Never try to argue facts with a liberal...
tdsrnest wrote:
NOT SURE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT BUT TELL ME WHY A LBGT, FEMINIST, UNIONS WOULD NOT COME OUT AGAINST THE RIGHT WING THEY HATE EVERYTHING THEY STAND FOR. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT WHEN YOU ANARCHIST DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT MEANS AND GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
I don't have to explain a damn thing to you
padremike wrote:
I agree with one caveat, the leftist are the most insidious enemy we, as nation, have ever faced because they murder the souls of their converts and their converts are pouring out of their propaganda training centers, our schools and universities. The Leftists concept of tolerance IS NOT a virtue.
How can you say such a thing. You have control of the house, the Senate, the presidency, and majority of governors and you bitching about the leftist why don't you try to post on anything positive or anything that the right is doing for the poor or middle class. Just give me one.
padremike wrote:
We need a Kent State at Berkley to begin with and, to use a Progressive term, move forward from there. That may seem a little bit extreme but in a war use superior force.
We almost did Ca. Governor Ronald Reagan launched his political career in 1966 by targeting UC Berkeley's student peace activists, professors, and, to a great extent, the University of California itself. In his successful campaign for governor of California, his first elective office, he attacked the Berkeley campus, cementing what would remain a turbulent relationship between Reagan and California's leading institution for public higher education. This was not a happy relationship between the governor and the university — you have to acknowledge it," recalled Neil Smelser, who was a Berkeley professor of sociology during the Reagan years. "As a matter of Reagan's honest convictions but also as a matter of politics, Reagan launched an assault on the university."
As the Vietnam War expanded and the death toll climbed, students at Berkeley launched a determined and, at times, confrontational attempt to stop the war with demonstrations and protests that eventually spread to college campuses across the country. Years later, much of the public came to agree with the students but in 1966, those opposed to the war were a distinct minority in America. Candidate Reagan capitalized on this.
Docadhoc wrote:
Case proven.
Proved What that you are out of touch
working class stiff wrote:
I agree with your post, except for one thing. Under Obama he helped to increase racism with his actions.
vettelover wrote:
I don't have to explain a damn thing to you
That's because you have no explanation for what this freak is doing. You bitched moaned about executive orders and this freak has signed 35?in two months and none of them mean anything. WTF is wrong with you people
tdsrnest wrote:
How can you say such a thing. You have control of the house, the Senate, the presidency, and majority of governors and you bitching about the leftist why don't you try to post on anything positive or anything that the right is doing for the poor or middle class. Just give me one.
They say those things because they are unused to governing. All they've done for the past three decades is bitch, moan, obstruct, and blame the other guy.
Now, faced with responsibility, they are at sea, in uncharted waters, and blaming their inability on...on the other guy. The left that is no longer in power still holds them in thrall emotionally. It's one of the reasons that Clinton and Obama still dominate the pages of OPP.
tdsrnest wrote:
Proved What that you are out of touch
TD, whether you think or say that anyone including myself is current or "in touch" has nothing to do with your foul mouth, lack of class, and lack of character.
You sell yourself here on a daily basis to try to set yourself up as knowledgeable and informed. You either have no hesitation to make a fool of yourself to try to gain a point, or you are a fool 24/7.
The fact that you have been caught lying here repetitively and that you spew absolute nonsense that few here if any ever back up as credible, says everything about you.
Your comments, accusations, and smart mouth have labeled you and you will not live long enough to ever dig out of the hole your mouth has placed you in.
You have become nothing more than a troll seeking attention and coming from you, the more you repeat your ridiculous comments, the less weight they carry. At this point few read anything you post. You love to butt in but block those you butt in on so they cannot comment on any thread you begin. That adds coward to your resume.
You are a waste of time. You may continue your half wit games now. History here in the archives clearly show that even other liberals stay away from you because you soil everything and everyone you touch and frankly no one here needs or wants to be associated in any way with the raving lunatic you are.
working class stiff wrote:
They say those things because they are unused to governing. All they've done for the past three decades is bitch, moan, obstruct, and blame the other guy.
Now, faced with responsibility, they are at sea, in uncharted waters, and blaming their inability on...on the other guy. The left that is no longer in power still holds them in thrall emotionally. It's one of the reasons that Clinton and Obama still dominate the pages of OPP.
And they will continue to be discussed until they are brought to justice. You would love to see us ignore them and take the heat and spotlight off them. Keep waiting.
tdsrnest wrote:
That's because you have no explanation for what this freak is doing. You bitched moaned about executive orders and this freak has signed 35?in two months and none of them mean anything. WTF is wrong with you people
How can you say, with a straight face, that none of them mean anything. He has gotten rid of many of Obama's EO's that were against the common interests of the American people and created some of his own.
Louie27 wrote:
How can you say, with a straight face, that none of them mean anything. He has gotten rid of many of Obama's EO's that were against the common interests of the American people and created some of his own.
If TD thinks negating Obama's EOs is nothing, then he had no respect for Obama's EOs to begin with. That's more than a bit contrary to his BHO worship.
TD is forced to live with a serious disability in that all he has to work with is his own mind. As we all know, TD has been severely cheated in the smarts dept.
working class stiff wrote:
They say those things because they are unused to governing. All they've done for the past three decades is bitch, moan, obstruct, and blame the other guy.
Now, faced with responsibility, they are at sea, in uncharted waters, and blaming their inability on...on the other guy. The left that is no longer in power still holds them in thrall emotionally. It's one of the reasons that Clinton and Obama still dominate the pages of OPP.
I haven't a clue as to WTF you're talking about
padremike wrote:
We need a Kent State at Berkley to begin with and, to use a Progressive term, move forward from there. That may seem a little bit extreme but in a war use superior force.
Kent State was a tragic fiasco where National Guards used their guns when they shouldn't have... But as tragic as it was, it didn't resolve anything... It polarized my generation, and allowed DemLib-Socialism to influence half of my generation's conscience towards Socialism... A System that has never worked because human nature doesn't act that way...
When you say Kent State should be repeated at Berkley, you're showing you're naive... Today there is a chasm already in place... Provoking police or military force will, at worst, only result in death without accomplishing any movement towards Socialim, and at best will be just another meaningless campus rally...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.