You, in my opinion, are spot on. I can not pretend to understand what makes them tick....
Loki wrote:
Eugene Debs, in typical Liberal fashion, calls you an idiot, yet he suggests "massive electoral college fraud" a far less likely scenario, as a possible cause of Trump's victory. Like most self-righteous Liberal lemmings, Debs must think that occupying a moral high ground (that exists only in Liberal imaginations) will somehow camouflage the occupier's ignorance, and disconnect with reality.
Eugene Debs wrote:
Before the first week was over on demanding his impeachment was a delayed reaction from the sane and decent people in America. They were is shock that such a total piece of crap somehow was now president. (Perhaps by massive electoral college fraud?) The polls on Hillary were not wrong; she won the popular vote within the major of error. Sorry, I stray. My favorite sign at his inauguration was "Why is impeachment taking so long?" The man is total slime and an utter disgrace to America. Who cares if they wanted to impeach him even before he was president: prescience is not a crime.
Before the first week was over on demanding his im... (
show quote)
Her "margin" of victory was in four counties out of 3500. Two of them are in California. Does that suggest anything to you?
PeterS wrote:
You mean talk of collusion with our greatest foe and the MSM dared to talk of impeachment? Those unpatriotic bastards--everyone knows colluding with the Russians is the most patriotic thing a person could possible do. Hell, look how Trump fired Comey in order to reduce the heat he felt from the Russia investigation and the very next day he invited the Russians into the Oval where he gave proudly away secrets and let the Russian press in all while keeping the American press out. Hell, how much more patriotic can a person get!!!
You mean talk of collusion with our greatest foe a... (
show quote)
Kinda like giving 20 per cent of our uranium to Russia?
rebob14 wrote:
Kinda like giving 20 per cent of our uranium to Russia?
Petey boy keeps talking about "collusion with Russia." I think he believes that if he says it enough it will somehow become true. Maybe if he clicked his heels together three times when he said it?
Pennylynn wrote:
You, in my opinion, are spot on. I can not pretend to understand what makes them tick....
Are you sure you didn't mean TICKS? As in parasites?
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
Eugene Debs wrote:
Before the first week was over on demanding his impeachment was a delayed reaction from the sane and decent people in America. They were is shock that such a total piece of crap somehow was now president. (Perhaps by massive electoral college fraud?) The polls on Hillary were not wrong; she won the popular vote within the major of error. Sorry, I stray. My favorite sign at his inauguration was "Why is impeachment taking so long?" The man is total slime and an utter disgrace to America. Who cares if they wanted to impeach him even before he was president: prescience is not a crime.
Before the first week was over on demanding his im... (
show quote)
Eugene V. Debs, is that you reincarnated in your old personage? Hey Gene, when I see that name my first though is here is the worst of our socialists of all times. Is that really you or are you an left leaner just using that name so other lefties can know what you are.
Do you know what impeachment is and how it is done? I think not but maybe you can explain the whole thing to me so I can know what you think it is. Maybe you can Google the word and learn a little something.
You are right about those of us who voted for Trump. We will do it again if he wants to be mistreated by the media like he has up to now. You did look at some of the 50 things I suggested out of 15,000 and, of course, you looked at the dates of at least some of them. You didn't win a lot in your earlier life and are losing now. Maybe you need to go to a wildly liberal site and play your games.
I forgot to suggest that you could learn a lot about impeachment if you open the link I provided and it comes right out there, from a left leaning source.
Eugene Debs wrote:
I admire your restraint.
The Constitution says that you have to be a certain age, a citizen and born on American soil. This criteria can afford just about any American the opportunity to be President. How quickly we forget the standards of the Constitution vs those we makeup in our own minds. With respect to the Supreme Court, everybody thinks you have to graduate from Harvard Law School to be a Justice. According to the Constitution you don't enem need a law degree to sit on the High Court. If we got back to the standards of The Constitution and appointed righteous men and women, our nation would not be so messed up. Food for thought.
The only collusion that has actually come out with evidence is the DNC working along side the media, MAJOR donors, and the DNC's own Electoral college and their commitment to vote for Hillary long before the election ever started, even the DNC lawyer telling a Judge they are not beholden to the voters of the party and they get to decide who becomes their candidate--nothing but innuendo of Trump campaign and Russia.
