT, what happened in the devastated area of tower EVEN BEFORE IT BEGAN TO COLLAPSE.

Now, when the 90,000 ton MASS of the 20 floors above the BIG WOUND began to collapse, it came down first on the floor system immediately below it. When this 90,000 tons of MASS IN MOTION collided with the 4500 ton MASS AT REST, an EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION occurred. Yes, it did. This is a scientific fact. Newton's 3rd Law.

However, since the collapsing mass was 20 times more MASSIVE than the floor system it collided with, Newton's 2nd Law came into play. The acceleration of an object is dependent upon both FORCE AND MASS. The acceleration and mass of the collapsing portion of the tower far exceeded the static mass of the floor system.

The floor system first in the path of the collapsing upper MASS was already straining against its connections to its vertical support, so when it was hit by that collapsing mass and its connections to the vertical support were broken, it had no choice but to join the big guy in his mad, crushing rush to the ground. The little fellow actually added his weight to the charge downward.

And as the collapse progressed, both the acceleration and the mass increased. One floor system after another joined the onrush. Once the Big Fellow up top started DOWN, the tower didn't have a chance.

payne1000 @ When Newton's third law of motion is a... (show quote)

You say you are getting tired of this bull shit, but obviously you are not. There is something wrong with you going on and on and on and on at nausea with the same little aspect of 9/11 being an inside job. Give it up. You lost the argument 100 pages ago with your absolute refusal to look at the evidence presented to you and your failure to answer questions that you were asked. (And I dismantled your responses to the couple that you did)
.

You win the award for drinking the Kool-Aid, this time for drinking the most government Kool-Aid. An award usually given to the libtards