Obama wants to get rid of the last NO PC zone. The drive by's tow the Obama line and are Kow towed by the PC N**i's. The only PC free zone is the Internet, and now they are closing in on that. The main source of t***h about Islam is the Internet. Public media is hindered or refuse to report the t***h. I can see the Muslim motivation of Obama behind this. With the Internet firmly in the hands of the PC tyrants, the Islamist will be free to spew lies about Islam being a religion of peace, while a look around the world and the fact that 95% of all conflicts involve Muslims against another group says otherwise.

Not presumptions, cold fact. Just as the fact that 95% of all conflicts in the world involve Muslims. Muslims against some other group such as Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists, etc. Heck Muslims against Muslims. They like k*****g each other almost as much as they like k*****g others. A religion of peace it is not.

I was right. Any Christian would have responded in exactly the same way I did, but of course you wouldn't know that. For that matter a Hindu or Buddhist would probably reply the same also. Only a Muslim would have responded differently.

But there you are wrong. I don't know who you are or if you are religious or not, but ALL the Christians, I know would treat them with kindness and at worst engage in discussion of the merits of both religions, as long as they were orderly and non-violent. We definitely would not stone them or assault them. You are obviously not a Christian or you would know this. Did you think Christians of today behave like we were still in the days of Inquisition? And in answer to your question, this is the United States of America, the first amendment guaranteed these individuals the right to speak their mind, on public property which they had every right to just as a Muslim who spoke or passed out literature on public property during a Christian festival would have had in these united states.

I agree. I believe it was Benjamin Franklin who said those who would sacrifice freedoms for the sake of security deserve neither. But, this country needs to dump the PC bs and stop cow towing to every minority. No one even blinks an eye if Christianity is mocked, but do the same to Islam in a public venue and the PC police are after your hide. There are no exceptions exceptions, as the Islamic percentage of a population grows, so does the Islamic terror and domination of other religions around it. So if we are going to stand by the constitution, we also need to stand the rule of law, and not sharia law either. Slap down all who violate the law and leave no quarter for religious excuses. This is what Muslims depend on, quilting the majority in a PC country to allow them more and more "exceptions" to the rule of law until before you know it, they become a threat to everyone's freedom.

Any opportunities to end the Islamic threat has already been lost. The PC liberals have seen to that. Eventually they will realize the error of their ways but I fear by then the only way to neutralize that threat will be all out war. This of course will not be with Obama at the helm, he would never allow "real" attacks on his people. So one way or another he will either be impeached, or past the end of his term. Ending Muslim atrocities and pushing the Islamic genie back in the bottle will most surely begin world war 3. At that point there will again be only one kind of American, just like it was right after word war 2 and for a few days after 911. Then and only then will America be spiritually strong enough to save itself and the rest of the world.

1. Get real.
2. We are talking about individuals with the Tea Party ideology, not Barrack Obama
3.The republican party would be irrelevant in this case as this would just choose which candidate would run, it's not like they could stop him from filing. It might be a shock to you being a liberal and all, but any citizen who is qualified (citizenship wise) can run. But then Barrack Obama proved you don't have to be and still run.
4. The expense of a full on primary type e******n wouldn't make sense, but wh**ever the vehicle would be, a convention, a caucus, a barbecue, wh**ever method human beings use to meet and come to a decision choose one.
5. And 5, this ain't about the primary process this is about not dividing the tea party v**e 10 ways in the primary, leaving the old boy Republican to win with 20% of the v**e. 1 tea party candidate in the primary with the support of all tea party v**ers.

Coming up, if the Tea Party does not take steps, old boy republicans will steal the e******n away from the tea party again. I Propose to avoid that, the Tea Party conduct an e******n of their own, to choose who finally gets to run in the Republican Primary. I am afraid that if too many Tea Party Candidates throw their hat in the ring, they will all cancel each other out. Their numbers would all be divided among, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Tray Gordy, Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, etc, supporters. Which old school Repubs are so sk**led at using to their advantage. If we had our own primary purely for tea party candidates, we could decide on one candidate to support and the supporter numbers would not be diluted, there by increasing the Tea Party Candidates chances of winning.

What is amusing is how liberals tout the supposed ignorance of Sarah Palin but in doing so, time and time again demonstrate just how stupid and lowbrow they actually are. They rant and rave about supposed r****t and inaccurate statements she has made but when asked for examples, either ignore the request or supply an example that is not r****t (but an i***t trying to make his point will claim it is) or supply what is claimed an inaccurate statement she has made, but is in actuality correct. Which proves the liberal “groupy” who made the claim is actually the stupid one.

