oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I think there is a ton of information on the internet that it all started before his inauguration or, at least, before the first week was over. If you don't believe this maybe you should look at this site where they say they found about 15,000 mentions on Google. They explain how to do it but they only list 50 of the 15,000. Like they say you could read all 15,000 if you wanted to. I read only a few of these 50 suggestions and I do remember all of them about inauguration time.

http://constitution.com/media-began-calling-trump-impeachment-3-days-inauguration/

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

If memory serves me, around 21 Nov 2016 a professor of History... NY?? I believe made 2 predictions... first President Trump would win the WH, but he also suggested that some would call for impeachment before he (Trump) could complete 6 months. His reason, Trump colored outside of the lines and Congress would prefer a more "controllable" individual such as Mike Pence is perceived. If memory is correct he used words like: down the pipe, controllable, standard issued, Christian-conservative as adjectives for our Vice President. I wish I could remember the professor's name.... sorry. I will see if I can find the article again. It was on a very low profile opinion page.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Found it. I did say it was not mainstream media..... https://www.nyunews.com/2016/11/21/professor-predicts-impeachment-for-donald-trump/

Eugene Debs

Before the first week was over on demanding his impeachment was a delayed reaction from the sane and decent people in America. They were is shock that such a total piece of crap somehow was now president. (Perhaps by massive electoral college fraud?) The polls on Hillary were not wrong; she won the popular vote within the major of error. Sorry, I stray. My favorite sign at his inauguration was "Why is impeachment taking so long?" The man is total slime and an utter disgrace to America. Who cares if they wanted to impeach him even before he was president: prescience is not a crime.

PeterS

You mean talk of collusion with our greatest foe and the MSM dared to talk of impeachment? Those unpatriotic bastards--everyone knows colluding with the Russians is the most patriotic thing a person could possible do. Hell, look how Trump fired Comey in order to reduce the heat he felt from the Russia investigation and the very next day he invited the Russians into the Oval where he gave proudly away secrets and let the Russian press in all while keeping the American press out. Hell, how much more patriotic can a person get!!!

PeterS

To be fair, I thought the impeachment process should start the day he was elected simply because he was so unqualified to be president.

PeterS

Gosh, both his predictions are true--he must be a clairvoyant...

Eugene Debs

I admire your restraint.

Eugene Debs

Golligeewillikers, people knew he was dangerous and stupid before the election? That he was totally unfit to be president and a disgusting ass? Shocking!

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I think there will be an investigation into voter issues, to include voter fraud. I personally think that there was fraud, not only in this election but the two that proceeded this one. My recommendation, do not jump too quickly on bandwagons. And do not be so inflexible to ignore facts. If there is an investigation and you are proven right, I will be the first to congratulate you on your farsightedness... but, should you be wrong, will you retract or even regret your hasty remarks?

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I doubt it, if you followed the link and actually exercised your reading skill, you would have learned that his "prediction" on the election was done by a computer program. The impeachment issue, well again had you been able to read the article he admitted that it was a "personal opinion" due to the lack of data.... only two presidents have ever been impeached and that is not enough raw data. While on the subject of impeachment... are you aware that the Democrats in DC are walking back their rhetoric on even trying to impeach our President? NPR and NYT ran articles this past week on this subject. Looks like you may have to just accept that your party lost the election and not a darn thing is going to be attempted to change that fact. But, I do admire your stubborn support of your party.

Eugene Debs

You are an idiot, lol. "Massive voter fraud" to the tune of between 3 and 5 million? Investigations by the Left and Right produced negligible instances of voter fraud. If voter fraud was in fact real that heavily favored Democrats, do you think that the GOP would keep it secret? For over three decades Republicans have been claiming voter fraud and instituting repressive voter guidelines without ever finding any indication of "massive voter fraud." Who would be more invested than Republicans in uncovering, for over thirty years, Democrats instigating fraud: and they found nothing. Are you thinking straight or by the tangled web of ideology?

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

You call me an idiot... okay, think as you need. However, I did not say there was "massive voter fraud", do go back and read my comments again. I said I believe there was voter fraud and not just in this election. Is it possible that some of the 235,248,000 people who were in the correct age bracket for voting may not have been US citizens? Try to keep an open mind, of the illegal population in the US, some 80 percent are between 18 and 60. Is it possible that they voted? One very conservative estimate gives the "undocumented" or more accurate those breaking the law by illegally crossing the border without visa, passports, or have overstayed their visa is 12 million... but, to be honest, that is a low ball estimate. By just dismissing that they did not vote is ill-advised. Keeping in mind, that California, New York, and Virginia either are or have considered changing their policies to allow illegals to vote in state elections. What is to say that those who voted for state issues did not get confused and vote for in the national election?

We can not change the past only the present and make plans for tomorrow. I think that an in-depth investigation needs to be done now, clearer guidelines and training need to be instituted to prevent fraud in the future coupled with a voter identification program.

Incidentally, personal insults do not harm me and I will not respond in kind. I prefer honest discussions with people who are capable of divorcing their emotions from facts. I do hope that you and I will be able to converse, debate, and disagree without diminishing our points of view with personal attacks and insults.

Loki Loc: Georgia

It's nice to know that Liberals are still sore losers who act like spoiled children when they don't get their way. The knowledge that some things never change gives one a secure feeling.
"Massive electoral college fraud?" Let's see, out of 3142 counties in the US, Hillary the Harridan won 459. Yep, 86% of all the counties is pretty massive. If you recall the Brouhaha about the voter recounts, you will remember that they were dropped because they showed, in every instance, Trump increasing his lead over Hillary. Not enough to matter, but not what you Liberal Hobbit Dancers expected either.
There are 435 Congressional Districts in the US, each with a population of around 710,000 or so. It's pretty difficult to pull off that much fraud, especially when most of the proven cases involve Democrats.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Eugene Debs, in typical Liberal fashion, calls you an idiot, yet he suggests "massive electoral college fraud" a far less likely scenario, as a possible cause of Trump's victory. Like most self-righteous Liberal lemmings, Debs must think that occupying a moral high ground (that exists only in Liberal imaginations) will somehow camouflage the occupier's ignorance, and disconnect with reality.