Which is rather interesting given this isn't the First time the DNC have had a lawsuit filed by Democrats in Florida, for their shenanigans--so yes, if they have paid attention to politics they SHOULD have known this is what goes on inside the party.
This was back in 2007,
https://www.billnelson.senate.gov/newsroom/news/florida-democrats-to-sue-dnc-on-primaryAnd now again in 2016
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/did-dnc-help-hillary-clinton-034002774.htmlhttp://progressivearmy.com/2017/05/05/the-young-turks-fall-on-their-face-covering-dnc-fraud-lawsuit/In essence, Spiva argued what previous DNC attorneys have argued, which is that there is no enforceable obligation for the DNC to run impartial and fair primary elections, and that Sanders supporters should have assumed as much. For most who read the transcripts, this was an enormous gaffe, it was the DNC admitting that they never intended to run a fair primary election, and in their opinion, they didn’t have to. They could coerce, manipulate, lie, and do whatever it took to ensure their choice would be nominated, voters be damned. "
It all makes for cannon fodder when they try and claim the "RNC hand picks their candidate, republican voters be damned" because well, if the RNC actually DID hand pick their candidate despite the voting bases wishes, well Donald Trump wouldn't be president right now. And these are the same one's who were also screaming for Trump to be impeached, and they would rather have Hillary than Him..even if it meant tossing in their insider Evan McMillian as an alternative
When were the first calls to impeach Trump?? How about way back in July of 2016, before the election ever took place?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-keppler/impeachment-likely-for-a-_b_11023350.htmlWe could go back even further to April 2016 where someone else mentioned it..so how long has that drum been beating??
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/donald-trump-2016-impeachment-213817
Loki wrote:
Petey boy keeps talking about "collusion with Russia." I think he believes that if he says it enough it will somehow become true. Maybe if he clicked his heels together three times when he said it?
Maybe he would go back to the Funny Farm where he came from as a mental patient. They say Liberalism is a mental disease.
PeterS wrote:
To be fair, I thought the impeachment process should start the day he was elected simply because he was so unqualified to be president.
Looks like he's doing OK to me. I don't think you're qualified to decide who is qualified and I seriously doubt your thought process goes much further than whatever emotion you happen to be feeling at a given time.
BigMike wrote:
Looks like he's doing OK to me. I don't think you're qualified to decide who is qualified and I seriously doubt your thought process goes much further than whatever emotion you happen to be feeling at a given time.
Do me a favor? Get a copy of the U. S. Constitution and see what the requirements are to be President. How in the hell can you sit there and say he is not qualified is beyond me. Think Man! Think!
Loki wrote:
Petey boy keeps talking about "collusion with Russia." I think he believes that if he says it enough it will somehow become true. Maybe if he clicked his heels together three times when he said it?
LOKI,
I think you said you use to be a history teacher. What are the requirements, written in the U. S. Constitution, that it takes to be President of the United States. If I am not mistaken, you do not even have to have a law degree to be appointed to the Supreme Court. If I am wrong, please tan my ass and put me in my place. I am tired of people saying that Trump is not qualified to be President. That decision is made by the American People when a candidate seeks office.
samtheyank wrote:
Do me a favor? Get a copy of the U. S. Constitution and see what the requirements are to be President. How in the hell can you sit there and say he is not qualified is beyond me. Think Man! Think!
I "think" you meant that for the person I was replying to. The idea that Trump isn't qualified or that Pete could make that call is ludicrous.
samtheyank wrote:
LOKI,
I think you said you use to be a history teacher. What are the requirements, written in the U. S. Constitution, that it takes to be President of the United States. If I am not mistaken, you do not even have to have a law degree to be appointed to the Supreme Court. If I am wrong, please tan my ass and put me in my place. I am tired of people saying that Trump is not qualified to be President. That decision is made by the American People when a candidate seeks office.
oldroy used to be a history teacher, I believe. I was at one time a history major, until I took a realistic look at the employment prospects.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.