My favorite example is her statement at a tea party rally in 2010 when she said; "Don't be thinking that we've got victory for America in the bag yet...We can't party like it's 1773."

So many liberals erupted with condescension and guffaws’ claiming it proves how stupid she really is wrongly thinking she was referring to the declaration of independence, and she didn’t know it took place in 1776. It just proved how stupid and clueless they were when you think about it, DUH, Tea Party, as in Boston Tea Party, took place in 1773 like she was referring to and the knee jerk i***ts failed to even catch the nuance that she was speaking at a Tea Party Rally. So who’s the stupid one now? Not much was made of the liberal screw up by the drive by media because; of course it made their buddies look stupid as it should have.

The Christian girl on the left will fight for your choice of worship, the Muslim girl on the right will k**l you for it.

I posted this on another blog on this site, thought I'd repost it here since it is relevant. And I was too lazy to right a whole other response.


Islam = Muslim = Sharia = NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH. If you don't agree see what anybody left alive from Charlie Hebdo would say about it? Charlie Hebdo not only satirized Islam and Muhammad, but everybody. They satirically attacked Christians and Jesus Christ even more viciously then they attacked Muhammad and for much longer, but did any Christian gunmen show up at their door? No, the Muslim Sharia enforcers did, and they carried out what Sharia demanded of Muslims, death to the blasphemers of Muhammad and the word of Islam.

If there were a word for supporting Islam and supporting Freedom of Speech, it would definitely be an oxymoron. If I were living under Sharia law, my Avatar would put my life in danger. We must keep Islam in check. To be Muslim is to be against freedom of speech. To support their right to follow their religion you also have to support their attack on our freedom of speech. So why would any freedom loving American want them around? The problem is, these people have money and use our system of government to slowly creep into power. Any Muslim attempt at forcing Sharia down our throats and or suppress criticism of Islam must be met with a quick and severe slap down for our own protection.

CAIR is quick to use claimed prejudice against Muslims has put Muslims in danger, but I can think of no incident that has occurred that supports that? Yet there are numerous fatal incidents that show our small Muslim minority pose a future threat to all our freedoms. In the news there are several be headings at the hand of Muslims against non-Muslims and the number of Honor K*****gs between Muslims continue to grow. They try to use their made-up victim-hood at the hands of "Islamo Phobia" to spearhead their agenda and maybe in the end force Sharia down our throats.

Case in point, Dearborn Michigan, the call to prayer intrudes into every non Muslim’s life several times a day. Even in the privacy of your own home you cant get away from it unless you want to sound proof your home. Should one have to sound proof one’s home to keep unwanted religious references out of your life? This is all with government approval since Muslims have more or less taken over Dearborn. During the Muslim festival in Dearborn, Christians were stoned and assaulted for passing out Christian literature and exercising their freedom of speech. But the police did nothing but stand by as this occurred, then rather then take action against the Muslim attackers, turned on the Christians and ordered them to leave or get arrested for inciting a r**t.

There are many other Dearborn’s slowly slithering into existence and they are all a clear and present danger to our freedoms. We all have a right to fear what is coming since government is not keeping the spill over from claimed Muslim worship into our daily lives in check. Finally this letter I found on a website explains this all clearly and you can see it happening here.


What Islam Isn’t


By Dr. Peter Hammond
FrontPageMagazine. com | Monday, April 21, 2008


The following is adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: S***ery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food pr********n jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States ).

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger r**ting, jihad m*****a formations, sporadic k*****gs and church and synagogue burning:


Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing m*****a warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start k*****g each other for a variety of reasons.

‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. – Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would

"Those who sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither" Benjamin Franklin.

Hence I agree with you but only on the first sentence of your post. The constitution protects everyone’s speech, especially speech we don't agree with. But from then on YOU ARE WRONG.

Islam = Muslim = Sharia = NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH. If you don't agree see what anybody left alive from Charlie Hebdo would say about it? Charlie Hebdo attacked everybody. They satirically attacked Christians and Jesus Christ even more viciously then they attacked Muhammad and for much longer, but did any Christian gunmen show up at their door? No, the Muslim Sharia enforcers did, and they carried out what Sharia demanded of Muslims, death to the blasphemers of Islam.

If there were a word for supporting Islam and supporting Freedom of Speech, it would definitely be an oxymoron. If I were living under Sharia law, my Avatar would put my life in danger. You claim Muslims in America are too few to matter and call us cowards who want to keep them in check. Well they must be kept in check. To be Muslim is to be against freedom of speech. To support their right to religion you also have to support their attack on our freedom of speech. So why would any freedom loving American want them around? The only reason would be because the constitution allows it. The problem is, these people have money an use our system of government to slowly creep into power. Any divergence from religious worship into suppression of others rights need to be met with a quick and sever slap down for our own protection.

CAIR is quick to claim prejudice against Muslims is putting Muslims in danger, but name one incident that has occurred that supports that? Yet there are numerous fatal incidents that show your “six tenths of a percent of our population” are not so non-toxic as you claim. In the news there are several be headings at the hand of Muslims against non-Muslims and the number of Honor K*****gs between Muslims continue to grow.

You claim they are too little to matter? I bet you wont find a non-Muslim in Dearborn Michigan that would agree with you. The call to prayer intrudes into every non Muslim’s life several times a day. Even in the privacy of your own home you cant get away from it unless you want to sound proof your home. Is that right, should one have to sound proof one’s home to keep unwanted religious references out of your life? This is all with government approval since Muslims have more or less taken over Dearborn. During the Muslim festival in Dearborn, Christians were stoned and assaulted for passing our Christian literature and exercising their freedom of speech. But the police did nothing but stand by as this occurred, then rather then take action against the lawbreakers, turned on the Christians and ordered them to leave or get arrested for inciting a r**t.

There are many other Dearborn’s slowly slithering into existence and they are all a clear and present danger to our freedoms. We all have a right to fear what is coming since government is not keeping the spill over from worship into our daily lives in check. Finally this letter I found on a website explains this all clearly and you can see it happening here.


What Islam Isn’t


By Dr. Peter Hammond
FrontPageMagazine. com | Monday, April 21, 2008


The following is adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: S***ery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food pr********n jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States ).

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger r**ting, jihad m*****a formations, sporadic k*****gs and church and synagogue burning:


Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing m*****a warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start k*****g each other for a variety of reasons.

‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. – Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would

I bet the inhuman slime was murmuring Allahu Akbar when he was standing on the infant. Did you notice, that all through history, when Christians asked god for help, they were basically the underdogs and asking the higher power for assistance to overcome.

On the other hand Islamist are constantly invoking the praise of Allah when beheading a helpless restrained person, when k*****g children, when committing atrocities against defenseless human beings. Islam, the religion of the weak, the perverted, the masochistic, the inhumane cowards. There are many dead religions in history, Islam should join them.

What are the gun laws in France? If it were my paper, what with the fire bombing and the paper continuing to yank the Islamic chain, I would have everyone in the office trained and carrying. It will happen again and it will happen here. I think I will back ji-hawg the ammo I already have. I figure bacon grease in some paint thinner mix it in paint, then a little dab on the tip of the bullet so the trajectory isn't affected too much. May work.

I fail to see the ignominy in this case. I read the article, these people were t***sporting the remains of their still born child to burial. They had the necessary permits and it was no different then a hearse t***sporting a body in a funeral procession. I have no love loss for Muslims, but please, if you are going to put up an example of Americans caving to Muslim laws, use a real example. This was not an example of sharia law being crammed down our throat but a bumbling cop who needed more training.

The story goes:Police in Millersville have called off the search for a car that had a baby in the trunk after they said those inside had the proper permits to t***sport a deceased child. The men were stopped by an officer Wednesday and then later let go, prompting a statewide search.

During a press conference Thursday, Millersville Police Chief Chief David Hindman said a woman of Saudi Arabian descent had a miscarriage at a hospital in Bowling Green on December 7. They were given a provisional death certificate for the 15-week-old still born.

On Wednesday afternoon, the father was driving with two relatives in the car to t***sport the child to a burial ground in Franklin when they were stopped by a Millersville Police officer for having an unreadable tag.

The father told the officer they were traveling from Bowling Green, Kentucky, to Franklin, Tennessee, to bury a child in accordance with their Islamic faith.

He told the officer the child was inside the trunk.

They said the body had been placed there by an Imam, a leader within the Islamic Community, and it would be against their beliefs to disturb the body.

Not wanting to disrupt a religious ceremony, the officer allowed them to leave.

Chief Hindman said the driver tried to show the officer the death certificate, but a language barried confused him.

Once Chief Hindman was notified, a search got underway.

Chief Hindman said it was a mistake, but added his officer ultimately did the right thing. However, he said he still felt he should have been notified about a dead body in a car.

"But this was a one-in-a-million case, and I stand by my officer's decision," he said.

Hindman said he spoke with officials in Warren County Thursday morning. After determining the information checked out, he called off the search and decided to let the mourning family grieve.

The chief said his officer will receive additional training.